268
S. P. Chavan et al.
LETTER
A noteworthy feature of the above transformation is that
even the presence of bulky substituents ortho to the alde-
hyde (entry 2) does not have significant detrimental effect
on the yield as well as the efficiency of the reaction.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr. S. Sivasanker and Dr. T. Sen for providing
the catalyst. SWD, CAG, MSV and CHP thank CSIR, New Delhi,
India for award of fellowships. Funding from CSIR, India under
Young Scientist Award Scheme is gratefully acknowledged.
Another noteworthy feature is the almost quantitative
yields obtained in the oxidation of terepthaldehyde (entry
8) to the corresponding diester. This is a commercially im-
portant transformation in view of the fact that the diester
is used for the manufacture of terylene. The diester is at
present commercially prepared26 by the air oxidation of
dialkyl benzenes at elevated temperatures in gas phase
with Cobalt catalyst followed by esterification of the re-
sulting diacid.
References
(1) Corey, E. J.; Gilman, N. W.; Ganem, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1968, 90, 5616.
(2) Craig, J. C.; Horning, E. C. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 2098.
(3) Mavel, E. N.; Joncich, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73,
973.
(4) Elad, D.; Youssefyeh, R. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1963, 2189.
(5) Abiko, A.; Roberts, J. C.; Takemasa, T.; Masamune, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 4537.
(6) O’Connor, B.; Just, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 3235.
(7) Thomason, S. C.; Kubler, D. G. J. Chem. Educ. 1968, 45,
546.
A plausible mechanism depicting the formation of esters
from aldehydes involving the catalytic cycle with TS-1 is
depicted in Scheme 2.
(8) Rajendran, S.; Trivedi, D. C. Synthesis 1995, 153.
(9) Grigg, R.; Mitchell, T. R. B.; Sutthivaiyakit, S. Tetrahedron
1981, 37, 4313.
(10) Yamada, S.; Morizono, D.; Yamamoto, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1992, 33, 4329.
(11) Dalcanale, E.; Montanari, F. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 567.
(12) McDonald, C.; Holcomb, H.; Kennedy, K.; Kirkpatrick, E.;
Leathers, T.; Vanemon, P. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 1213.
(13) Okimoto, M.; Chiba, T. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 218.
(14) (a) Gopinath, R.; Patel, B. K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 577.
(b) Sato, K.; Hyodo, M.; Takagi, J.; Aoki, M.; Noyori, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1439.
(15) Chem. Abstr. 1982, 96, 37802w.
(16) Thangaraj, A.; Kumar, R.; Mirajkar, S. P.; Ratnasamy, P. J.
Catal. 1991, 130, 1.
(17) Reddy, J. S.; Kumar, R. J. Catal. 1991, 130, 140.
(18) Sheldon, R. A. Top. Curr. Chem. 1993, 164, 21.
(19) Kumar, P.; Kumar, R.; Pandey, B. Synlett 1995, 289.
(20) Murugavel, R.; Roesky, H. W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 477.
(21) Reddy, R. S.; Reddy, J. S.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, P. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 84.
(22) Sonawane, H. R.; Pol, A. V.; Moghe, P. P.; Biswas, S. S.;
Sudalai, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1215.
(23) Joseph, R.; Sudalai, A.; Ravindranathan, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 35, 5493.
Scheme 2
(24) Huybrechts, D. R. C.; De Bruycker, L.; Jacobs, P. A. Nature
1990, 345, 240.
(25) Tatsumi, T.; Nakamura, M.; Nagishi, S.; Taminaga, H. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 476.
(26) Shinohara, H.; Ohashi, H. Japanese Patent 7303833, 1973;
Chem. Abstr., 1973, 79, P42176y.
Aliphatic aldehydes viz. hexanaldehyde and dihydrophe-
nylcinnamaldehyde were also converted to methyl hex-
anoate and methyl dihydrophenylcinnamate respectively
in moderate yields.
Thus a mild and highly efficient methodology has been
developed for the conversion of aromatic aldehydes to the
corresponding esters.27 Use of 30% H2O2 as an oxidant
leads to only water as the by-product. Additionally the
catalytic activity and reusability of TS-1 by virtue of its
heterogeneous nature makes the work-up procedure ex-
tremely simple involving a mere filtration of the catalyst
and removal of the solvent to furnish the esters.
(27) Typical Procedure for the Preparation of Dimethyl
Terephthalate: In a typical reaction, 0.56 mL aq solution of
H2O2 (30%, 5 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred
solution of 0.134 g of terephthaldehyde (1 mmol) and TS-1
(10% by weight) in MeOH and the mixture refluxed until
completion of reaction (8 h). The solvent was removed by
evaporation and the residue washed with water and extracted
with EtOAc. Drying over anhyd Na2SO4 and removal of
solvent furnished 0.19 g essentially of pure diester in 99%
yield.
Thus the present protocol developed by us is operationally
simple and is an important addition to the already existing
methodologies used to effect similar transformations.
IR(nujol): 1710, 1680, 1440, 1370, 1260, 1190, 1100 cm–1
1H NMR (200 MHz): = 3.95 (s, 6 H); 8.10 (s, 4 H)
MS (m/e): 194(24) [M+], 179(5), 164(11), 163(100),
135(27), 120(9), 119(9), 104(17), 103(23), 77(19), 76(34),
75(23).
Synlett 2002, No. 2, 267–268 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York