1
16
R. Mistri et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 376 (2013) 111–119
Table 4
superstructure formation, since neither extra spots appear in the FT
images nor strips or clustered spots. Thus, it appears that M–O–Ce
superstructure formation is restricted to Pd only. In Fig. 7(g) several
Ru particles of 2–4 nm in size are shown. Spots at 2.34 A are due to
Ru (1 0 0) planes.
Hydrogenation activities of PdRuC2 towards other chloronitrobenzenes and
nitrobenzene.
2
a
−1
)
Reagent
p-CNB
o-CNB
Reaction time (min) Conversion (%) TOF × 10 (s
˚
75
100
4.83
A general view of as-prepared PdRuC2 is depicted in Fig. 7(h).
A lattice fringe view is shown in Fig. 7(i), where several particles
of 2–4 nm are identified. Given their dimension, these particles are
likely ruthenium. Fig. 7(j) corresponds to another part of the sample
in which small particles of about 1 nm are well distributed over the
support. Given their similarity to the particles present in sample
PdC2, these particles in sample PdRuC2 are likely palladium. Inter-
estingly, the FT image of the ceria support exhibit several spots
clustered around the nominal pure CeO2 values, thus suggesting
the existence again of a Pd–O–Ce structure. A comprehensive image
is provided in Fig. 7(k). In this image, individual Ru and Pd parti-
cles as well as Pd–O–Ce superstructure are identified. The FT image
corresponds to the Pd–O–Ce support, whereas an individual Ru par-
ticle showing (0 0 2) fringes at 2.14 A is indicated along with an
individual Pd cluster, too small for exhibiting lattice fringes.
Thus, in PdC2, Pd is encountered both in individual Pd entities
of about 1 nm in diameter and in a surface Pd–O–Ce superstruc-
ture. In RuC2, Ru is encountered only in individual Ru crystallites
of about 2–4 nm in diameter. In PdRuC2, the Pd–O–Ce superstruc-
ture is maintained along with individual Pd and Ru particles of
ca. 1 and 2–4 nm, respectively. Note that ordering of the super-
structure originates extra spots in HRTEM because the symmetry
order decreases, but the absence of such extra spots does not elim-
75
20
98
100
4.73
–
1
1
m-CNB
NB
75
20
96
100
4.64
–
75
20
80
86.4
93.2
100
5.34
–
–
1
1
◦
Reaction condition: 1 g p-CNB, 0.5 g catalyst, 100 mL EtOH and 35 C.
a
Calculated considering Pd-only contribution.
over this catalyst and the results are summarized in Table 4. As
expected the o- and m-derivatives show similar activity (o- and
m-CNB gives ∼98% and ∼96% of the corresponding aniline after
˚
7
5 min of reaction) with more than 99% selectivity and for the
parent compound NB, a relatively lower activity is observed. Never-
theless, the NB to aniline (AN) conversion was 86% after 75 min that
increased to 93% after 120 min and hydrogenation was complete
beyond 180 min of reaction with 100% selectivity. Thus, PdRuC2
has the potential to be used as a general hydrogenation catalyst for
these types of organic molecules.
Table 2 also lists the TOF values for various catalysts calculated
considering the total moles of metal component taken in the prepa-
ration. As because Ru has been found to be inactive towards the
reaction and it is the Pd component that contributes to the activity,
we have calculated the TOF values of the bimetal ionic catalysts in
reference to Pd-only and those are also incorporated in table. The
TOF over PdRuC2 is almost four times that over PdC2 considering
total metal (Pd and Ru both) and it is more than eight times if we
consider Pd-only value. Although the TOF reported by Liu et al. for
this hydrogenation on PVP-Ru/Pd colloids is higher than our cal-
culated TOFs, the selectivity obtained by them is much less [22].
The TOF’s are similar for all the three chloronitrobenzenes, namely
inate metal ion incorporation in the CeO lattice. If incorporation is
2
random there will be no extra spots. So, random Ru–O–Ce phase
is likely there for Ru, whereas supercell structure is present in
Pd–O–Ce. No evidence for alloy formation between Pd and Ru is
encountered, although the possibility of surface alloy cannot be
completely ruled out by HRTEM measurements over these rather
small metallic particles.
The heated sample PdRuC2HT500 is similar to the sample
PdRuC2 (see Fig. 8(a)–(c)). The only difference is that Ru parti-
cles maintain their size after heating (2–4 nm), but Pd particles
experience a size growth, from about 1 nm in sample PdRuC2 up
to 2–3 nm in sample PdRuC2HT500. This is clear from particle
size distribution measurements over Fig. 8(a)–(c) corresponding to
sample PdRuC2HT500. Upon sintering, Pd particles develop crystal-
lographic facets, as shown in Fig. 8(c) for an individual Pd crystallite
oriented along the [1 1 0] crystallographic direction. In Fig. 8(b),
the FT image corresponding to the support particle indicates that
the existence of the Pd–O–Ce superstructure is maintained after
heating.
The sample aged in the reaction atmosphere for 6 h,
PdRuC2aged, is indistinguishable from the fresh sample PdRuC2
(Fig. 8(d)–(f)). In Fig. 8(d) several Ru particles of 2–4 nm in diam-
eter are well dispersed over the support particles. Pd entities are
also present in a highly dispersed form of about 1 nm, as shown
in Fig. 8(e). A FT image is enclosed corresponding to the support
particle, where spots at 2.9–3.2 A˚ are likely to originate from the
existence of the Pd–O–Ce phase. In Fig. 8(f) several Ru particles are
depicted and identified on the basis of their lattice fringes.
−2
−2
−2 −1
s , respectively for the p-
4
.83 × 10 , 4.73 × 10 and 4.64 × 10
,
o- and m-CNB after 75 min of hydrogenation (see Table 4). For the
−2
−1
s was obtained.
hydrogenation of NB, a TOF of 5.34 × 10
3.4. Microstructural studies
A low magnification view of PdC2 (see Fig. 7(a)) shows it to be
comprised by small (5–8 nm) and large (∼50 nm) ceria crystallites.
Numerous, randomly oriented ceria crystallites are visible and their
electron diffraction pattern (inset in Fig. 7(b)) shows the expected
CeO rings with spacing at 3.12, 2.71, 1.91, 1.63 and 1.56 A˚ ascribed
2
to (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0), (3 1 1) and (2 2 2) crystallographic planes,
respectively. A lattice-fringe image of PdC2 sample (Fig. 7(c)) shows
tiny palladium particles with a mean particle size of about 1 nm.
In addition, the support shows evidence of structural distortion.
FT image of the support (Fig. 7(d)) shows multiple spots clustered
around the crystallographic nominal values, which points to the
formation of Pd–O–Ce phase [29]. Moreover, additional spots at
5
.7 A˚ are indicative of Pd–O–Ce superstructure formation (as dis-
cussed in [29]). In Fig. 7(d), lattice fringes of Pd (1 1 1) at 2.2 A˚ are
3.5. XPS studies
recognized in various particles, which likely have an epitaxial rela-
tionship with the support particle.
Sample RuC2 also contains both large and small CeO2 crystal-
lites, as shown in Fig. 7(e). Ruthenium particles in the range of
XPS of Pd(3d) and Ru(3p) regions of fresh PdRuC2 are shown in
Fig. 9. The Pd(3d5/2,3/2) peaks at 338 and 343.2 eV can be attributed
to Pd in 2+ oxidation state [33]. Similarly, Ru(3p3/2,1/2) peaks at
363.3 and 486.4 eV are due to Ru4+ ions in ceria [34]. In each spectra,
the lower energy shoulder (negligibly smaller for Pd) indicates sig-
nature of metallic components in line with the HRTEM findings. The
Ce(3d) spectra (not included) with characteristic satellite features
2
3
–4 nm are well dispersed over the support (Fig. 7(f)). Spots at
.12 A˚ due to CeO2 (1 1 1) planes are aligned with spots at 2.14 A˚
of Ru (0 0 2) crystallographic planes, suggesting epitaxial growth.
It merits to be highlighted that in this sample there is no Ru–O–Ce