5572 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 101, No. 28, 1997
Komatsu et al.
On Pt2Ge, the reaction orders in the 1,3-BD hydrogenation
Conclusions
were 0.9 for P(H2) and 0.4 for P(C4H6) and those in the 1-butene
hydrogenation were 0.6 for P(H2) and 0.7 for P(C4H8). These
results suggest that Pt2Ge does not adsorb the particular molecule
strongly among 1,3-BD, 1-butene, and H2 to cover the surface
active sites. Because the activity and selectivity of Pt2Ge for
the reactions tested in this study were not so much different
from those of Pt3Ge, we expected the strong adsorption of H2
on Pt2Ge as was observed on Pt3Ge. The comparable strength
of the adsorption of 1,3-BD and H2 and the negligible effect of
The catalytic properties of Pt-Ge intermetallic compounds
for the hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene are summarized as
follows compared with those of pure Pt.
(1) The activity for the hydrogenation is much lower than
that of pure Pt, and it decreases with decreasing the Pt content,
that is, in the order of Pt3Ge > Pt2Ge > PtGe. Their low
hydrogenation activity results from their low activity for the
dissociation of hydrogen.
(
2) The Pt-Ge intermetallic compounds have the high
1
,3-BD on the H2-D2 equilibration might be explained simul-
selectivity to butenes because of their lower activity for the
butene hydrogenation than that for the 1,3-butadiene hydrogena-
tion, while pure Pt has low selectivity to butenes due to its
extremely high activity for the butene hydrogenation.
taneously by the idea that the adsorption site of H2 is different
from that of 1,3-BD or that HD is formed through the adsorbed
reaction intermediate in the hydrogenation of 1,3-BD in addition
to the simple exchange between the dissociated H and D atoms.
The different reaction orders obtained between Pt3Ge and Pt2Ge
suggest that the surface structure and/or the electronic states of
Pt are different on these IMC. Therefore, the surface transfor-
mation into the Pt3Ge like structure proposed to explain the
induction period in the 1,3-BD hydrogenation on Pt2Ge should
be excluded. The induction period might correspond to the
formation of surface active species from the adsorbed 1,3-BD.
From the above results, the reaction mechanism is discussed
to explain the high catalytic selectivity of Pt3Ge for the
formation of butenes in the hydrogenation of 1,3-BD. On Pt,
(3) In the case of Pt3Ge, the lower activity for the butene
hydrogenation is caused by the much stronger adsorption of H2
and weaker adsorption of butene than that of 1,3-butadiene.
(4) The electron transfer from Ge to Pt5d orbitals as well as
the difference in the geometrical environment of Pt active sites
may result in the drastic change in the activity and selectivity
from those of pure Pt.
The low activity for hydrogenation and hydrogen dissociation
(1) and the high selectivity for partial hydrogenation (2) are
similar catalytic behaviors to those of Co-Ge intermetallic
compounds. This would provide general insights into the unique
catalytic properties of intermetallic compounds prepared by the
combination of transition and typical elements.
1
,3-BD and butenes are adsorbed more strongly than H2. The
normal isotope effect observed on the rate of the 1,3-BD
hydrogenation (Figure 11b) reasonably results from the differ-
ence in the zero-point energy of H2 and D2 because the
dissociation of hydrogen is the rate-determining step. The
poisoning effect of 1,3-BD on the hydrogenation of butenes is
evident from the fact that butane was formed slowly in the
presence of 1,3-BD (Figure 6) and that the hydrogenation of
References and Notes
(1) Wallace, W. E. CHEMTECH 1982, 12, 752.
(2) Takeshita, T.; Wallace, W. E.; Craig, R. S. J. Catal. 1976, 44, 236.
(3) Soga, K.; Imamura, H.; Ikeda, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 1762.
(4) Coon, V. T.; Takeshita, T.; Wallace, W. E.; Craig, R. S. J. Phys.
1
-butene was completed in a minute in the separate run.
Chem. 1976, 80, 1878.
Therefore, the strength of the adsorption is in the order of 1,3-
BD > butenes . H2 on Pt. The strongly adsorbed 1,3-BD
prevents hydrogen molecules from being adsorbed for the
hydrogenation. Butenes adsorbed relatively weakly do not
prevent the dissociative adsorption of hydrogen as strongly as
(5) Elattar, A.; Takeshita, T.; Wallace, W. E.; Craig, R. S. Science
977, 80, 1093.
1
(6) Luengo, C. A.; Cabrera, A. L.; MacKay, H. B.; Mayple, M. B. J.
Catal. 1977, 47, 1.
(7) Tkatchenko, D. B.; Branco, J.; de Matos, A. P. J. Phys. Chem.
995, 99, 5481.
1
(
(
8) Imamura, H.; Wallace, W. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 3145.
9) Chojnacki, T. P.; Schmidt, L. D. J. Catal. 1991, 129, 473.
1
,3-BD, resulting in their higher hydrogenation rate and the
higher selectivity to butane in the hydrogenation of 1,3-BD.
On the surface of Pt3Ge, 1,3-BD and 1-butene are adsorbed
more weakly than H2. The inverse isotope effect observed on
the hydrogenation of 1,3-BD (Figure 12b) and 1-butene can be
explained by their weak adsorption; that is, they can be adsorbed
on Pt3Ge slightly easier when the surface is covered by D instead
of H because of the weaker interaction of D with the surface.
From Figure 7a, the inhibiting effect of 1,3-BD was observed
on the formation of butane, that is, the hydrogenation of butenes.
This demonstrates the stronger adsorption of 1,3-BD than
butenes on Pt3Ge. As a result, the strength of the adsorption is
in the order of H2 . 1,3-BD > butenes. As the rate-determining
step is the adsorption of hydrocarbons, 1,3-BD has the advantage
of being easily hydrogenated compared with 1-butene. During
the hydrogenation of 1,3-BD, butenes formed from 1,3-BD are
easily desorbed into the gas phase and can hardly be adsorbed
again in the presence of hydrogen and 1,3-BD, leading to the
high selectivity to butenes. After 1,3-BD is completely
converted into butenes, the hydrogenation of butenes begins to
occur, though the rate of this hydrogenation is very low because
of the intrinsically low activity of Pt3Ge for the butene
hydrogenation.
(10) Merlen, E.; Beccat, P.; Bertolini, J. C.; Delivhere, P.; Zanier, N.;
Didillon, B. J. Catal. 1996, 159, 178.
11) Coloma, F.; Escribano, A. S.; Fierro, J.-L. G.; Reinoso, F. R. Appl.
Catal. A 1996, 136, 231.
12) Dautzenberg, F. M.; Helle, J. N.; Biloen, P.; Sachtler, M. H. J.
Catal. 1980, 63, 119.
(
(
(
(
13) Bacaud, R.; Bussiere, P.; Figueras, F. J. Catal. 1981, 69, 399.
14) Bahia, A.; Winterbottom, J. M. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1994,
6
0, 305.
(15) Llorca, J.; de la Piscina, P. R.; Fierro, J.-L. G.; Sales, J.; Homs, N.
J. Catal. 1995, 156, 139.
16) Komatsu, T.; Fukui, M.; Yashima, T. 11th International Congress
on Catalysiss40th Anniversary. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1996, 101, 1095.
17) Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second edition; ASM International
and National Institute of Standards and Technology: Materials Park, OH,
990.
18) Garetto, T. F.; Borgna, A.; Apesteguia, C. R. 11th International
(
(
1
(
Congress on Catalysiss40th Anniversary. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1996, 101,
1155.
(
19) Khoobier, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 411. Benson, J. E.; Kohn,
H. W.; Boudart, M. J. Catal. 1966, 5, 307.
20) Bouwman, R.; Biloen, P. J. Catal. 1977, 48, 209.
(
(21) Fuggle, J. C.; Hillebrecht, F. U.; Zeller, R.; Zolnierek, Z.; Bennett,
P. A.; Freiburg, C. Phys. ReV. B 1983, 27, 2145.
(22) Bond, G. C.; Webb, G.; Wells, P. B.; Winterbottom, J. M. J. Chem.
Soc. 1965, 3218.
23) Boitiaux, J. P.; Cosyns, J.; Robert, E. Appl. Catal. 1987, 32, 145.
(24) Bertolini, J. C.; Massardier, J. Catal. Lett. 1991, 9, 183.
(