1
16
Label-free LDHA assays / E. VanderPorten et al. / Anal. Biochem. 441 (2013) 115–122
The enzymatic reaction catalyzed by LDH has been character-
1536-Well kinetic LDHA FDSS assay for primary HTS and IC50
confirmation
ized since the 1960s, with numerous publications primarily using
the detection of NADH absorbance or intrinsic fluorescence. The
enzyme family is capable of carrying out both the forward (pyru-
vate to lactate) and reverse (lactate to pyruvate) reactions, with
the preference varying among different LDH isoforms [13,14]. Fur-
thermore, the forward enzymatic reaction has been shown to pro-
ceed as an ordered reaction, with the enzyme binding NADH first
followed by the substrate, pyruvate [13,14]. Because of the ability
to use NADH or NAD+ as substrate, LDH was used extensively as
The HTS screen was conducted on a BioCel 900 automated sys-
tem outfitted with a Direct Drive Robot (Agilent Automation Solu-
tions, Santa Clara, CA, USA). An FDSS (Functional Drug Screening
System) 7000 kinetic fluorescence reader with onboard dispenser
(Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) was integrated with this sys-
tem, enabling a fully automated workflow, including reagent addi-
tions, incubations, and detection.
Prior to the start of the screening campaign, assay-ready plates
were prepared using a dedicated plate replication automation sys-
tem. Using an Echo 555 acoustic dispenser (Labcyte, Sunnyvale, CA,
USA), 50 nl per well of 1 mM compound was spotted onto 1536-
well low-base, clear-bottom black microplates (Brooks Life Science
Systems, Poway, CA, USA) and sealed using an Agilent PlateLoc
microplate sealer to prevent evaporation. The sealed plates were
then loaded onto the BioCel for processing. The plate seal was re-
moved using an XPeel automated microplate seal removal device
+
coupling enzymes for NADH or NAD detection. Even though the
elevated expression of LDH in cancer had been noted a few dec-
ades ago [15], it was not until 2006 when Fantin and coworkers
demonstrated the link between LDHA and tumor metabolism
[
16] that the LDH enzyme was transformed from a supporting role
of being used in coupling enzyme assays to center stage and being
used as a potential therapeutic target for cancer. This also explains
in part why there has been a lack of validated inhibitors for LDH
despite the fact that this enzyme has been well characterized for
decades. Until recent months, the only validated inhibitor known
to LDH is a small organic acid, oxamate, which is a pyruvate mi-
metic with a reported biochemical IC50 ranging from 17 to
(Brooks Life Science Systems), followed by the addition of 6 ll of
suspension buffer containing 50 mM Hepes buffer (pH 7.2), 0.01%
Triton X-100, and 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) using a MultiDrop
Combi dispenser (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Next,
1
50 lM, depending on the assay conditions [17,18]. This weak
and nonselective inhibitor that has poor cell permeability is less
than an ideal tool compound for target validation in cells or
in vivo.
2 ll of 250 lM NADH with 10 nM C-terminally His-tagged full-
length LDHA enzyme in reaction buffer A (50 mM Hepes [pH
7.2], 0.01% Triton X-100, and 0.1% BGG) was added using a Bio-
RAPTR dispenser (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The
full-length LDHA (A2-F332) was purified as a tetramer from an
Escherichia coli expression system using nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid
(Ni–NTA) and size exclusion chromatography and stored as ali-
quots in storage buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 8.5], 150 mM NaCl, 45%
glycerol, and 0.25 mM TCEP) at ꢀ80 °C. For control inhibition,
With an increasing interest in exploring metabolic pathways
for potential cancer therapeutic strategies, we sought to develop
assay platforms that are amenable to ultra-high-throughput
screening (uHTS) to identify chemical tool compounds with vari-
ous mechanisms to probe the effect of LDH inhibition on cancer
cell growth. LDHA has been implicated in disease progression
for tumor cells that rely on glycolytic flux to provide the requisite
fast energy source. LDHA is expressed to efficiently recycle NADH
250 lM oxamate was included in the NADH and LDHA mixture.
The plate was then centrifuged using a VSpin Microplate Centri-
fuge (Agilent Automation Solutions). Following a 10-min incuba-
tion at room temperature, the plate was loaded into the FDSS
7000 reader for an initial baseline read of 5 s. The onboard 1536-
well pipette head of the FDSS 7000 was then used to transfer
+
back to NAD to continue fueling glycolysis; thus, the enzyme has
been found to drive the reaction in the forward direction (i.e.,
+
pyruvate to lactate and NADH to NAD ) [16,19]. Using LDHA that
carries out predominantly the forward reaction as a model target,
here we describe a robust 1536-well NADH fluorescence kinetic
assay for screening and characterizing LDHA inhibitors. To avoid
the potential for fluorescence interference from the use of NADH
fluorescence as a readout, we optimized the protocol to readily
identify compound fluorescence interference observed at the
excitation and emission wavelengths of NADH. We also describe
a label-free mass spectrometric assay set up to monitor the con-
version of pyruvate to lactate by LDHA. This label-free assay was
complementary to the higher throughput NADH fluorescence as-
say because it detected pyruvate to lactate conversion and was
effective in further eliminating fluorescence artifacts as well as
in identifying additional false positive mechanisms of inhibition.
Finally, taking advantage of the well-characterized ordered
enzyme reaction, the primary screening assay was designed to
capture, and has successfully identified, uncompetitive or non-
competitive inhibitors with the NADH–LDHA complex in addition
to conventional inhibitors that are competitive with the
substrates.
2 ll of 250 lM pyruvate in reaction buffer A from an AutoFill refill-
ing reservoir (Acorn Instruments, South San Francisco, CA, USA) to
the assay plates. The final concentration of test compound in the
screen was 5 lM. Fluorescence was measured at an excitation
wavelength of 340 nm and an emission wavelength of 482 nm,
with one read taking place each second for a total of 3 min.
The kinetic traces were analyzed by in a Genedata Screener
Kinetic Analyzer (Basel, Switzerland) using the robust slope curve
fit. The slopes of the kinetic traces were calculated using a time-
frame of 60 to 120 s of the aggregated data. The baseline NADH
fluorescence intensity was typically measured at 300 to 400 rela-
tive fluorescence units (RFU). Fluorescent compounds with RFU
values greater than 500, which was the upper limit of the linear
detection range in the FDSS 7000, were excluded. The remaining
compounds with more than 50% inhibition were selected for IC50
confirmation. A hit rate of less than 0.1% was achieved after remov-
0
ing fluorescent artifacts. Average plate Z scores were 0.7 (% LDHA
activity with enzyme = 99.6 ± 5.8 and without enzyme = 0.3 ± 3.8),
with reproducible NADH fluorescence window and oxamate inhi-
bition from run to run.
Materials and methods
384-Well IC50 confirmation assay using a combination of FDSS 7000
Chemicals
and mass spectrometric methods
NADH was purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN,
USA). Oxamate, pyruvate, bovine gamma globulin (BGG), tris(2-
carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), NaCl, and Triton X-100 were ob-
tained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
IC50 follow-up by the mass spectrometric assay was conducted
with compounds serially diluted in an 8-point dose response in
384-well clear-bottom black microplates. In a final reaction vol-
ume of 50 ll, 0.25 nM LDHA was incubated with 75 lM pyruvate