Table 2 Catalytic activity in the oxidation of phenola
H2O2
Product distribution (mol%)
Conversion efficiency
Solvent (mol%)
(mol%)
CAT
HQ
PBQ
CAT/HQ
CH3CN 13.1
MeOH 15.3
40.2
46.0
62.6
95.3
35.0
4.5
2.4
0.2
1.79
21.18
a Reaction conditions: catalyst = 0.10 g, phenol = 1 g, solvent = 5 g, temp.
= 80 °C, phenol/H2O2 = 3 (molar ratio), reaction time = 15 h, conversion
= mol% of phenol consumed during the reaction, H2O2 efficiency = mol%
of H2O2 consumed in the formation of catechol (CAT), hydroquinone (HQ)
and para-benzoquinone (PBQ).
Fig. 2 N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (inset: pore size distribution
curve from MP method) (left) and 31P MAS NMR of calcined microporous
niobium phosphate (right) (* spinning bands).
15.3 and 46%, respectively, in methanol. However, the catechol
selectivities in aprotic (acetonitrile) and protic solvents (metha-
nol) are quite different: 62.6 and 95.3%, respectively. The
catechol to hydroquinone ratios in acetonitrile and methanol are
1.79 and 21.18%, resepectively. This unusual high catechol
selectivity in protic solvent may be probably due to the
formation of hydrogen bonds between the OH group of phenol
and the solvent (MeOH) in a transition state, thereby inducing
the ortho position of phenol to form catechol (Fig. 3), since the
strong hydrophilic character of niobium phosphate (H2O
adsorption = 42 wt%) has the tendency to coordinate with
protic solvents and expand their coordination.
phosphate (0.122 cm3 g21) and VPI-5 (0.117 cm3 g21)2 for
triisopropylbenzene (diameter = 0.85 nm) was carried out,
suggesting the pore size of niobium phosphate is probably
slightly bigger than that of VPI-5 (Table 1). The H2O adsorption
capacities of niobium phosphate and VPI-5 are 0.42 and 0.35
cm3 g21, respectively, which might also be due to interparticle
adsorption. The higher hydrophilicity of microporous niobium
phosphate is due to the larger metal size. The BET specific
surface area of niobium phosphate is 283 m2 g21, which is
smaller than that of a sample prepared using hexadecylamine
(C16) as surfactant (482 m2 g21).6 The 31P MAS NMR spectrum
of calcined niobium phosphate gives a resonance at 223.1 ppm
with respect to H3PO4 (85% aq.), confirming the tetrahedral
coordination of phosphorus (Fig. 2; right). As the connectivity
increases, an upfield shift is observed from 25.3 to 210.6 ppm
for H2PO4, to 218.1 ppm for HPO4 and finally to 219 to 232.5
ppm for PO4.15,16 Niobium ions (Nb5+) in niobium phosphate
are tetra- or penta-coordinated and not hexa-coordinated.6 The
Fig. 3 Mechanism for the formation of catechol in protic solvent (MeOH)
(R = CH3 or H) over microporous niobium phosphate.
P/Nb molar ratio in the niobium phosphate is 1.13. Nb(
V
)
oxidation state is present in microporous niobium phosphate,
which is most stable under our hydrothermal reaction conditions
(acidic medium). Nb5+ ions are in tetrahedral coordination state;
in such a case, the P/Nb molar ratio is expected to be 1. In
addition, the double positive charge is due to framework Nb5+
and P5+ ions balanced by the extraframework excess of
phosphorus (HPO422) and Cl2 anions. The composition of the
microporous niobium phosphate is [Nb1.0(PO4)1.0](H-
PO4)0.13Cl0.74. Effects of pH of the gel, temperature and alkyl
chain length of the surfactant on mesophase formation are given
in Table 1. A mesophase was obtained for decylamine as
surfactant in the gel pH range 3 to 6.5 and temperature 65 to 120
°C, whereas above 130 °C a lamellar phase was produced.
However, when n-hexylamine was used as surfactant in a
narrow gel pH range 3.6 to 4.2 and temperature 65 to 80 °C, the
resulting materials were mesophases. TG analysis of niobium
phosphate shows that the weight loss between 150 and 450 °C
due to removal of surfactant and condensation of hydroxy
groups is 36.3%, which is 27.7% less than that of a sample
prepared using hexadecylamine (C16) as surfactant (50.2%).
The catalytic activity of niobium phosphate in the hydroxyla-
tion of phenol is presented in Table 2. The phenol conversion
(mol% phenol consumed) and H2O2 efficiency (mol% H2O2
consumed) are 13.1 and 40.2%, respectively, in acetonitrile and
In conclusion, a microporous transition metal (niobium)
phosphate has been synthesized by a supramolecular templating
mechanism for the first time, which exhibits an unusual high
selectivity for catechol formation (95.3%) in protic solvents
(MeOH) in the hydroxylation of phenol.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. M. Thomas, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1988, 27, 1673–1691;
(b) W. F. Holderich and H. van Bekkum, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1991,
58, 631–726.
2 M. E. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 3919–3924.
3 M. E. Davis and R. F. Lobo, Chem. Mater., 1992, 4, 756–768.
4 C. T. Kresge, M. E. Leonowicz, W. J. Roth, J. C. Vartuli and J. S. Beck,
Nature, 1992, 359, 710–714.
5 C. Serre, A. Auroux, A. Gervasini, M. Hervieu and G. Férey, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1594–1597.
6 N. K. Mal and M. Fujiwara, Chem. Commun., 2002, 2702–2703.
7 T. Sun and J. Y. Ying, Nature, 1997, 389, 704–706.
8 T. Sun and J. Y. Ying, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 664–667.
9 G. E. Bastardo, R. Mokaya and W. Jones, Chem. Commun., 2001,
1016–1017.
10 S. A. Bagshaw and A. R. Hayman, Adv. Mater., 2001, 13,
1011–1013.
11 C. Serre, M. Hervieu, C. Magnier, F. Taulelle and G. Férey, Chem.
Mater., 2002, 14, 180–188.
Table 1 Effect of pH, surfactant and temperature on mesophase for-
mationa
12 S. A. Bagshaw, E. Prouzet and T. J. Pinnavaia, Science, 1995, 269,
1242–1244.
13 P. Behrens, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 515–518.
14 T. J. Pinnavaia and W. Zhang, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1998, 117,
23–35.
pH
Surfactant
Temperature/°C
Phase
3–6.5
Decylamine
Decylamine
Hexylamine
Hexylamine
65–120
> 130
65–80
> 90
m.p.
l.p.
m.p.
l.p.
15 B. Chakraborty, A. C. Pulikottil, S. Das and B. Viswanathan, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 911–912.
16 D. J. Jones, G. Aptel, M. Brandhorst, M. Jacquin, J. J. Jiménez, A. J.
López, P. M. Torres, I. Piwonski, E. R. Castellón, J. Zajac and J.
Roziére, J. Mater. Chem., 2000, 10, 1957–1963 and references
therein.
3–6.5
3.6–4.2
3–6.5
a m.p. = mesophase, l.p. = lamellar phase.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 872–873
873