Dye Laser Photolysis of n-Pentanal
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 102, No. 50, 1998 10279
Because of the overlapping GC/MS peaks of n-butane and other
products, we could not extract an n-butane yield from the 290-
nm photolysis of an n-pentanal/N2 mixture. n-Octane can be
formed from the recombination of C4H9:
(see Table 2)). Thus, the radical formation capability of longer
chain aldehydes such as n-pentanal is significant.
Acknowledgment. We thank Mr. Andrew Levine for his
assistance in the experiments and for calculating the photolysis
rates. We are grateful to Dr. Xianliang Zhou, Ms. Guo Hong,
Dr. Amarjit Narang, and Ms. Michele Losavio for performing
HPLC analysis of photolysis products, and to Dr. Ken Aldous
and Mr. Michael Force for GC/MS analysis of photodissociation
products. Helpful discussions and suggestions by Professor
Robert Keesee, Dr. Xianliang Zhou, Dr. Stephen Riley, and Dr.
Geoffrey Tyndall are acknowledged. This work was supported
by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ATM-
C H + C H f C H
18
(9)
4
9
4
9
8
In the presence of oxygen, n-octane disappeared possibly due
to the formation of butyl peroxy radicals (C4H9O2):
C H + O f C H O
2
(10)
4
9
2
4
9
9
610285.
A summary of the product study using GC/MS and HPLC is
included in Table 2.
References and Notes
A previous study24 on the photolysis of n-butyraldehyde at
(
1) Graedel, T. E.; Farrow, L. A.; Weber, T. A. Atmos. EnViron. 1976,
3
08 nm indicated the yield of ethylene (a coproduct of the
10, 1095.
(
(
2) Grosjean, D. EnViron. Sci. Technol. 1982, 16, 254.
3) Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.; Pitts, J. N., Jr. Atmospheric Chemistry; John
acetaldehyde channel) decreased by 45% when 500-Torr air was
added to 20-Torr n-butyraldehyde. It would be very interesting
to examine the dependence of the acetaldehyde yield as a
function of the oxygen pressure and total pressure from
n-pentanal photolysis.
Atmospheric Photodissociation Rate Constant To Form
the HCO Radical. The photodissociation rate constant (krad)
for n-pentanal to form the HCO radical (or HO2 in the presence
of air) was calculated from the actinic solar flux (J(λ)) reported
by Demerjian et al.,30 the absorption cross section (σ(λ)) of
n-pentanal and the HCO radical yield (Φ(rad, λ)) from n-
pentanal photolysis, both from the present study, using the
relationship
Wiley: New York, 1986.
(4) Moortgat, G. K.; Seiler, W.; Warneck, P. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78,
185.
1
(
(
5) Carmely, Y.; Horowitz, A. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1984, 16, 1585.
6) Moore, C. B.; Weisshaar, J. C. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1983, 34,
5
25.
(7) Ho, P.; Bamford, D. J.; Buss, R. J.; Lee, Y. T.; Moore, C. B. J.
Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 3630.
(
8) Horowitz, A.; Calvert, J. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3105.
(9) Meyrahn, H.; Moortgat, G. K.; Warneck, P. Presented at the 15th
Informal Conference on Photochemistry, Stanford, CA, July 1982.
(
(
10) Shepson, P. B.; Heicklen, J. J. Photochem. 1982, 19, 215.
11) Heicklen, J.; Desai, J.; Bahta, A.; Harper, C.; Simonaitis, R. J.
Photochem. 1986, 34, 117.
(12) Terentis, A. C.; Knepp, P. T.; Kable, S. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1995,
9
9, 12704.
13) Calvert, J. G.; Pitts, J. N., Jr. Photochemistry; John Wiley: New
York, 1966.
(
krad
)
∫
σ(λ)Φ(rad,λ)J(λ) dλ
(11)
(
(
(
14) Lee, E. K. C.; Lewis, R. S. AdV. Photochem. 1980, 12, 1.
15) O’Keefe, A.; Deacon, D. A. G. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1988, 59, 2544.
16) O’Keefe, A.; Scherer, J. J.; Cooksy, A. L.; Sheeks, R.; Heath, J.;
The photolysis rate constants of n-pentanal to form HCO for
noontime on January 1 and July 1 under cloudless conditions
at sea level and a latitude of 40° N were calculated to be 5.0 ×
Saykally, R. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 172, 214.
17) Zhu, L.; Johnston, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 15114.
(
(18) Zhu, L.; Kellis, D.; Ding, C.-F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 257, 487.
(19) Martinez, R. D.; Buitrago, A. A.; Howell, N. W.; Hearn, C. H.;
Joens, J. A. Atmos. EnViron. 1992, 26A, 785.
-
6
-5 -1
1
0
and 1.6 × 10 s , respectively. If both primary HCO
yield from the photolysis of n-pentanal and secondary HCO
yield from the photolysis of the acetaldehyde product were
included by using literature acetaldehyde absorption cross
section and quantum yield data,26 calculated radical formation
rate constants for noontime on January 1 and on July 1 are 6.9
(
34.
20) Herzberg, G.; Ramsay, D. A. Proc. R. Soc. (London) 1955, A233,
(21) Johns, J. W. C.; Priddle, S. H.; Ramsay, D. A. Discuss. Faraday
Soc. 1963, 35, 90.
22) Stoeckel, F.; Schuh, M. D.; Goldstein, N.; Atkinson, G. H. Chem.
(
Phys. 1985, 95, 135.
(23) Reilly, J. P.; Clark, J. H.; Moore, C. B.; Pimentel, G. C. J. Chem.
Phys. 1978, 69, 4381.
-
6
-5
-1
×
10
and 2.5 × 10
s , respectively. Acetaldehyde
photodissociation rate constants that lead to radical formation
(24) Baggott, J. E.; Frey, H. M.; Lightfoot, P. D.; Walsh, R. J. Phys.
-
6
-1
-5 -1
are 2.6 × 10
s
for January 1 and 1.1 × 10
s
for July
Chem. 1987, 91, 3386.
(25) Adach, H.; Basco, N. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1981, 13, 367.
1
. The calculated radical formation rate constants from n-
(
26) Atkinson, R.; Baulch, D. L.; Cox, R. A.; Hampson, R. F., Jr.; Kerr,
J. A.; Troe, J. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1992, 21, 1125.
27) Cantrell, C. A.; Davidson, J. A.; McDaniel, A. H.; Shetter, R. E.;
pentanal photolysis are 1.9-2.7 times and 1.5-2.3 times as fast
as those obtained from acetaldehyde photolysis for January 1
and July 1 conditions, respectively (the lower limit in the range
did not include the HCO radical formed from the photolysis of
the acetaldehyde product; the upper limit assumed acetaldehyde
yields from the photolysis of n-pentanal at atmospheric pressure
were 0.84, 0.91, and 0.68 at 290, 310, and 330 nm, respectively
(
Calvert, J. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 3902.
(28) F o¨ rgeteg, S.; B e´ rces, T.; D o´ b e´ , S. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1979, 11,
19.
2
(
(
29) Blacet, F. E.; Calvert, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 667.
30) Demerjian, K. L.; Schere, K. L.; Peterson, J. T. AdV. EnViron. Sci.
Technol. 1980, 10, 369.