Full Paper
measurements on activated samples (Ru-DEMOF series 1 and 3),
the data were collected at beam line BL9 of the synchrotron radia-
tion facility DELTA at a wavelength of 0.4592 ꢃ by using a two-di-
mensional MAR345 image-plate detector. The sample was filled
into standard capillaries (0.5 mm diameter) in an Ar-filled glovebox
and measured. The data were integrated by using the program
was set at 0.3 mm and the pass energy was fixed at 200 eV for all
the measurements. The overall energy resolution was better than
0.5 eV. A flood gun was used to compensate for the charging ef-
fects. All spectra reported here are calibrated to the C 1s core-level
binding energy of 285 eV. The XP spectra were deconvoluted by
using the CASA XPS program with a mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian
function and Shirley background subtraction. Gas chromatographic
measurements for the Paal–Knorr reaction were performed with an
Agilent Technologies 7890A with flame-ionization detector by
using an HP-5 capillary column (5% phenylmethylpolysiloxane) of
30 m length and 0.32 mm internal diameter and a BP20(WAX)
column of 15 m length and 0.32 mm internal diameter. Thereby,
the samples were measured at high dilution in volatile organic sol-
vents (usually ethanol or acetone).
[33]
package Fit2D
and transformed to the CuKa radiation (l=
1
.54178 ꢃ) used for all other PXRD measurements on reported ma-
terials for convenient comparison. Elemental analysis data were ob-
filled into finger Schlenk flasks in an Ar-filled glovebox and mea-
sured under Ar. FTIR spectra were collected with a Bruker Alpha
FTIR instrument in the ATR geometry with a diamond ATR unit in
ꢀ1
the range 400–4000 cm inside a LABStar MB 10 compact MBraun
glovebox (argon atmosphere). (TEM-)EDX spectra for the composi-
Synthesis of Ru-DEMOFs (1a–1d, 2a–2d, 3a–3d, 4a–4c)
2
tional determination of 4a–4c were recorded with a Tecnai G F20
equipped with a Schottky field-emission gun operated at an accel-
eration voltage of 200 kV at the department of Mechanical Engi-
neering, Ruhr-University Bochum. Liquid-phase H NMR spectra
The materials were synthesized followed by the reported con-
[20]
trolled SBU approach. Mixtures of parent linker H btc and defect
3
1
linker 5-X-ipH [X=OH (1), H (2), NH (3), and Br (4)] together with
2
2
were measured with a Bruker Avance DPX-200 spectrometer at
1.5 molar equivalents of [Ru (OOCCH ) Cl] (0.36 mmol,170 mg)
2 3 4 n
2
93 K in DCl/[D ]DMSO on digested activated MOF samples. CO ad-
were placed in 20 mL Teflon vessels. Subsequently, 4 mL of HPLC-
grade water and 0.7 mL of glacial acetic acid were added. The
molar ratios and amounts of the linkers used in the starting materi-
als are listed in Table S1 of the Supporting Information. The Teflon
reaction vessels were then placed in Teflon-lined stainless steel au-
toclaves. The autoclaves were further sealed and placed in a pre-
heated oven at 433 K for 72 h. Afterwards the autoclaves were
taken out and allowed to cool to room temperature. The resulting
powder products were collected by centrifugation. Afterwards,
they were soaked in HPLC-grade water (ca. 20 mL) and the solvent
was refreshed three times with the same amount of water every
24 h. Finally, the solvent was removed and collected powders were
dried in air at room temperature. The solids were activated by
6
sorption (298 K) and the majority of N (99.999%) sorption (77 K)
2
measurements were performed with a Micromeritics 3Flex instru-
ment. The N2 sorption isotherms of 3a–3d were collected with
a Quantachrome Autosorp-1 MP instrument, optimized protocols,
and N of 99.9995% purity. Experiments on sorption of CO (298 K)
and H (77 K) were conducted with a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 gas-
adsorption analyzer. TGA was performed with a TG/DSC NETZSCH
2
2
2
ꢀ
1
STA 409 PC instrument at a heating rate of 5 Kmin in the tem-
perature range 30–6008C at atmospheric pressure (sample weight
ꢀ
1
5
–10 mg, N (99.999%) gas flow (20 mLmin ). XANES spectra were
2
recorded at the Ru K-edge (22117 eV) by using an Si(311) mono-
chromator at Beamline BL8 of the synchrotron radiation facility
DELTA, TU Dortmund. The samples were filled into 1 mm capillaries
in an Ar-atmosphere glovebox before the measurement. The
XANES data were acquired by using 15 cm ion chamber filled with
Ar as I0, a 15 cm ion chamber filled with Xe as I1, and a 30 cm ion
chamber filled with Xe as I2. Approximately 30 mm above the
sample, a PIN diode captured a relatively wide solid angle of fluo-
rescence radiation. The energy was calibrated by measuring a met-
allic Ru foil as reference simultaneously with each sample scan.
The data processing and analysis were done with the program
ꢀ3
heating at 423 K for 24 h under dynamic vacuum (ca. 10 mbar).
Catalytic reactions
Ethylene dimerization
In a typical run (Supporting Information, Table S10, entry 5), 2.1 mg
of activated Ru-MOF 1c was placed in a 10 mL steel reactor, after
which 0.81 mL of Et
0.09 mL of undecane (0.01m in toluene) were added. After degass-
ing, the reactor was flushed with C (800 psi) and placed in a pre-
AlCl (1m in heptane), 2.1 mL of toluene, and
2
[34]
ATHENA.
For UHV-FTIR measurements, powder samples were
first pressed into a stainless steel grid covered by gold and then
mounted on a sample holder, which was specially designed for
FTIR transmission measurements under UHV conditions. The grid
was cleaned by heating to 850 K to remove all contaminants
formed its during preparation. The base pressure in the measure-
ment chamber was 5ꢂ10 mbar. The optical path inside the IR
spectrometer and the space between the spectrometer and UHV
chamber were also evacuated to avoid adsorption of atmospheric
moisture and thus ensure high sensitivity and stability. The MOF
samples were cleaned in the UHV chamber by heating to 500 K to
remove the contaminants from synthesis and all adsorbed species
such as water and hydroxyl groups. Prior to each exposure, a spec-
trum of the clean sample was recorded as a background reference.
H
2 4
heated oil bath at 808C with stirring for 2 h. Subsequently, the re-
action was stopped and the reactor was cooled at ꢀ78C in a mix-
ture of dry ice and ethylene glycol. Cold distilled water was added
to quench the reaction. The organic layer, kept cold, was then
quickly analyzed by gas chromatography (SRI 8610V GC, 60 mꢂ
0.54 mm internal diameter, 5.0 mm MXT-1 capillary columns) by
using the undecane signal as reference. For other entries, the
amount of catalyst, the reaction temperature, and time were
varied (Supporting Information, Table S10). In case of no additive,
the volume of toluene was changed to 2.91 mL. Other parameters
are the same as described above for Supporting Information, Table
S10, entry 5.
ꢀ
11
The exposure of the sample to CO and CO was carried out by
2
backfilling the measurement chamber through a leak valve. All
UHV-FTIR spectra were collected with 512 scans at a resolution of
Paal–Knorr reaction
ꢀ1
4
cm in transmission mode. XPS measurements were performed
In a typical run, 5 mg of activated Ru-MOF/DEMOF in 0.5 mL of tol-
uene was introduced into 125 mg (1.1 mmol) of 2,5-hexadione and
95 mg (1 mmol) of phenylamine and the mixture stirred at 908C
for 24 h under air. The reaction was monitored by taking aliquots
in a UHV setup equipped with a high-resolution Gammadata-Scien-
ta SES 2002 analyzer. A monochromatic AlKa X-ray source (energy
1
486.6 eV) was used as incident radiation. The analyzer slit width
&
&
Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1 – 12
10
ꢁ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!