J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 9009-9017
9009
Dr a w ba ck s Ar isin g fr om th e High Ster ic Con gestion in th e
Syn th esis of New Den d r itic P olya lk yla r om a tic P olyr a d ica ls
†
†
‡
†,
Daniel Ruiz-Molina, J aume Veciana, Fernando Palacio, and Concepci o´ Rovira *
Institut de Ci e` ncia de Materials de Barcelona (CSIC), Campus U.A.B, 08193 Bellaterra (Spain) and
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Arag o´ n (CSIC-UZ) Universidad de Zaragoza,
E-50009 Zaragoza (Spain)
Received December 3, 1996 (Revised Manuscript Received September 4, 1997X)
The synthesis of the highly strained tris(R,R-bis(pentachlorophenyl)-2,4,5,6-tetrachlorotolyl)methane
(8), which is the precursor of the first generation of the polyradical series III, has been achieved by
exhaustive chlorination of compound 11. Stepwise divergent synthesis, by successive Friedel-
Crafts reactions, of the precursors of dendritic series II and III was not possible since the limit
generation was reached in the earlier synthetic steps due to high steric congestion. Several
polyradical mixtures derived from 8 have also been prepared, being stable under ambient conditions.
The formation, electrochemistry, and magnetic properties of these polyradical species are discussed.
The steric hindrance of highly chlorinated hydrocarbon 8 prevents the formation of tetraradical
1
5.
In tr od u ction
initiator core (Chart 1). All are based on highly chlori-
nated 1,3-connected polyarylmethyl radical centers for
which theory predicts ferromagnetic couplings between
the neighboring spins and, therefore, high-spin ground
states for the resulting dendrimers. Moreover, due to
their hyperbranched topologies, they must have large
energy gaps between the ground states and the first
excited ones. High thermal and chemical stability are
indeed expected for all the members of these series due
to the great steric hindrance produced by the chlorine
atoms in the ortho positions that proved to be very
The development of magnetic materials with meso-
scopic size is an area of increasing interest due to the
new and exotic properties expected for such compounds,
taking into account that nanometer size structures can
manifest quantum-mechanics effects at the macroscopic
scale.1 The potential use of such compounds requires
specific chemical and structural characteristics such as
a high stability, uniformity, and a well defined size.
These compounds, however, conflict with the realization
that “engineering down” approaches are unpractical.
Hence, with the possibility of “engineering up” from an
initiator core, large and complex molecules have become
an increasingly attractive prospect.
effective in the stabilization of a wide number of similar
mono- and biradicals.5 The series of dendrimer polymers
I differs from series II and III in the nature, size, and/or
multiplicity (or branching) of their central core unit, N
and the three series differ in their branching-juncture
multiplicities, N . Thus, the series I has a hyperbranched
topology with N ) 3 and N ) 4, and the series II has
) 6 and N ) 4 while the series III has a lower level
of branching with N ) 3 and N ) 2 and the topology of
a three-coordinated Caley tree.
c
,
2
Dendrimers, also called cascade molecules or cauli-
flower compounds, are step growth macromolecules with
3
b
symmetrical three-dimensional structures with a sharply
defined size. These compounds show unusually interest-
ing properties such as fractality, monodispersivity, me-
soscopic dimensions, and endoreceptor properties, being
suggested as units for the construction of three-dimen-
c
b
N
c
b
c
b
Up to now, we have obtained the first polyradical
generation of the series I which, as predicted, is a robust
quartet that displays a high stability and show typical
starbust dendrimeric characteristics such as a fractal
character and a spheroidal shape.6 Nevertheless, the
second generation of this dendritic series revealed a drop
2
sional devices on a molecular level (nanotechnology). On
the other hand, purely organic magnetic materials are
current topics of great interest, one of the general
successful approaches being those based on π-conjugated
polyradicals with topologically polarized π spins.4 Thus,
combination of the last type of polyradicals with a
dendritic nature seems a proper way to achieve mesos-
copic organic magnetic materials.
,7
(4) (a) Mataga, N. Theor. Chim. Acta 1968, 10, 1972. (b) Ovchinikov,
A. A. Theor. Chem. Acta 1978, 47, 297. (c) Veciana, J .; Rovira, C.;
Crespo, M. I.; Armet, O.; Domingo, V. M.; Palacio, F. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 2552. (d) Rajca, A.; Utamapanya, S.; Xu, J . J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9235. (e) Rajca, A.; Utamapanya, S.;
Thayumanavan, S. Ibid. 1992, 114, 1884. (f) Rajca, A.; Utamapanya,
S. Ibid. 1991, 115, 2396. (g) Rajca, A.; Rajca, S. Ibid. 1995, 117, 806.
Following this approach, we started the study of three
different series of polyradical dendrimers, differing in the
(
h) Fujita, I.; Teki, Y.; Takui T.; Kinoshita, T.; Itoh, K.; Miko, F.;
†
Insitut de Ciencia dels Materials de Barcelona.
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Arag o´ n.
Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, November 15, 1997.
1) (a) Sessoli, R.; Tsai, H. L.; Schake, A.; Wang, S.; Vincent, J . B.;
Sawaki, Y.; Iwamura, H.; Izuoka, A.; Sugawara, T. Ibid. 1990, 112,
4074. (I) Nakamura, N.; Inoue, K.; Iwamura, H.; Fujioka, T.; Sawaki,
Y. Ibid. 1992, 114, 1484. (j) Matsuda, K.; Nakamura, N.; Takahasi,
K.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. Ibid. 1995, 117, 5550. (k)
Nakamura, N.; Inoue, K.; Iwamura, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1993, 32, 872. (l) Matsuda, K.; Nakamura, N.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.;
Iwamura, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1996, 69, 1483.
(5) (a) Ballester, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 380. (b) Armet, O.;
Veciana, J .; Rovira, C.; Riera, J .; Casta n˜ er, J .; Molins, E.; Rius, J .;
Miravitlles, C.; Olivella, S.; Brichfeus, J . J . Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 5608.
(c) Veciana, J .; Rovira, C.; Armet, O.; Riera, J .; Casta n˜ er, J .; Vincent,
E.; Radhakrishna, P.; Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1988, 156, 301. (d)
Veciana, J .; Rovira, C.; Crespo, M. I.; Armet, O.; Domingo, V. M.;
Palacio, F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2552. (e) Ballester, M.;
Pascual, I.; Carreras, C.; Vidal-Gancedo, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 4205.
‡
X
(
Folting, K.; Gatteschi, D.; Christou, G.; Hendrickson, D. N. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1804. (b) Chien, C. L. Recent Advances in
Magnetism and Magnetic Materials; Huang, H. L., Kuo, P. C., Eds.;
World Scientific: Singapore, 1989. (c) Kahn, O. Molecular Magnetism;
VCH: New York, 1993. (d) Awschalom, D. D.; DiVicenzo, D. P.; Smyth,
J . F. Science 1992, 258, 414.
(
2) (a) Tomalia, D. A.; Naylor, A. M.; Goddard III, W. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 138. (b) Tomalia, D. A. Adv. Mater.
994, 6, 529. (c) V o¨ gtle, F.; Issberner, J .; Moors, R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2413. (d) Frechet, J . M. J . Science 1994, 263, 1715.
3) Young, J . K.; Baker, G. R.; Newkome, G. R.; Morris, K. F.;
J ohnson, C. S., J r. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 3464.
1
(
S0022-3263(96)02238-4 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society