LETTER
Rhodium(I) Chloride Catalyzed Hydroboration of Vinylarenes
3233
1
994, 116, 4062. (g) Fernandez, E.; Maeda, K.; Hooper,
HBpin
[RhX(cod)]2 (5 mol% Rh)
DPPB (6 mol%)
M. W.; Brown, J. M. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1840.
O
O
(h) Demay, S.; Volant, F.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 1235. (i) Kwong, F. Y.; Yang, Q.; Mak,
T. C. W.; Chan, A. S. C.; Chan, K. S. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 2769. (j) Crudden, C. M.; Edwards, D. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 4695.
(
1.2 equiv)
+
(
R)-PPY* (6 mol%)
B
*
DCE, r.t., time
Ph
1
a
2a
+
(
2) Endo, K.; Hirokami, M.; Shibata, T. Organometallics 2008,
3a
27, 5390.
N
X = Cl, 40 min:
a 19%, 10% ee
a 36%
(3) (a) Westcott, S. A.; Blom, H. P.; Marder, T. B.; Baker, R. T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8863. (b) Doucet, H.;
2
3
N
Fernandez, E.; Layzell, T. P.; Brown, J. M. Chem. Eur. J.
Fe
X = OAc, 10 min:
a 80%, 13% ee
a 18%
1
999, 5, 1320. (c) Chen, A.; Ren, L.; Crudden, C. M. J. Org.
Me
Me
Me
Me
2
3
Chem. 1999, 64, 9704. (d) Murata, M.; Kawakita, K.;
Asana, T.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
Me
2
002, 75, 825. (e) Crudden, C. M.; Hleba, Y. B.; Chen, A. C.
(
R)-PPY*
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9200. (f) Segarra, A. M.;
Daura-Oller, E.; Claver, C.; Poblet, J. M.; Bo, C.; Fernández,
E. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 6456. (g) Moteki, S. A.; Wu, D.;
Chandra, K. L.; Reddy, D. S.; Takacs, J. M. Org. Lett. 2006,
Scheme 2 Chiral DMAP analogue for asymmetric induction
8
, 3097. (h) Carroll, A.-M.; O’Sullivan, T. P.; Guiry, P. J.
clarify the exact mechanism of Rh(I)-catalyzed hydrobo-
ration, which is not yet settled due to the intriguing de-
bates to date. Further investigations to reveal the special
features of the present Rh complex are currently under-
way in our laboratory, for hydroboration as well as for
other catalytic reactions.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 609. (i) Edwards, D. R.;
Hleba, Y. B.; Lata, C. J.; Calhoun, L. A.; Crudden, C. M.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7799.
(
(
4) The preliminary examination for hydroboration typically
proceeds regioselectively in the presence of DPPB as a
ligand. Other ligands often diminished the regioselectivity;
see refs. 1c, 2, and 3e.
5) The reaction with catecholborane (HBcat) for 10 min gave a
regioisomeric mixture of 1-phenylethanol and 2-
phenylethanol in 83% yield with 77:23 ratio after the
oxidation of the crude boronate compounds.
I
Rh Cl–DPPB–DMAP Catalyzed Hydroboration of Vinylar-
enes; Typical Procedure
(
6) (a) Westcott, S.; Marder, T. B. Organometallics 1993, 12,
To a mixture of [RhCl(cod)] (12.3 mg, 0.025 mmol, 5 mol% Rh),
2
975. (b) Brown, J. M.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
DPPB (25.6 mg, 0.06 mmol, 6.0 mol%), and DMAP (7.4 mg, 0.06
mmol, 6.0 mol%) in DCE (1 mL) were added styrene 1a (104 mg,
1994, 116, 866.
(
7) The reaction of 1,2-disubstituted olefin, such as cis-stilbene,
gave lower yield along with the formation of reduction
product. The reaction of 1-hexene under the same reaction
conditions for 10 min as entry 6 in Table 1 gave the linear
product in 65% yield (unoptimized).
8) These reactions without DMAP additive gave the
corresponding products as a mixture of 2g and 3g in 29%
yield with 21:79 ratio and 2h and 3h in 8% yield with 13:87
ratio.
1
.0 mmol) and pinacolborane (153.6 mg, 1.2 mmol, 1.2 equiv) at r.t.
The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 10 min and filtered
through a pad of silica gel with Et O (50 mL). The crude mixture
2
1
was concentrated to dryness. The H NMR analysis with 1,1,2,2-tet-
rachloroethane as an internal standard suggested that the yield is
(
9
8% and 2a/3a ratio is >98:2. The purification by column chroma-
tography (silica gel, 5% EtOAc in hexane) gave the product 2a in
7% yield (202 mg, 0.87 mmol) as colorless oil. All products 2a–i
8
are known compounds and analytical data matched the results in the
literature.2
,3
(9) (a) Fu, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 542. (b) Fu, G. C.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 853.
(
10) The ESI-MS analyses of the mixture of [RhCl(cod)] , DPPB
2
Acknowledgment
(2 equiv), and DMAP (4 equiv) gave a single peak as a [Rh
+
+
DPPB + (DMAP) ] (m/z calcd: 773.2 (100%); found:
2
K.E. thanks the Teijin Pharma Award in Synthetic Organic Chemi-
stry, Japan.
7
73.3). Thus, the coordination of DMAP to Rh(I) center is
31
probable under the present catalysis. The P NMR analysis
in CDCl (phosphoric acid as external reference) of a
3
mixture of [RhCl(cod)] , DPPB (2 equiv), and DMAP (4
2
References and Notes
equiv) gave a single peak at d = 18.64 (d, J
= 99.2 Hz,
, DPPB (2 equiv), and
Rh–P
(
1) (a) Hayashi, T. In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis,
Vol. 1; Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A.; Yamamoto, H., Eds.;
Springer: New York, 1999, 349. (b) Hayashi, T.;
2 P). A mixture of [RhCl(cod)]
2
DMAP (2 equiv) gave four peaks at d = 20.85 (d, JRh–P
=
110.2 Hz), 20.69 (d, JRh–P = 110.2 Hz), 17.98 (d, JRh–P = 101
Hz), 17.82 (d, JRh–P = 101 Hz). In contrast, a mixture of
Matsumoto, Y.; Ito, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3426.
(
c) Hayashi, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ito, Y. Tetrahedron:
[RhCl(cod)]
specified). These results offer the formation of monomeric
[Rh(dppb)(dmap) ]Cl as an intermediate. We assume that
2
and DPPB (2 equiv) gave many peaks (not
Asymmetry 1991, 2, 601. (d) Tucker, C. E.; Davidson, J.;
Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3482. (e) Brown,
J. M.; Hulmes, D. E.; Layzell, T. P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1993, 1673. (f) Togni, A.; Breutel, C.; Schnyder,
A.; Spindler, F.; Landert, H.; Tijani, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
the strong s-donation ability of DMAP is favorable, but the
details should be examined to determine the role of DMAP.
Synlett 2008, No. 20, 3231–3233 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York