1280
D. Setamdideh – B. Zeynizadeh · Reduction of Carbonyl Compounds with NaBH4/Charcoal
interaction with the substrate shows higher efficiency ples (melting or boiling points). Organic layers were dried
over anhydrous sodium sulfate. All yields refer to isolated
pure products. TLC (silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheet) was
applied for the purity determination of substrates, products
and reaction monitoring.
in the reductions. (ii) The hydrolysis of the alkoxy-
borate intermediate produced in the reaction mixture
in the presence of water could promote the reductions.
Conclusions
Reduction of carbonyl compounds with the NaBH4/charcoal
system in wet THF; typical procedure
In this investigation, we have shown that the combi-
nation system of NaBH4/charcoal in wet THF reduces
a variety of carbonyl compounds to their correspond-
ing alcohols in high to excellent yields. Reduction re-
actions were carried out with 0.5 – 2 molar equivalents
of NaBH4 in the presence of 1 – 2 molar equivalents
of charcoal in THF-H2O (2 : 0.1 ml) (method A). By
lowering the amount of aprotic solvent and increasing
that for charcoal (0.4 g) (method B) and performing the
reactions in a solid-gel media, we observed faster re-
duction rates. The combination system of NaBH4/C in
the case of conjugated aldehydes and ketones showed
a perfect regioselectivity and efficiency. Reduction of
acyloins and α-diketones by the NaBH4/C system also
produced efficiently the corresponding vicinal diols
in wet THF. All reductions were accomplished at r. t.
and therefore, under the aspects of the availability and
cheapness of the reagents, high efficiency and regiose-
lectivity of the reductions, shorter reaction times, easy
work-up procedure, this new protocol for NaBH4 re-
duction of carbonyl compounds could be a useful ad-
dition to the present methodologies.
Method A: In a round-bottomed flask (10 ml) equipped
with a magnetic stirrer, a solution of benzaldehyde (0.106 g,
1 mmol) in THF (2 ml) was prepared. To this solution,
NaBH4 (0.019 g, 0.5 mmol) and then charcoal (0.012 g,
1 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred at r. t.
for 30 sec. Afterwards, H2O (0.1 ml) was added and the
mixture was stirred at r. t. for 2 min. Completion of the re-
action was monitored by TLC (eluent; CCl4/Et2O: 5/2). Wa-
ter (5 ml) was then added to the reaction mixture and it
was stirred for another 5 min. The mixture was extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 × 6 ml) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4.
Evaporation of the solvent and a short column chromatog-
raphy of the resulting crude material over silica gel (elu-
ent; CCl4/Et2O: 5/3) afforded the pure liquid benzyl alcohol
(0.102 g, 94%, Table 2).
Method B: In a round-bottomed flask (10 ml) equipped
with a magnetic stirrer, a solution of benzophenone (0.182 g,
1 mmol) in THF (1 ml) was prepared. To this solution,
H2O (0.5 ml) and charcoal (0.4 g) was added and the pre-
pared solid-gel mixture was stirred at r. t. for 1 min. After-
wards, NaBH4 (0.076 g, 2 mmol) was added and the mix-
ture was stirred for another 15 min. The progress of the re-
action was monitored by TLC (eluent; CCl4/Et2O: 5/2). At
the end of the reaction, the mixture was filtered and washed
with CH2Cl2 (3 × 6 ml). The filtrate was dried over anhy-
drous Na2SO4; evaporation of the solvent and a short column
chromatography of the resulting crude material over silica
gel (eluent; CCl4/Et2O: 5/3) gave white crystalline benzhy-
drol (0.169 g, 92%, Table 3).
Experimental Section
General
All substrates and reagents were purchased from com-
mercially sources with the best quality and used without
further purification. Charcoal was used in activated form
(Merck). IR and 1H NMR spectra were recorded on Thermo
Nicolet Nexus 670 FT-IR and Bruker 300 MHz spectrome-
ters, respectively. The products were characterized by their
1H NMR or IR spectra and comparison with authentic sam-
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully appreciated the financial support of
this work by the research council of Urmia University.
[1] a) S. D. Burke, R. L. Danheiser, Handbook of Reagents
for Organic Synthesis, Oxidizing and Reducing
Agents, Wiley-VCH, New York (1999); b) J. Seyden-
Penne, Reductions by the Alumino- and Borohydrides
in Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, New York
(1997); c) M. Hudlicky, Reductions in Organic Chem-
istry, Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1984).
M. Thirumalaikumar, J. Organomet. Chem. 609, 137
(2000).
[3] S. Nishimura, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalytic
Hydrogenation for Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH,
New York (2001).
[4] a) W. B. Smith, J. Heterocyclic Chem. 24, 745 (1987);
b) M. Petrini, R. Ballini, G. Rosini, Synthesis 713
(1987).
[2] a) H. Firouzabadi, B. Zeynizadeh, Iranian J. Sci.
Tech. Trans. A 19, 103 (1995); b) M. Periasamy,
[5] a) B. Zeynizadeh, T. Behyar, J. Braz. Chem. Soc.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 8/14/15 3:27 PM