Dehydrogenative Coupling of Stannanes
Organometallics, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2000 449
reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in diethyl
ether and filtered over a 5 cm Celite pad placed in a pipet.
The solvent was then removed in vacuo, affording complex 2b
as a yellow-orange air-stable powder (1.33 g, yield 72%). IR
homogeneous bimetallic catalysis and contributes to a
better understanding of the influence of a metal center
(Fe) on the reactivity of the adjacent metal (Pd).38
1
(KBr): 1955 m, 1895 s, 1873 vs cm-1. H NMR (C6D6, 298 K;
Exp er im en ta l Section
for the labeling of the allyl protons, see below): δ 0.49 (s, 18H,
3
OSiMe3), 2.82 (d, 1H, J (H-H) ) 11.25 Hz, allyl H3), 3.11 (d,
All the reactions and manipulations were carried out under
an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen using standard
Schlenk-tube techniques. Solvents were dried and distilled
under nitrogen before use: hexane and toluene over sodium,
tetrahydrofuran and diethyl ether over sodium-benzophenone,
dichloromethane over phosphorus pentoxide. Nitrogen (Air
liquide, R-grade) was passed through BASF R3-11 catalyst and
molecular sieve columns to remove residual oxygen and water.
Elemental C, H, and N analyses were performed by the Service
de microanalyses du CNRS (ULP Strasbourg). Infrared spectra
were recorded on a IFS 66 Bruker FT-IR spectrometer. The
1H and 31P{1H} spectra were recorded at 300.1 and 121.5 MHz,
respectively, on a Bruker AM300 instrument and the 119Sn
NMR spectra at 149 MHz on a Bruker AC400 instrument. Fe-
(CO)5 was obtained from Aldrich, and HSiMe(OSiMe3)2 was
provided by Rhoˆne-Poulenc Spe´cialite´s Chimiques; both were
used as received. The complexes [Pd(η3-allyl)(µ-Cl)]2,39 1a ,31
2a ,32 3a ,33 and 3b32 were prepared according to published
procedures. Ph3SnH was obtained by reduction of Ph3SnCl
with LiAlH4 in diethyl ether.40 nBu3SnH was a commercial
sample (Lancaster) and was used as received. Experimental
errors on the TON and TOF values have been estimated to
5%; values given have been rounded off.
1H, 3J (H-H) ) 12.85 Hz, allyl H2), 3.66 (d, 1H, 3J (H-H) )
6.26 Hz, allyl H4), 4.29 (br, 1H, allyl H1), 5.04 (m, 1H, allyl
H5), 6.12-8.30 (m, 14H, aromatics). 31P{1H} NMR (C6D6, 298
K): 73.3. Anal. Calcd for C30H40FeNO5PPdSi3: C, 46.67; H,
5.22; N, 1.81. Found: C, 46.94; H, 5.25; N, 1.86.
Deh yd r ogen a tive Cou p lin g of P h 3Sn H Ca ta lyzed by
1a , 2a ,b , a n d 3a ,b . Gen er a l P r oced u r e. A Schlenk flask
equipped with a stirring bar and a serum cap was charged
with 4.00 g of Ph3SnH (11.4 mmol) in 15 mL of CH2Cl2 and
was placed in a water bath at 293 K.
Syn th esis of [(OC)3F e{SiMe(OSiMe3)2}(µ-P h 2P p y)P d -
(η3-a llyl)] (2b). A magnetically stirred solution of [Fe(CO)5]
(1.57 mL, 12 mmol) and HSiMe(OSiMe3)2 (5.00 g, 22.5 mmol)
in hexane (100 mL) was irradiated in a 2-propanol-cooled
photochemical reactor at 283 K for ca. 4 h. Irradiation with a
mercury lamp (180 W, TQ 150, Hereaus) was stopped when
the ν(CO) absorptions of [Fe(CO)5] (2001 and 2023 cm-1) had
almost completely disappeared. The resulting complex, cis-
[HFe{SiMe(OSiMe3)2}(CO)4] (ν(CO) (hexane) 2096 m, 2032 sh,
2026 vs, 2013 vs cm-1), was not isolated, and the resulting
pale yellow mixture was added immediately to a toluene
solution (50 mL) of (2-diphenylphosphino)pyridine (2.89 g, 11
mmol) in two portions. After each addition the CO evolved was
removed under reduced pressure for 1 min. The solution was
stirred for 5 min at room temperature and then placed at -20
°C for 2-3 days, which afforded mer-[HFe(CO)3{SiMe(O-
SiMe3)2}(Ph2Ppy-P)] (4) as a pale brown air- and moisture-
sensitive solid (4.40 g, yield 64%), which was rapidly engaged
in further reactions. IR (toluene): 2051 w, 1987 s, 1975 vs
H2 Mon itor in g (2a ,b a n d 3b). When the volume of H2
released was monitored, the procedure was as follows: the
Schlenk flask was fitted onto a gas buret and 1.0 mL of a 0.1
mM solution of catalyst (10-4 mmol) was rapidly added to the
reaction mixture via syringe through the serum cap. The
volume of H2 released was directly read on the graduated
buret, taking into account the content of the syringe. The
turnover numbers were calculated by the following equation:
TON ) moles of H2/mol of catalyst, with moles of H2 being
determined by applying the gas equation: PV ) nRT. Each
experiment was repeated at least three times, and the mean
values were used for the plots. When the reaction was over,
the volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was
washed with Et2O, affording Ph6Sn2 as a white solid (mp 225-
1
235 °C;41,42 the H NMR spectrum only showed signals in the
aromatic region). The TON determined from the amount of
Ph6Sn2 recovered was in all cases in good accordance with that
determined from the volumes of H2.
P h 6Sn 2 Mon itor in g (1a a n d 3a ). When the formation of
Ph6Sn2 was monitored, the procedure was as follows: a battery
of five Schlenk tubes was prepared as described above, except
that they were not connected to gas burets. The catalyst was
then added, and the reaction mixtures were successively
quenched at t ) 1, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h by addition of water. The
volatiles were removed under reduced pressure, and the
residue was washed with Et2O, affording pure Ph6Sn2 as a
white solid, which was weighed. The turnover numbers were
determined by the following equation: TON ) (moles of Ph6-
Sn2)/(moles of catalyst). The purity of Ph6Sn2 was controlled
by 119Sn NMR spectroscopy (149 MHz, CH2Cl2/C6D6): δ -143.7
ppm with satellites, similar to the literature value of -144
ppm (CDCl3).43 A catalytic reaction was carried out in only 5
mL of CH2Cl2 in order to obtain a concentrated supernatant
solution, which was examined by 119Sn NMR spectroscopy
before quenching. It contained more than 88% Ph6Sn2 and
small amounts of Ph3SnCl (δ -44.7 ppm) and Ph3SnH (δ -165
cm-1. H NMR (C6D6, 298 K): δ -8.87 (d, J (P-H) ) 26 Hz,
1H, Fe-H), 0.31 (s, 18H, OSiMe3), 0.93 (s, 3H, Fe-SiMe), 6.3-
8.5 (m, 14H, aromatics). 31P{1H} NMR (C6D6, 298 K): 63.2.
Solid complex 4 (1.50 g, 2.4 mmol) was added to a suspen-
sion of excess KH in THF (20 mL). An immediate gas evolution
was noticed (H2), whereupon the color darkened. The formation
of K[Fe{SiMe(OSiMe3)2}(CO)3(Ph2Ppy-P)] (5) was complete
after ca. 30 min. The solution was then filtered over a 1 cm
Celite pad and slowly added to a THF solution (10 mL) of [Pd-
(η3-allyl)(µ-Cl)]2 (0.44 g, 1.2 mmol) at 233 K. The reaction
mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 1 h
before it was filtered. The volatiles were removed under
1
2
(38) (a) Braunstein, P.; Rose´, J . In Comprehensive Organometallic
Chemistry II; Abel, E. W., Stone, F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.;
Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1995; Vol. 10, pp 351-385. (b) Braunstein,
P.; Rose´, J . In Metal Clusters in Chemistry; Braunstein, P., Oro, L. A.,
Raithby, P. R., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1999; Vol. 2,
pp 616-677. (c) Braunstein, P.; Knorr, M.; Stern, C. Coord. Chem. Rev.
1998, 178-180, 903.
(39) Sakakibara, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Sakai, S.; Ishii, Y. J . Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1969, 396.
(40) Kuivila, H. G.; Sawyer, A. K.; Armour, A. G. J . Org. Chem. 1961,
26, 1426.
(41) Tamborski, C.; Ford, F. E.; Soloski, E. J . J . Org. Chem. 1963,
28, 237.
(42) Gilman, H.; Rosenberg, S. D. J . Org. Chem. 1953, 18, 1554.
(43) Adams, S.; Dra¨ger, M.; Mathiasch, B. J . Organomet. Chem.
1987, 326, 173.