SCHEME 1
Syn th esis of Su lfoxid es by th e Hyd r ogen
P er oxid e In d u ced Oxid a tion of Su lfid es
Ca ta lyzed by Ir on
Tetr a k is(p en ta flu or op h en yl)p or p h yr in :
Scop e a n d Ch em oselectivity
considered and the actual merit of this system for the
synthesis of sulfoxides remains therefore unassessed.
In view of the general and continuous interest for the
oxidation of sulfides6 and particularly for the develop-
ment of synthetic methods for the selective conversion
of sulfides into sulfoxides7 and the use of H2O2 as an
environmental benign oxidant, we have considered it
worthwhile to carry out a detailed investigation on the
oxidation of sulfides by H2O2 in ethanol catalyzed by
F20TPPFe, with the aim of acquiring information on the
scope and chemoselectivity of the process. The com-
mercially available F20TPPFe was the iron porphyrin of
choice on the basis of the Ruasse’s results5 and also
because a recent study by Nam and co-workers8 estab-
lished that this iron porphyrin is the most effective also
in the H2O2-induced epoxidation of alkenes in protic
solvents. The results of this investigation are reported
herewith.
For the synthesis of sulfoxides, sulfoxidations were
carried out by using equimolar concentrations of H2O2
(6 mL of a 1 M solution in ethanol) and substrate (6.0
mmol in 20 mL of ethanol) at room temperature. The
concentration of F20TPPFe was extremely small ranging
from 0.03% to 0.09% with respect to that of the substrate.
The H2O2 solution was slowly added to that of the
substrate during 1 min with a syringe and the mixture
was stirred for 3 min, then sodium dithionite was added.
After the solvent was removed, chromatography of the
residue on silica gel provided excellent yields of isolated
pure sulfoxide which were close to those determined by
GC or 1H NMR on the crude reaction mixture. The
sulfides investigated and the sulfoxide yields are reported
in Table 1.
Enrico Baciocchi,* Maria Francesca Gerini, and
Andrea Lapi
Dipartimento di Chimica, Universita` degli Studi di Roma
“La Sapienza”, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
enrico.baciocchi@uniroma1.it
Received J anuary 21, 2004
Abstr a ct: The oxidation of sulfides with H2O2 catalyzed by
iron tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin in EtOH is an
efficient and chemoselective process. With a catalyst con-
centration 0.03-0.09% of that of the substrate, sulfoxides
are obtained with yields generally around 90-95% of
isolated product. With vinyl and allyl sulfides, no epoxidation
is observed. With a catalyst concentration between 0.09%
and 0.25% of that of the substrate, sulfones are obtained in
almost quantitative yield and with the same high chemose-
lectivity observed in the synthesis of sulfoxides.
The capacity of iron tetraarylporphyrins to catalyze the
oxidation of sulfides by H2O2, presumably through the
formation of the iron oxo complex P•+Fe(IV)dO as the
active species (Scheme 1, P ) tetraarylporphyrin), has
been long known.1
However, the pioneering study by Oae and co-workers3
and the few other studies that dealt later with this
oxidizing system4 were mainly focused on its mechanistic
aspects (e.g., oxygen vs electron-transfer mechanisms)
with little or no concern about its possible practical
application in organic synthesis. Very recently, Ruasse’s
group reported interesting results on the exploitation of
Looking at the results reported in Table 1, the first
observation is that the reaction is very efficient affording
yields of sulfoxide generally around 90% with a very low
catalyst/substrate ratio (from 1/3300 to 1/1100) and with
a reaction time as short as 4 min. The selectivity with
respect to the formation of sulfone is also very high as
this catalytic system for mustard decontamination.5
A
number of iron tetraarylporphyrins were examined as
catalysts for the H2O2-induced oxidation of mustard
models to the corresponding sulfones. A high catalytic
efficiency was observed, particularly with iron tetrakis-
(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin (F20TPPFe). However, given
the aim of the study, very few (specific) substrates were
1
the yields of sulfone, determined by GC or H NMR, are
only between 1% and 4%. More importantly, such small
amounts of sulfone did not cause significant problems in
preparative experiments, where high yields of pure
sulfoxide were obtained.
Going more into detail, it can be observed that in the
series of aryl methyl sulfides (Table 1, entries 1-4), high
yields of the sulfoxide are also found when the strong
electron-withdrawing group (EWG) CN is present in the
* Address correspondence to this author. Phone: +39-06-49913711.
Fax: +39-06-490421..
(1) However, there is a lively debate about the structure of the active
species in oxidation catalyzed by iron porphyrins. Another possibility
is that, when the oxidant is H2O2, the active species structure would
be P-Fe(III)-O-OH.2
(2) Wang, S. H.; Mandimutsira, B. S.; Todd, R.; Ramdhanie, B.; Fox,
J . P.; Goldberg, D. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 18-19.
(3) Oae, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Fujimori, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23,
1189-1192.
(4) (a) Baciocchi, E.; Lanzalunga, O.; Marconi, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 9771-9774. (b) Baciocchi, E.; Lanzalunga, O.; Pirozzi, B.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 12287-12298. (c) Baciocchi, E.; Gerini, M. F.;
Lanzalunga, O.; Lapi, A.; Lo Piparo, M. G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003,
1, 422-426.
(5) (a) Marques, A.; Di Matteo, M.; Ruasse, M.-F. Can. J . Chem.
1998, 16, 770-775. (b) Marques, A.; Marin, M.; Ruasse, M.-F. J . Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 7588-7595.
(6) Chu, J .-W.; Trou, B. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 900-908.
(7) (a) Choi, S.; Yang, J .-D.; J i, M.; Choi, H.; Kee, M.; Ahn, K.-H.;
Byeon, S.-H.; Baik, W.; Koo, S. J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8192-8198.
(b) Gelalcha, F. G.; Schulze, B. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8400-8406.
(c) Matteucci, M.; Bhalay, G.; Bradley, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 235-
237. (d) Linde´n, A. A.; Kru¨ger, L.; Ba¨ckvall, J .-E. J . Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 5890-5896.
(8) Nam, W.; Oh, S.-Y.; Sun, Y. J .; Kim, J .; Kim, W.-K.; Woo, S. K.;
Shin, W. J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7903-7906.
10.1021/jo049879h CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/20/2004
3586
J . Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3586-3589