KINETICS OF PHENOL OXIDATION
yield of oxygen uptake (decrease in COD at COD
89
CONCLUSION
0
1
2
000 mg O l ) obtained in this work, i.e., approxi-
1
The yield of phenol oxidation under flash corona
electric discharge at the maximal electric field in-
tensity in the discharge space and small density of
generated active species is of the same order of mag-
nitude as in the case of catalytic ozonation and ex-
ceeds that achieved by conventional ozonation.
mately 2 (100 eV) , corresponds to the uptake of
11.9 g of oxygen per 1 kW h. The COD for phenol is
.38 g O g 1 phenol. Therefore, when recalculated for
2
phenol, the yield of oxidation of organic substances
1
1
1
will be equal to 5 g kW h , or 0.14 (100 eV) . In
many works, the CODs of phenol solutions during
treatment are not given; presented is the content of
phenol proper and of selected compounds, namely, its
oxidation products. As phenol proper is oxidized in
the reaction under study at an approximately 10-fold
higher rate than its degradation products, the yield of
oxidation of phenol proper at COD 2000 mg O l
will be equal to 50 g kW h , or 1.5 (100 eV) . At
lower phenol concentrations, COD 200 mg O l , the
initial yield of oxidation determined in an additional
REFERENCES
1
2
3
. Piskarev, I.M., Zh. Fiz. Khim., 1998, vol. 72, no. 11,
pp. 1976 1983.
. Piskarev, I.M., Zh. Fiz. Khim., 2000, vol. 74, no. 3,
pp. 546 551.
1
0
1
1
1
. Piskarev, I.M., Teor. Osn. Khim. Tekhnol., 2000,
1
0
vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 333 336.
4. Piskarev, I.M., Kinet. Katal., 1999, vol. 40, no. 4,
1
experiment was about 27 g phenol (kW h) , or 0.8
pp. 505 511.
1
(100 eV) . It should be emphasized that the initial
5
6
. Piskarev, I.M., Khim. Vys. Energ., 2000, vol. 34, no. 6,
pp. 475 476.
yield of oxidation is connected with consumption
of phenol proper.
. Pikaev, A.K. and Kabakchi, S.A., Reaktsionnaya spo-
sobnost’ pervichnykh produktov radioliza vody: Spra-
vochnik (Reactivity of the Primary Products of Water
Radiolysis: Reference Book), Moscow: Energoatomiz-
dat, 1982.
The phenol oxidation products were identified in
[7 11]. For oxidation of phenol to hydroquinone,
benzoquinone, and muconic acid the COD recalcu-
lated for one molecule decreases by 7.5, 17, and 28%,
respectively. Further oxidation of these compounds
is a slower process, and the total oxidation rate de-
creases. The data presented in other works for the
7. Al-Hayek, N., Legube, B., and Dore, M., Environ.
Technol. Lett., 1989, vol. 10, pp. 415 426.
8. Fajerwerg, K., Foussard, J.N., Perrard, A., and Debel-
lefontaine, H., Water Sci. Technol., 1997, vol. 35,
no. 4, pp. 103 110.
1
phenol concentration of 1 mM (COD0 230 mg O l )
are listed in Table 2. It is seen that among the works
cited, the highest yield of phenol oxidation was
achieved by catalytic ozonation [7]: 5 mol of ozone
per mol of phenol. It should be noted, however, that
the use of catalysts (e.g., Fe in that work) poses addi-
tional problems connected with contamination of the
water with the catalyst itself. The yield achieved in
electrode-free reaction is of the same order of magni-
tude as in catalytic ozonation, though the yield of
ozone in the process under study per unit energy
consumed is approximately 3 times lower than in
conventional ozonizers [2].
9. Singer, P.C. and Gurol, M.D., Water Res., 1983,
vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1163 1171.
10. Gurol, M.D. and Singer, P.C., Water Res., 1983,
vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1173 1183.
11. Hoigne, J. and Bader, H., Water Res., 1983, vol. 17,
no. 1, pp. 185 194.
12. Hoeben, W.F.L.M., Van Veldhuizen, E.M., Rut-
gers, W.R., and Kroesen, G.M.W., J. Phys. D.: Appl.
Phys., 1999, vol. 32, pp. L133 L137.
13. Gurol, M.D. and Vatistas, R., Water Res., 1987,
vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 895 900.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 75 No. 1 2002