G Model
CATTOD-9919; No. of Pages9
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
X. Yang et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
on acid/base properties. Long-term stabilities of these catalysts
are still uncertain due to leaching or deactivation in hydrothermal
media.
flow was switched to 10% hydrogen in argon at 50 mL/min and
the TPR was performed from 50 ◦C to 800 ◦C with the temperature
ramp of 30 ◦C/min. Then, the sample was cooled to 30 ◦C in helium
flow before the gas flow was switched to 10% oxygen in helium at
50 mL/min. TPO experiment was performed from 50 ◦C to 800 ◦C
with the same temperature ramp of 30 ◦C/min.
Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of adsorbed NH3
on the catalysts was carried out using the same Chemisorption
Analyser. In a typical NH3 TPD experiment, the catalyst was first
degassed at 900 ◦C for 1 h and then cooled to 100 ◦C in a helium flow.
Afterwards, the gas was switched to 10% ammonia in helium at the
flow rate of 50 mL/min to allow NH3 adsorption for 40 min. The
physisorbed NH3 was removed under helium flow for 30 min. The
NH3 TPD was performed from 50 ◦C to 800 ◦C with the temperature
ramp of 30 ◦C/min.
The Bruker EQUINOX 55 Fourier transform infrared spec-
troscopy (FT-IR) spectrometer with a MCT detector was used for
the characterization. The sample was loaded in a high-temperature
reaction cell (Harrick) located within a DRIFT accessory (Praying
MantisTM, Harrick). The sample was degassed at 550 ◦C for 1 h
under helium in order to remove adsorbed water. After that, FT-
IR spectra (with a resolution of 2 cm−1) were collected from the
sample at 120 ◦C. For pyridine adsorption, small aliquots of pyridine
were subsequently exposed to the sample at 120 ◦C for 15 min. Prior
to the measurement the weakly adsorbed pyridine was removed by
flowing helium at 250 ◦C for 1 h, and the spectra were then collected
at 120 ◦C.
Scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analyses have been carried out using a FEI
Quanta 400 scanning electron microscope (Hillsboro, OR) equipped
with a Thermo NSS-UPS-SEM-INORAN System SIX (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Waltham, MA) for X-ray microanalysis (EDS). For EDS
analysis, the samples were placed on a stub with carbon tape and
the SEM imaging was run at 15 kV. Aqueous solutions collected after
reactions were analyzed by an Optima 3000 DV inductively coupled
plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) (Acme Analytical
Laboratory). All samples for ICP-AES analysis were acidified with
5% Optima HNO3.
hydrothermal media has been the concern plaguing the aqueous-
phase catalysis. Only few metal oxides (such as ZrO2, TiO2 and
␣-Al2O3) exhibit acceptable stabilities in certain biomass con-
version reactions in subcritical water [21–24]. Developing mixed
[25,26]. The redox properties of perovskite metal oxides catalysed
oxides, such as LaMnO3, LaCoO3, LaFe1-xCuxO3, etc., were efficient
catalysts for the wet aerobic oxidation of lignin to aromatic aldehy-
des [38–40]. Escalona et al. used La1-xCexNiO3 to convert guaiacol
to cyclohexanol with a yield of 60% [41]. Li et al. [42] found that Cr
modified LaCo0.8Cu0.2O3, catalysed the production of furfural from
xylan at 160 ◦C. To the best of our knowledge, the application of
perovskite oxide catalysts in the LA production is rarely reported.
Herein, we report that the LaCoO3 perovskite oxide is an efficient
heterogeneous catalyst for the conversion of cellulosic biomass to
LA. For the first time, we found that the redox properties of the
LaCoOx catalyst, which is distinctly different from the acid/base
properties of the prevailing catalysts for the LA production, play
a central role in the conversion of a variety of C3–C6 aldose sugars
and their polysaccharides to LA in subcritical water.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The following reagents and products were used as received:
d-(+)-xylose (99%), d-(+)-glucose (Reagent ACS Grade) and
microcrystalline cellulose were purchased from Acros Organics. l-
(+)-lactic acid (98%), lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate (98%), cobalt
nitrate hexahydrate (98%), fructose (99%), sucrose (99%), lan-
thanum(III) oxide (99.9%), cobalt (II, III) oxide (99.5%) and citric acid
(99%) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.
2.4. Catalytic reaction procedure
Reactions were carried out by suspending the catalyst in a solu-
tion of biomass substrates in DI water in a 100 mL stirred Parr
microreactor. In each reaction, a glass liner was used to prevent
reactants from contacting the metal reactor walls. The liner was
loaded and placed inside the reactor, and the reactor was charged
with 400 psi N2. The reactor was heated at a ramp rate of 10 ◦C/min
until the desired set temperature was reached. During the reaction,
mixing was achieved through an internal propeller operating at 750
RPM. Once the set temperature was attained, the reactor was held
at the set temperature for 1 h and then quenched in an ice bath for
fast cooling. The reactor was then immediately disassembled and
the solid residue was collected for calculation of mass conversion.
The liquid and solid fractions were separated using a centrifuge.
The liquid fraction was collected and used for subsequent chemical
analysis and the solid residues were dried over night at 110 ◦C. The
mass balance was calculated and ensured to be between 98% and
102%.
2.2. Catalyst preparation
In the typical synthesis, 0.2 mol La(NO3)3·6H2O and 0.2 mol
Co(NO3)2·6H2O were dissolved into 50 mL DI water and stirred for
10 min. Then, 0.6 mol citric acid was added into the above solu-
tion and stirred for another 30 min. After that, the solution was
placed into a wide mouth container and dried at 110 ◦C in an oven
overnight. The dried powder was collected and heated to 200 ◦C at
10 ◦C/min for 30 min, then heated to 900 ◦C with the temperature
ramp of 3 ◦C/min, and finally calcined at 900 ◦C for 4 h.
2.3. Catalyst characterization
A PANalytical X’Pert PRO diffractometer with graphite-filtered
Cu K␣ radiation was used to determine the crystalline phases of the
as-synthesized LaCoO3 powder over the 2ꢀ values from 10◦ to 90◦
with the step size of 0.02◦.
The conversion (X), solid residue yield (S.R.) and the product
yield C-% (Y) are calculated using the following equations:
H2 temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) and O2
temperature-programmed (TPO) on the catalysts were car-
ried out using a Micromeritics AutoChem II 2920Chemisorption
Analyzer. In a typical H2 TPR experiment, the catalyst was first
degassed in helium at 900 ◦C for 1 h, following which the temper-
ature was decreased to 30 ◦C in helium flow. Afterwards, the gas
ꢀ
ꢁ
mass of carbon in unreacted biomass
mass of carbon in total biomass
X = 1 −
× 100%
ꢀ
ꢁ
Weight of total dried solid residue − Weight of solid catalyst
S.R. =
× 100%
Initial weight of biomass
Please cite this article in press as: X. Yang, et al., Effect of redox properties of LaCoO3 perovskite catalyst on production of lactic acid