3 2
Table 2 Quantitative estimation of acid and base sites on Ti-modified HSZ catalysts by NH - or CO
-TPDa
Base sitesb
Acid sitesb
x Within 673 K
CO (g)/Cat(g)
y Within 440 K
CO (g)/Cat(g)
x Within 673 K
y Within 440 K
NH (g)/Cat(g)
c
c
Sample
2
2
y/x (%)
3
NH (g)/Cat(g)
3
y/x (%)
7
7
7
a
.5% Ti/silicalite(3000)
.5% Ti/HSZ(1900)
.5% Ti/HSZ(68)
0.0104
0.0187
0.0196
0.0080
0.0143
0.0147
76.9
76.6
75.0
0.0129
0.0495
0.0339
0.00956
0.042
0.0233
74.1
85.3
68.7
Thermogravimetric analysis conducted in argon in the range 300–673 K. b The acid or base sites were estimated by the amounts of NH
3 2
or CO desorbed
within each prescribed temperature. c These values, calculated [100 (y/x)] can be regarded as the percentage of weak base or acid sites.
performances were strongly dependent on the Si/Al ratio of the
supports. For 7.5% Ti/HSZ(68) (run 3), propene conversion
was very high (97.8%) and some oxygenates were produced
with CO
was only 3.11%. The 7.5% Ti/HSZ(190) (run 4) also showed
high propene conversion of 95.5% and both CO and the amount
x
and a substantial amount of residue, but the PO yield
x
of residue were decreased, while the selectivities to oxygenates
were increased. In this case the PO yield was 8.90%.
On the other hand, the conversion of propene on 7.5% Ti/
HSZ(1900) was approximately half the propene conversion of
7
.5% Ti/HSZ(190), while selectivities to CO
x
and residue
(0.13%) were dramatically lower than for 7.5% Ti/HSZ(190).
For 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900) (run 5) the selectivity to PO was found
to be 36.3% and major by-products were acetaldehyde (AA) and
hydrocarbons (HC). As a result, the PO yield (17.3%) on
7
7
.5% Ti/HSZ(1900) was twice that of 7.5% Ti/HSZ(190).
.5% Ti/silicalite (3000) (run 6), on the other hand, showed
3
Fig. 1 NH -TPD data for (a) 7.5% Ti/silicalite(3000), (b) 7.5% Ti/
HSZ(1900) and (c) 7.5% Ti/HSZ(68).
much lower propene conversion (1.89%) than 7.5% Ti/
HSZ(1900). Therefore, it is indicated that titanium-modified
HSZ with an Si/Al ratio of 1900 not only has a moderate ability
to activate propene using molecular oxygen, but also properties
suitable for predominant formation of oxygenates (in particular,
PO) over hydrocarbons (HC).
The 15% Ti/HSZ(1900) catalyst (run 7) exhibited higher
propene conversion (78.2%) than 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900), al-
though the PO selectivity was slightly decreased, while HC
selectivity was increased. In this case, the PO yield was 20.4%,
7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900) at 1073 K, higher by 100 K than the
standard calcination temperature (973 K), would result in a
decrease in weak acid sites, while strong acid sites might still be
retained. As a result, propene conversion was decreased to
37.3% and selectivity to hydrocarbon formation (HC) was
raised to 59.7% (Table 1, run 10).
In summary, Ti-modified HSZ(1900) was found to catalyse
the oxidation of propene to oxygenates, such as propene oxide,
by molecular oxygen at 573 K. The catalyst performances are
affected by the Si/Al ratio of the HSZ supports as well as the
presence of titanium. Cooperation between moderate acid
properties of HSZ(1900) and titanium favors oxygenate forma-
tion. It is expected that fine control of acid properties of these
supports and titanium content well enhance the catalyst
performances for propene oxide formation.
conditions2
2 2
10 times those previously reported under O /H
,3
>
and, at least, > 3 times recently reported for Ag-containing
catalyst4,5 or photocatalyst7 systems. At 523 K, the PO
selectivity on 15% Ti/HSZ(1900) was as high as 40.9%, while
the propene conversion was 9.03% (run 8). HSZ(1900) alone
(run 9) showed higher propene conversion and HC selectivity
than 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900), while less selectivity to oxygenates
was observed. This indicated that surface properties for
oxygenate formation were improved by Ti modification.¶
The mechanism of oxidation of propene over Ti/HSZ
catalysts is not clear. However, catalyst performances are
dependent on Si/Al ratio of the HSZ supports (Table 1) and,
therefore, it seems likely that surface acid–base properties are
responsible for the catalyst behavior, in particular, propene
conversion and residue yield. In fact, as shown in Table 2,
Notes and references
† These zeolites are of H-ZSM-5 type where the number in parentheses is
the Si/Al ratio.
‡
The calcined HSZ was evacuated at 673 K for 3 h in order to eliminate a
i
small amount of water. Then, the HSZ was impregnated with Ti(OPr )
4
in
i
Pr OH, followed by addition of H
2
O (25 g) leading to precipitation of
titanium oxide. The sample was then dried at 373 K for 10 h and finally
calcined at 973 K for 3 h.
§
The sample was evacuated at 673 K for 2 h then, after cooling to 373 K,
where NH
metric methods, 7.5% Ti/silicalite(3000) catalyst exhibited
weaker adsorption for NH as well as CO than the other two
3 2
- or CO -TPD was conducted by using thermogravi-
ammonia adsorption on to the surface was allowed to occur to saturation.
Evacuation was then applied for 1 h at the same temperature followed by
thermal gravimetric (TG) analysis. CO adsorption was carried out at 300 K.
¶ The TS-1 catalyst contains 1.68 wt% Ti and an Si/Al ratio of 46,1 in
contrast to 7.5% Ti and Si/Al ratio of 1900 for 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900). TS-1 is
thus less effective for selective PO formation than 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900)
2
catalyst under propene/O .
3
2
2
catalysts; This is in good accordance with much lower propene
conversion of this catalyst relative to the other catalysts (Table
1
, runs 3, 5 and 6).
NH adsorption on 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900) catalyst was slightly
larger than that on 7.5% Ti/HSZ(68), while the amount of CO
adsorbed was similar (Table 2). However, as much as 85.3% of
NH adsorbed on 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900) was found to be
desorbed below 440 K (Table 2, y/x ratio and Fig. 1), whereas
the ratio of NH desorption below 440 K on 7.5% Ti/HSZ(68)
3
2
1 L. Y. Chen, G. K. Chuah and S. Jaenicke, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chemical,
1998, 132, 281; M. G. Clerici, G. Bellussi and U. Romano, J. Catal.,
1991, 129, 159.
3
2
T. Hayashi, K. Tanaka and M. Haruta, Am Chem. Soc., Div. Pet. Chem.,
996, 41, 71.
1
3
3
T. A. Nijhuis, B. J. Huizinga, M. Makkee and J. A. Moulijn, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 1999, 38, 884.
was only 68.7%; These findings indicated that the ratio of
strong to weak acid sites on 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900) is smaller than
that on 7.5% Ti/HSZ(68). This could be consistent with the fact
that the 7.5% Ti/HSZ(1900) catalyst showed lower propene
conversion and smaller amounts of residue product than those
for 7.5% Ti/HSZ(68) (Table 2, runs 3 and 5). The calcination of
4
5
6
S. Yagi and K. Sugita, Jap. Pat., JP 09-291084 A2, 1997.
A. P. Kahn, US Pat., US 1997-903127, 30 July 1997.
C. Murata, K. E. Bere, T. Hayakawa, S. Hamakawa, K. Suzuki and K.
Matano, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 2001, 72, 57.
7 A. Yoshida, C. Murata and T. Hattori, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1551.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1356–1357
1357