DETECTION OF STEADY STATE MULTIPLICITY
783
energy and the factors of interaction of reactants with
active surface sites.
(iv) It has been found that, during DME conver-
sion, an SSM takes place; it is attributed to the pres-
ence of coke on the surface of a catalyst containing a
ZnO/γ-Al2O3 binary composite and controlled by the
ratio of Lewis and Brønsted sites depending on the
process temperature.
Note that aluminum was used as a binder in the
ZnO + Al2O3 binary system in [5–7]. There are com-
mon approaches in the synthesis that are in accor-
dance with the results for the catalyst samples synthe-
sized in this study. For example, impregnation is prac-
ticed by the diffusion of a mixed solution of active
components containing zinc and aluminum, which
are deposited on alumina, and air-drying at room
temperature for 12 h. This procedure is aimed at
strengthening the bond between zinc and aluminum
oxides. The desired final result of strengthening the
bond between the metals would be the formation of
the ZnAl2O4 spinel. Typically, spinels are formed at
fairly high temperatures above 1000°C. However,
Elam et al. [6] reported the presence of a spinel despite
that the highest calcining point did not exceed 500°C.
At the same time, regardless of the presence of a spinel
in the system, according to [5–7, 22], zinc dissolves in
a zinc–aluminum mixture and strengthens the bond
between the metal oxides.
FUNDING
This work was performed under a state task of the Top-
chiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis of the Russian
Academy of Sciences.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A.L. Maksimov is the editor-in-chief of the Neftekh-
imiya (Petroleum Chemistry) journal. The other authors
declare that there is no conflict of interest to be disclosed
this paper.
REFERENCES
1. A. A. Lamberov, I. N. Mukhambetov, and R. F. Zaly-
Thus, the current fundamental ideas on heteroge-
neous catalysis can be expanded and developed not
only owing to solving the practical problem of catalyst
synthesis, but also owing to a deeper understanding of
the mechanism including the kinetics and dynamics of
the process [21].
aliev, Catal. Ind. 6, 128 (2014).
2. R. Hughes, Deactivation of Catalysts (Academic, Lon-
don, 1984).
3. N. V. Ostrovskii, Catalyst Deactivation Kinetics: Mathe-
matical Models and Their Application (Nauka, Moscow,
2001) [in Russian].
4. V. F. Tret’yakov and R. M. Talyshinskii, Kinetics and
Dynamics of Heterogeneous Catalyzed Petrochemical
Processes (MITKhT, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].
Note that the chemistry of catalytic DME conver-
sion in terms of the effect on the SSM mechanism was
not studied in [8–10]; therefore, the revealed relation-
ships required a more detailed study.
5. D. Liu, Y. Men, J. Wang, et al., Am. J. Anal. Chem. 7
(7), 568 (2016).
The results of this study suggest that the dynamics
of processes catalyzed by composites based on alumi-
num and zinc oxides used in various reactions involv-
ing oxygenates should be studied in detail [7, 22–24].
Typical objects for studying these effects are multir-
oute reactions that occur in accordance with nonlinear
mechanisms complicated by a significant yield of
byproducts and coking of the catalyst surface [25–33];
this fact should be taken into account to implement
industrial petrochemical processes.
6. J. W. Elam, A. D. Routkevitch, and S. M. George, J.
Electrochem. Soc. 150, 339 (2003).
7. M. A. Kipnis, I. A. Belostotskii, E. A. Volnina, and
G. I. Lin, Catal. Ind. 11, 53 (2019).
8. S. N. Khadzhiev, A. L. Maksimov, V. F. Tret’yakov,
et al., Pet. Chem. 58, 405 (2018).
9. A. L. Maksimov, V. F. Tret’yakov, R. M. Talyshinskii,
et al., Neftegazokhimiya 59 (2), 44 (2019).
10. A. L. Maksimov, V. F. Tret’yakov, Yu. N. Litvishkov,
et al., Khim. Probl., No. 1, 135 (2019).
11. S. V. Lebedev, Life and Works (ONTI Khim. Teoret.,
Leningrad, 1938) [in Russian].
CONCLUSIONS
12. V. I. Bykov, Modeling of Critical Phenomena in Chemical
(i) It has been found that DME conversion occurs
in two temperature regions exhibiting different ten-
dencies in affecting the mode parameters; this finding
indicates the existence of different mechanisms of the
reaction and the presence of an SSM.
(ii) The presence of an SSM is evidenced by the
occurrence of a hysteresis loop between the detected
temperature regions of the reaction in the temperature
range of 380–420°C.
Kinetics (KomKniga, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].
13. G. S. Yablonskii, V. I. Bykov, and A. N. Gorban’, Ki-
netic Models of Catalytic Reactions (Nauka, Novosi-
birsk, 1983) [in Russian].
14. B. S. Gudkov, A. N. Subbotin, and V. I. Yakerson, Tem-
perature Hysteresis in Heterogeneous Catalysis (Khimi-
ya, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].
15. A. I. Boyarinov, Multiplicity of Steady States in the Mix-
er–Reactor–Separation Unit System (Khimiya, Mos-
cow, 1982) [in Russian].
16. S. N. Khadzhiev, V. F. Tret’yakov, A. M. Ilolov, and
R. M. Talyshinskii, Nanotekhnol., Nauka Proizvod. 1
(10), 33 (2015).
(iii) The revealed steady states are characterized by
stability, which is enhanced upon the initiation of the
process by hydrogen peroxide.
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY Vol. 60 No. 7 2020