Inorganic Chemistry Communications
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/inoche
Hydrolytically stable Schiff base as highly sensitive aluminium sensor
Soham Samanta, Bhaskar Nath, Jubaraj B. Baruah ⁎
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, 781 039, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
A highly fluorescence sensitive sensor for selective detection of aluminium (III) and also to differentiate iso-
Received 11 April 2012
Accepted 15 May 2012
Available online 24 May 2012
meric acids or two isomers of receptors are presented.
©
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Schiff base
Aluminium sensor, Fluorescence‐on
Hydrolysis
Aluminium is an indispensible element due to its abundance and
use in every sphere of life from utensils to medicine [1–3]. Detection
of aluminium in mixed metal environment is of general concern [4].
On the basis of their differences of response in fluorescence emission,
Schiff bases and related heterocyclic compounds are generally used
for detection of aluminium ions [5–9]. Schiff bases have tendency to
undergo hydrolysis, so, hydrolytic stability of such receptor is impor-
tant. Metal complexes having Schiff base ligands are often used in
various organic transformations, thus fluorophore containing Schiff
bases are of interest to monitor in situ catalytic reactions [10]. The
use of Schiff bases in homogeneous or heterogeneous conditions
may have long standing impact to design receptors for detection of al-
uminium ions. In the present study three imine containing ligands il-
lustrated in Fig. 1, each of them having a chelating site which is one of
the prerequisite structural features to have favourable interactions
with metal ions is chosen to study their selectivity in sensing different
ions. All these ligands 1–3 have two common features, namely a che-
lating site to metal ion and other is each of them possesses a naphtha-
lene ring as fluorophore.
and compared their spectroscopic properties with standard authentic
samples. The compound 1 has absorption maximum at 487 nm; upon
degradation the solution turns pink; new set of visible peak appears at
563 nm (Fig. 2). Generally, hydrolysis of imines is facilitated by acids,
but it is found that compound 1 is relatively more stable in protonated
state with respect to its neutral state, the later state undergoes facile hy-
drolysis. The compound 1–3 shows visible absorptions at 487, 389 and
445 nm respectively, hence the excitation in each case were done near
the absorption maximum and fluorescence emissions were studied
under different conditions. Hydrofluoric acid (5 μl) quenches fluores-
−
6
cence emission of 1 (5×10
M solution in methanol); other acids
such as HCl, HNO etc. also quench the fluorescence emission of 1 in
3
the similar concentration. However, the compounds 2 and 3 follow a re-
verse trend with respect to the compound 1 in emission upon addition
of these acids, and in the cases of 2 and 3 enhancement of emission in-
tensity with a shift in emission maximum occurred. The compounds 1
and 3 are positional isomers, by comparing the trends in fluorescence
emission of these two isomers 1 and 3 upon treatment with a mineral
acid the two isomers can be differentiated. The compound 1 is highly
solvatochromic and it shows a large shift in positions of absorption
maxima in different solvents (refer supplementary materials). Due to
hydrolytic instability, compound 1 is not useful for detection of metal
ions. Attempt to study detection of metal ions by this compound in
The imine group containing compound 1 is hydrolytically un-
stable; but it is stable in common organic solvents. Upon addition
of a drop of water to a DMSO or methanol solution of 1, it trans-
forms to corresponding 1,4-phenylenediamine and the 2-hydroxy-
2
+
2+
2+
2+
naphthaldehyde. The hydrolysis of 1 is studied in an NMR tube by re-
methanol, showed that the metal ions such as Co , Ni , Cu , Zn
1
3+
cording HNMR spectra of compound 1 by dissolving it in DMSO-d
6
and Al cause reduction of fluorescence emission, such reductions in
fluorescence intensity are so less that they are comparable with the di-
lution effect.
1
and followed by recording the HNMR of the same solution by adding
a drop of deuterium oxide. In situ generated degraded products by ad-
dition of D
O can be easily identified by interpreting the 1HNMR
On the other hand, compounds 2 and 3 have the ability to recog-
2
nize Al3 very selectively. They show strong green fluorescence emis-
+
(
supporting information). Further the degraded products are purified
3+
sion in the presence of traces of Al ions. The fluorescence emission
enhancement of 2 by Al3 occurs at 445 nm (λex =380 nm) whereas
it occurs at 489 nm (λex =440 nm) for compound 3. The emission
changes of a methanol solution of 2 on addition of Al3 are shown
+
⁎
+