RSC Advances
Paper
To summarize, ZSM-5 zeolite organization into nanosheet
layers led to a 32% raise in the TOF for chlorobenzene haloge-
nation, suggesting that all O–H groups from the catalyst are
accessible and probably involved in the catalytic reaction
5 Z. Liu, Y. Wang and Z. Xie, Chin. J. Catal., 2012, 33, 22.
6 T. F. Degnan, Jr, Top. Catal., 2000, 13, 349.
7 W. Vermeiren and J. P. Gilson, Top. Catal., 2008, 52, 1131.
8 D. M. Ruthven and M. F. M. Post, in, Introduction to Zeolite
Science and Practice, ed. H. van Bekkum, E. M. Flanigen, P.
A. Jacobs and J. C. Jansen, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001, p. 525.
9 A. Corma, J. Catal., 2003, 216, 298.
35
whatever their localization and strength. In contrast, the
chlorination of nitrobenzene requires stronger BrØnsted acid
sites able to protonate TCCA molecule and thus to activate the
36
chlorine atom. One could therefore estimate the fraction of 10 F. C. Buciuman and B. Kraushaar-Czarnetzki, Catal. Today,
mild acidic external silanol groups in ZSM-5 nanosheets to 2001, 69, 337.
roughly 1/3 of the total amount of BrØnsted acid sites. Fig. 6 11 S. Mintova, N. H. Olson, V. Valtchev and T. Bein, Science,
summarizes the possible reaction of the aromatic substrate 1999, 283, 958.
either within the zeolite porous network (for nitrobenzene and 12 A. Zabala Ruiz, H. Li and G. Calzaferri, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
chlorobenzene) or at the external silanol groups from zeolite
nanosheets (chlorobenzene only).
2006, 45, 5282.
13 F. Sch u¨ th and W. Schmidt, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 629.
Mota et al. have developed a method to assess the acid 14 L. Tosheva and V. P. Valtchev, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 2494.
strength of different solid acids with the use of linear free 15 D. M. Poojary, J. O. Perez and A. Cleareld, J. Phys. Chem.,
energy relationship for the H–D exchange with mono-
1992, 96, 7709.
substituted aromatics. A combination of H/D exchange tech- 16 K. G. Strohmaier and D. E. W. Vaughan, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
nique (to determine the whole number of O–H groups present 2003, 125, 16035.
in the zeolite) with the present strategy to perform the halo- 17 A. Corma, M. J. Diaz-Cabanas, J. L. Jorda, C. Martinez and
genation reaction of various deactivated aromatics can there- M. Moliner, Nature, 2006, 443, 842.
fore be used as a tool to estimate the fraction of acid sites 18 K. Egeblad, C. H. Christensen, M. Kustova and
involved in those electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions. C. H. Christensen, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 946.
Hence, one may distinguish the quantity of sites possessing 19 R. Chal, C. Gerardin, M. Bulut and S. van Donk,
47
41
milder acidity by tailoring the basicity of the probe molecule
used for the reaction.
ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 67.
20 R. Garcia, I. Diaz, C. Marquez-Alvarez and J. Perez-Pariente,
Chem. Mater., 2006, 18, 2283.
2
1 B. Louis, G. Laugel, P. Pale and M. M. Pereira,
ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1263.
4
. Conclusion
The gas-solid phase chlorination of deactivated arenes (chlo- 22 B. Louis, F. Ocampo, H. S. Yun, J. P. Tessonnier and
robenzene and nitrobenzene) using TCCA, was successfully M. M. Pereira, Chem. Eng. J., 2010, 161, 397.
performed over two nano-sized ZSM-5 zeolites. Whilst no 23 J. Perez-Ramirez, C. H. Christensen, K. Egeblad,
change in the selectivity toward the reaction products could be
C. H. Christensen and J. C. Groen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008,
37, 2530.
24 M. Choi, K. Na, J. Kim, Y. Sakamoto, O. Terasaki and R. Ryoo,
Nature, 2009, 461, 246.
evidenced, signicant variations in TOF values were observed,
ꢂ3
ꢂ3
i.e.; 1.9 ꢃ 10 and 2.8 ꢃ 10 molconv. chlorobenzene per molH
+
ꢂ2 ꢂ1 ꢂ1
m
g
h
over ZSM-5 nanocrystals and nanosheets, respec-
tively. The reverse performance was observed for nitrobenzene, 25 K. Na, M. Choi, W. Park, Y. Sakamoto, O. Terasaki and
where a 38% higher TOF was achieved over ZSM-5 nanocrystals
with respect to ZSM-5 nanosheets.
R. Ryoo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 4169.
26 W. Park, D. Yu, K. Na, K. E. Jelfs, B. Slater, Y. Sakamoto and
R. Ryoo, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 5131.
2
7 J. Dhainaut, T. J. Daou, Y. Bidal, N. Bats, B. Harbuzaru,
G. Lapisardi, H. Chaumeil, A. Defoin, L. Rouleau and
J. Patarin, CrystEngComm, 2013, 15, 3009.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Agence Nationale de la Recher-
che (ANR) for supporting the ANR-10-JCJC-0703 project (Self- 28 J. Kim, W. Kim, Y. Seo, J.-C. Kim and R. Ryoo, J. Catal., 2013,
AsZeo). PL would like to thank the National Research Fund 301, 187.
Luxembourg for his PhD grant. The technical assistance from 29 J. Kim, W. Park and R. Ryoo, ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 337.
Thierry Romero and Jean-Daniel Sauer was highly appreciated. 30 E. Verheyen, C. Jo, M. Kurttepeli, G. Vanbutsele,
E. Gobechiya, T. I. Kor ´a nyi, S. Bals, G. van Tendeloo,
R. Ryoo, C. E. A. Kirschhock and J. A. Martens, J. Catal.,
References
2013, 300, 70.
1
2
M. E. Davis, Nature, 2002, 417, 813.
C. H. Bartholomew and R. J. Farrauto, Fundamentals of
31 S. Hu, J. Shan, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Gong, Z. Wu and
T. Dou, Appl. Catal., A, 2012, 445–446, 215.
Industrial Catalytic Processes, J. Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 32 K. Na, C. Jo, J. Kim, W.-S. Ahn and R. Ryoo, ACS Catal., 2011,
2nd edn, 2006, p. 60.
1, 901.
3
4
A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 559.
33 Y. Seo, K. Cho, Y. Jung and R. Ryoo, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 713.
ˇ
J. Cejka, G. Centi, J. Perez-Pariente and W. J. Roth, Catal. 34 T. J. Daou, M. Boltz, L. Tzanis, L. Michelin and B. Louis,
Today, 2012, 179, 2.
Catal. Commun., 2013, 39, 10.
27248 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 27242–27249
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014