G Model
CATTOD-10238; No. of Pages7
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
C. Sepúlveda et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
Among the choices of heterogeneous catalysts for the selective
low activity towards breaking C C bonds, and it is highly efficient in
55 ◦C. Finally, the modified support (P (y)-SiO2) was dried for 12 h
at 120 ◦C and calcined at 550 ◦C for 4.5 h under static air [23].
The Cu/SiO2 and Cu/P(y)-SiO2 catalysts were prepared by
wet impregnation of aqueous copper (II) nitrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O,
Aldrich) to obtain a 20 wt% of Cu. The mixture was first homoge-
nized for 4 h at 55 ◦C in a rotary evaporator; then, the excess solvent
was removed under vacuum at 55 ◦C. Finally, the samples were
dried at 120 ◦C for 12 h and calcined at 500 ◦C for 2 h under static air.
Before the reaction, the catalysts were reduced ex-situ at 400 ◦C for
4 h in flowing H2 (60 mL min−1). The Cu and P contents were deter-
mined by atomic absorption spectroscopy using a Thermo Scientific
ICE 3000 model series.
C
O bonds hydrogenation and dehydrogenation. Copper catalysts
have been reported to be highly selective towards propanediols,
especially1.2-PDO [8,10,15]. Vila et al. [16] proposed that glycerol
conversion is favored by an optimal Cu0/Cu+ atomic ratio, while
the selectivity towards 1.2-PDO formation was attributed to the
principal presence of Cu0.
In relation to supports, acidic supports with diverse textu-
ral properties such as SiO2-Al2O3, zeolites, Al2O3, ZrO2, activated
carbons, etc. have been used to prepare Cu catalysts for the
hydrogenolysis of glycerol because of the critical functions of
tion [16–20]. However, SiO2 can also be an effective support
for glycerol hydrogenolysis: its activity and selectivity has been
reported to depend on the interplay between the impregnation
method and the high metal specific surface area of the active
component [8,21].
As previously mentioned, the acidity of the catalysts is fun-
damental in this type of reaction. Phosphorous has been used to
modify the acidic nature of catalysts to change the activity and
tion (HDS) reactions, the addition of P to NiMo/Al2O3 catalysts led to
an optimal combination of acidity and porosity which improved the
dispersion of the active phase on the support, enhancing the activ-
ity and stability of the catalysts [22]. Along the same line, Leiva
et al. [23] studied the effect of the addition of P on Mo/␥-Al2O3
conversion of guaiacol. The authors found that the addition of P
modified the activity which reached a maximum activity at 1.0 wt%
P. This change was correlated with MoS2 dispersion. Also, the prod-
ucts selectivity was modified, attributed to changes in acid strength
by P addition. Huang et. al [24]. compared the activity and selectiv-
ity of Ni2P/SiO2 and Ni/SiO2 catalysts in hydrogenolysis of glycerol
and found that P improves the catalytic activity attributed to syner-
gism of acid and metallic sites from P-OH and Ni, respectively. The
authors proposed that P addition favours C O bond cleavage over
2.2. Characterization of supports and catalysts
The BET specific surface area (SBET) and pore volume of the
supports and catalysts were determined from nitrogen sorption
measurements at −196 ◦C using Micromeritics TriStar II 3020
equipment. Prior to the measurements, the samples were degassed
at 300 ◦C for 2 h. Micropore volume (Vo) was determined by the
Dubinin–Radushkevich method while the total pore volume (Vp)
was recorded by nitrogen adsorption at a relative pressure of 0.99.
Mesopore volume (Vm) was determined by the difference between
Vp and Vo.
Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) was carried out in
a quartz cell in a system equipped with a thermal conductiv-
ity detector. In the experiment, 20 mg of the sample was heated
under 5% H2/Ar flowing at 50 mL min−1. The sample was heated at
10 ◦C min−1 from 25 ◦C to 1050 ◦C.
Powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD) were obtained using a D4
Endeavor Bruker AXS diffractometer equipped with a nickel-
filtered CuK␣1 radiation (= 1.5418 Å). The standard scan parame-
ters were 1◦ per min for the 2 range from 10 to 90◦. Identification
of the phases was achieved by reference to ICDD files.
The Diffuse Reflectance UV–vis measurements were carried out
using a Lambda 35 spectrophotometer. The Kubelka- Munk’s equa-
tion was used to calculate the intensities (IOH/IOHd) ratio between
Cu2+ octahedral species (IOH) and octahedral distorted Cu2+ species
C
C bond scission observed with Ni/SiO2 catalyst, and attributed
The total acidity of the support and the reduced catalysts
were measured potentiometrically by suspending the catalysts in
acetonitrile and titrating with n-butylamine using an Ag/AgCl elec-
trode [25].
this behaviour principally to geometric and electronic properties.
On the other hand, the effect of phosphorus on Cu catalysts sup-
ported on SiO2 has not been studied. Therefore, the objective of this
work was to study the P effect on the activity and products distribu-
tion of Cu/P(y)-SiO2 catalysts in glycerol conversion. The catalysts
were characterized by different techniques in order to correlate
their activities with the structure of the solids.
The XPS measurements were performed using a VG Escalab
200 R electron spectrometer equipped with a hemispherical elec-
tron analyzer and Mg K␣ (1253.6 eV) X-ray source. The samples
were reduced in-situ at 673 K under H2 flowing and transferred
from the pretreatment chamber to the spectrometer. The inten-
sity of the peaks was estimated by calculating the integral of each
peak after subtracting an S-shaped background and fitting the
experimental curve to a combination of Gaussian/Lorentzian lines.
Atomic ratios were calculated by using peak areas normalized on
the basis of acquisition parameters, sensitivity and transmission
factors provided by the manufacturer, and determined from the
corresponding peak intensities, corrected with tabulated sensitiv-
ity factors, with a precision of 7%.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation
The Cu/SiO2 and Cu/P(y)-SiO2 catalysts were prepared by suc-
cessive impregnation steps. Prior to the metal impregnation, the
SiO2 (Grace 432, Davidson) support was ground and sieved to
obtain particle sizes between 80 and 125 m. Then, the support
catalysts with three P loadings (2, 3 and 4 wt.% calculated on P2O5
basis). The range of phosphorous loading was selected according
to previous research, because P loading above 2 wt% increases the
acid strength of the catalysts [23]. Phosphoric acid (85 m/v%) was
also added to SiO2 in addition to 10 mL of deionized water. The pH
was adjusted between 1.5 and 2.0 with HNO3 (65 m/v%). Then, the
mixture was homogenized in a rotary evaporator for 3 h at room
temperature. The excess solvent was removed under vacuum at
2.3. Catalytic reaction test
Hydrogenolysis of glycerol was performed in a 300 mL batch
reactor 4848 Parr model. The concentration of glycerol used was
10 mol L−1. This concentration was selected after rigorous study
of the optimal glycerol amount to avoid the high vapor pressure
of water and the burning of glycerol. Also, the mass of the cata-
lyst used was selected from experimental study of mass of solid
necessary to keep the reaction in kinetic regime. In this context,
Please cite this article in press as: C. Sepúlveda, et al., Effect of phosphorus on the activity of Cu/SiO2 catalysts in the hydrogenolysis of