Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
M. Dalil et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 522 (2016) 80–89
81
only decreased the coking rate, but also improved the acrolein
selectivity. Additionally, the catalyst maintained its activity and
reduced the by-products such as acetol and phenol. Few studies
have focused on the effect of coke formation on catalyst perfor-
mance. Erfle et al. [10] analysed used vanadium based catalysts
by FTIR spectroscopy and concluded that coke forms on Brønsted
sites. This conclusion was confirmed by Suprun et al. [11] who eval-
uated carbon deposits on phosphate catalysts. They also observed
that higher reaction temperatures and small pore diameter of the
catalyst lead to further carbon formation. Pethan Rajan et al. [12]
characterized spent VPO by TPD-NH3 and FTIR-pyridine. The results
showed that the acidity and Brønsted acidic sites of the catalyst
decreased after 40 h time-on-stream. Consequently, the conversion
and selectivity of the catalyst decreased. The selectivity of acrolein
over coked WO3/TiO2 catalysts is higher than on fresh catalyst and
it remains active even after 6 h reaction time [13]. As a first step,
we evaluated the performance of the coked catalyst and observed
that partial regeneration of the catalyst improved the selectivity of
acrolein and less coke formed in the early stages of reaction.
Although gas-phase dehydration of glycerol to acrolein has been
studied since 1930 [8], most of the focus in this area is dedicated
to fixed-bed reactors. Fixed-bed reactors are associated with some
major drawbacks such as poor heat and mass transfer and hot spot
formation in case of exothermic reactions. Considering the rapid
deactivation of acid catalysts, catalyst regeneration is necessary in
dehydration of glycerol. A fluidized bed reactor is the most suit-
able choice for this case as it provides a homogeneous heat and
mass transfer and avoids local accumulation of the coke in catalytic
bed.
A TA-Q50 thermogravimetric analyzer measured the weight loss
as a function of temperature. A Platinel II thermocouple placed
2 mm above the sample pan monitored the temperature. For each
run, we loaded 20 mg of sample to a 10 m aluminium crucible. The
resolution and accuracy of the balance were 0.1 g and > 0.1%.
A Philipps Xpert diffractometer scanned samples at room tem-
perature (Cu anode, K = 0.15406 nm recorded the patterns at 50 kV
voltage and 40 mA current) and produced the diffraction pattern
(XRD) from which we deduced the HPW/TiO2 crystal phases. The
diffraction angle (2 theta range) varied between 20◦ and 90◦ at a
0.020◦ step size.
A
JEOL JSM-7600TFE Field Emission Scanning Electron
Microscopy recorded the microscopic images of the prepared
catalysts. The samples were mounted on an aluminium sample
holder containing a double graphite adhesive layer. We used
both LEI (lower secondary electron image) and LABE (low-angle
backscattered electron) detectors.
The samples prepared for FESEM analysis were also analysed at
the same time for EDX imaging. An OXFORD (X-Max) instrument
recorded the EDX images for elemental analysis of the samples.
For Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) a Spotlight
400 – PerkinElmer FTIR spectrometer was used. Prior to the anal-
ysis, the catalyst samples were treated with pyridine as the probe
molecule. We recorded the background spectra of samples before
analysing any samples. Then we treated the samples with pyridine
at room temperature and desorbed the excess pyridine at 100 ◦C
for 1 h. After cooling to room temperature, the instrument recorded
the spectra. The IR range of the analysis was 600–4000 cm−1 with
resolution of 16 cm−1
.
Here, we tested three loadings of tungsten oxide over large
pore and narrow pore titania supports. We focused on the effect
of pore diameter on acrolein, by-products and coke selectivity.
As preserving some coke on the surface of WO3/TiO2 improved
acrolein selectivity in the first 15 min of reaction [13], we devel-
oped a novel method to treat our catalysts with hydrogen rich coke
promoters such as tetralin and decalin to passivate non-selective
sites of the catalyst and increase acrolein selectivity and to evidence
the hydrogen transfer reactions taking place in the early phases of
the reaction.
A heat flow calorimeter (Setaram C80) connected to a volumet-
ric apparatus measured the acidity and basicity of the catalyst at
150 ◦C. The instrument was equipped with a Barocel capacitance
manometer to monitor pressure. The probe molecules (ammo-
nia for acidity and sulphur dioxide for basicity) were purified by
successive freeze–pump–thaw cycles. First, 100 mg sample was
pre-treated overnight at 250 ◦C under vacuum. To record the dif-
ferential heats of adsorption, small doses of the adsorbate were
introduced onto the catalyst and the pressure reached 66 Pa. The
samples outgassed for 30 min at the same temperature, and the pro-
cedure was repeated at 150 ◦C and 27 Pa. The difference between
the amounts adsorbed in the first and second steps represents the
irreversibly adsorbed quantity (Virr) of a respective gas from which
we estimate the number of acidic/basic sites.
2. Methodology
2.1. Catalyst preparation
2.3. Experimental
We prepared catalysts with a mass fraction of 10, 20 and 30%
phosphotungstic acid (H3PW12O40 or HPW) on large pore and nar-
row pore titania supports provided by ARKEMA (Hombikat 11010
– HKT-1 and Hombikat 11060 – HKT-2). A LA-950 (Horiba) laser
diffractometer measured the particle size distribution (PSD) of the
pure titania. The mean particle size of the supports was 95 m and
106 m for the HKT-1 and the HKT-2 samples, respectively. The
HPW (Nippon Inorganic Color & Chemical Co., Ltd.) dissolved in
10 ml of distilled water in a rotavapor flask (BUCHI R-210). We sub-
sequently loaded 10 g of titania to the flask. The rotavapor mixed
the slurry for 2 h at room temperature. We applied a 60 mbar vac-
uum and heated the flask to 60 ◦C. The samples then dried for 10 h
at 120 ◦C and calcined for 3 h at 500 ◦C [14].
2.3.1. Catalytic reaction set-up
HPW/TiO2 catalysts dehydrated glycerol in a quartz fluidized-
bed reactor. The reactor height was 52 mm and its inner diameter
was 8 mm. A 20 m ceramic frit distributed the gas uniformly
across the reactor. Fluidized-beds are ideal reactors to regenerate
catalysts: the high solids mixing rate minimizes thermal and con-
centration gradients. In fixed bed reactors, coke may build up on
catalysts preferentially at the entrance of the reactor and in the cen-
tral region, which complicates interpreting reaction kinetics [15]. A
three-zone furnace heated the reactor and a thermocouple 100 mm
above the distributor monitored the bed temperature (Fig. 1).
A mixture of argon and oxygen fluidized the catalyst. To deter-
mine the minimum fluidization velocity (Umf), we recorded the
pressure drop at ascending and descending gas flow rates (Fig. 2a).
The Umf of all samples was 1.4 cm s−1. The total gas velocity was
held three times higher than this value for all the experiments.
The molecular oxygen (a mixture of 21 mol% O2/Ar) co-fed
with glycerol to maintain the catalyst life time and increase
acrolein selectivity while decreasing aromatic and hydrogenated
by-products [9,13].
2.2. Characterization techniques
An Autosorb-1 porosimeter (Quantachrome) measured the N2
adsorption/desorption isotherms at −196 ◦C. We assigned the sur-
face area based on the multi point BET (Brunauer, Emmett and
Teller) equation and the pore size and pore volume of the samples
on the BJH (Barrett–Joyner–Halenda) equation.