Lower conversion in the phenylacetate lithium enolate
aminations implicates competing proton transfer from the
reagent 2 to quench the enolate. One possibility is internal
proton transfer in the complex 6, a scenario that is reminis-
and was also noted in the original report describing the
synthesis of 1 and 2.2a
To establish temperature and reactivity limits, the elec-
trophilic amination of ethyl phenylacetate/KOtBu using
reagent 2 was explored at -78 °C (Table 3). Reactions
Table 3. Ethyl Phenyl Acetate Amination with 2 at -78 °C
cent of the internal proton return phenomenon observed in
reactions of amine-containing lithium enolates with other
electrophiles.11 Simple intermolecular proton transfer is not
ruled out, but the internal pathway would be consistent with
the higher conversions observed for enolates containing the
less Lewis acidic sodium or potassium ions.
entry reagent time (h) conversion (%) additive concn (M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
6
2
6
2
4
6
35
76
44
55
57
70
27
none
none
DMF
DMF
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
none
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.01
The prospects for simple proton transfer from the reagent
2 to the ester enolate depend on the relative acidities in THF,
as well as on kinetic factors. Values for pKa’s in the range
of 22-2412 for phenylacetate ester or phenylacetonitrile
anions have been reported, but little is known about
O-substituted hydroxylamine pKa's in organic solvents. The
closest analogy (PhNHOBn; DMSO pKa ) 23.5)13 provides
some indication that proton transfer from 2 to the enolate
may be possible. Furthermore, prior studies using O-(2,4-
dinitrophenyl)hydroxylamine had found evidence for N-H
deprotonation by the lithium enolate of methyl phenylpro-
pionate,5a followed by self-amination of the reagent and
fragmentation to diimide.14 From 2, the analogous decom-
position process would lead to Ar2P(O)OH, a product that
was detected by ESMS in partly decomposed samples of 2
conducted at 0.10 M resulted in heterogeneous mixtures and
ca. 30% product formation after 2 h. When sufficient THF
was added to dissolve the reagent 2 (ca. 0.01 M), improved
conversions were found if sufficient time was allowed to
compensate for high dilution in the second-order amination
step (entries 1 and 2).
Other solvents were investigated to improve solubility.
Reagent 2 was found to be readily soluble in DMF, but
aminations conducted using 1.1 equiv of 2 with DMF as a
cosolvent in THF at -78 °C gave lower conversions even
though the conditions were homogeneous (entries 3 and 4).
On the other hand, addition of ca. 33% CH2Cl2 resulted in
good conversion and a faster reaction at 0.05 M. For
comparison, low-temperature electrophilic amination was
also attempted using reagent 1. Although reaction mixtures
remained heterogeneous (0.01 M) at -78 °C using 1, some
conversion to product was observed (Table 3, entry 7). These
findings suggest that there is little intrinsic reactivity dif-
ference between 1 and 2 and that the substantial differences
in % conversion reflect differences in the rate of self-
destruction compared to amination for reagent in solution
(2) or suspension (1).
Having established that 2 is suitable for low-temperature
aminations of the stabilized phenylacetate enolate, we
compared 2 with the original reagent 1 under simple room-
temperature amination conditions (Table 4; ca. 0.1 M,
heterogeneous conditions). Similar conditions had been used
by Boche et al., although the latter workers used LDA as
the base,2b whereas our experiments were conducted using
KOtBu or NaH. Table 4 summarizes representative amina-
tions of malonates, phenylacetates, and phenylacetonitriles
using reagents 2 (column 2) and 33d (column 3) and also
lists literature data obtained with reagent 1 (column 1).2b,c
Reagent 3 (O-(4-nitrobenzoyl)-hydroxylamine) proved to be
quite effective for amination of the more highly stabilized
enolates and is probably the reagent of choice for this purpose
(9) Representative Experimental Procedure. CAUTION! Although we
have not experienced, and are not aware of, detonations in the preparation
or use of reagents 1, 2, or 3, the related O-(mesitylsulfonyl)hydroxylamine
is explosive3a-c and detonation of O-dinitrophenylhydroxylamine in the
presence of KH has been reported.5a In view of this history, reagents 1-3
must be regarded as potential explosives, especially when the solid reagents
are mixed with strong base. Into a flame-dried 25-mL flask equipped with
a magnetic stir bar was dissolved 41 mg (0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) of ethyl
phenylacetate in THF (3.0 mL), and the mixture was cooled to -78 °C. A
freshly prepared solution of 31 mg (0.28 mmol, 1.1 equiv) of KOtBu in
THF (2.0 mL) was added dropwise via syringe, and the resulting solution
was allowed to stir for 15 min at -78 °C. Next, 81 mg (0.28 mmol, 1.1
equiv) of reagent 2 was added in one portion as a solid, and the mixture
was slowly allowed to reach 23 °C and stir overnight. To the solution was
added 71 µL (0.75 mmol, 3.0 equiv) of Ac2O and 210 µL (1.5 mmol, 6.0
equiv) of Et3N sequentially via syringe, and the mixture was allowed to
stir an additional 1 h at 23 °C. The solution was diluted with Et2O (20 mL)
and a saturated solution of ammonium chloride (30 mL). The layers were
separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (2 × 30 mL).
The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated (rotary
evaporator), and the crude oil was purified by flash chromatography (1:1
ethyl acetate/hexanes) to give 37 mg of acetamide (67%) as a colorless oil.
Analytical TLC: Rf 0.20 (1:1 ethyl acetate/hexanes).
(10) Schwesinger, R.; Schlemper, H.; Hasenfratz, C.; Willaredt, J.;
Dambacher, T.; Breuer, T.; Ottaway, C.; Fletschinger, M.; Boele, J.; Fritz,
H.; Putzas, D.; Rotter, H. W.; Bordwell, F. G.; Satish, A. V.; Ji, G.-Z.;
Peters, E.-M.; Peters, K.; von Schnering, H. G.; Walz, L. Liebigs Ann. 1996,
1055.
(11) Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1624.
(12) (a) Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456. (b) Kaufman,
M. J.; Streitwieser, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6092.
(13) Hughes, M. N.; Nicklin, H. G.; Shrimanker, K. J. Chem. Soc. (A)
1971, 3485. Bordwell, F. G.; Liu, W.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
8777.
(14) Diimide formation was deduced from the formation of olefin
hydrogenation products; see ref 5a.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 22, 2003
4189