X. Zhu et al.
Journal of Solid State Chemistry 279 (2019) 120922
Fig. 5. XPS profiles of Au 4f region of Au/Li3PO4-13.
Fig. 7. (a) Surface structure of the Li3PO4 (001) surface, (b) Top view. The red
balls represent oxygen atoms, green balls represent lithium atoms, orange balls
represent phosphorus atoms. (For interpretation of the references to colour in
this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
strong acid sites, and the amount of weakly acidic sites increases slightly
with the decrease of pH, so the main reason for the change in perfor-
mance is the change of the basic sites.
3.2.3. Result of XPS
XPS measurement is used to analyze the chemical state of elements so
as to discuss the shifts of electron binding energy over Au/Li3PO4. Fig. 5
shows the XPS spectra of the Au 4f regions for Au/Li3PO4-13. There are
two broad peaks at 86.0 and 82.3 eV (corresponding to the 4f7/2 and 4f5/2
peaks) for the Au element, which is consistent with the Au0 oxidation
state [23]. The difference between these two peaks for gold (3.7 eV) is
exactly the same as that of bulk Au0 [24–26]. However, the peak posi-
tions are slightly different from that of bulk Au0. The Au 4f5/2 peak of
Au/Li3PO4 is seen to shifts to lower binding energies by 1.7 eV than that
of bulk Au0, which is reported to be at 84.0 eV [27,28] This indicates that
Au species is negatively charged after gold was deposited on Li3PO4.
Fig. 6 shows the XPS spectra of the O1s regions of Au/Li3PO4-13 and
Li3PO4-13. It can be seen that the binding energy of the O1s spectra of
Au/Li3PO4-13 relative to the O of Li3PO4-13 was increased by 0.5 eV.
This indicates that the O species loses electrons after gold is deposited on
Li3PO4. The cause of electron density changes of the O and Au should be
further discussed.
Fig. S9 shows the XPS spectrum of the Li 1s (a) and P 2p (b) regions of
Au/Li3PO4-x and Li3PO4-x. It can be seen that there is no change in the
binding energy of Li and P of these catalysts. Fig. S10 is the XPS data for
different Au loaded samples. It can be seen that the binding energy of Au
of the samples with different Au loadings is reduced. However, it is worth
noting that the binding energy of the sample with the highest Au loading
is reduced by 1.5 eV, which is lower than the reduced binding energy of
the sample with an Au loading of 0.042 wt%.
The Au 4f binding energy for supported catalysts compared with that
in bulk Au has been investigated in a number of literatures [29–31].
Yejun Park et al. [32] proposed that in the Au/AlPO4 nanocomposite, the
shift of the Au 4f peaks occurs toward lower binding energies, indicating
the presence of a negative charge on gold nanoparticles due to the
electron transfer from AlPO4. Caixia Qi et al. [33] have reported that the
majority of the gold tends to be zero valence metal, but there is a small
shift toward lower binding energy for three P-containing samples,
implying the transfer of electrons to Au and the formation of Auδꢁ atoms.
However, the decrease in the Au 4f binding energy for Au/Li3PO4 has not
been studied yet. In Fig. 5, Au 4f shifts to lower binding energy. In Fig. 6,
O 1s shifts to a higher binding energy. It can be inferred that the decrease
of the Au 4f binding energy may come from the charge transfer from the
surface of Li3PO4. The interaction between gold and Li3PO4 results in a
local perturbation of the electronic structure and a shift in the density of
Fig. 6. XPS profiles of O 1s region of Au/Li3PO4-13.
3.2.2. Result of CO2-TPD and NH3-TPD
The profiles of Au/Li3PO4-13 and Li3PO4-x are shown in Fig. 4. There
are two CO2 desorption peaks in the profiles. For the Li3PO4-13, the first
peak with Tmax ¼ 139 ꢀC represents the weak base site and the second
peak with Tmax ¼ 326 ꢀC corresponds to the strong base site. However,
for Au/Li3PO4-13, the peaks of weak and strong base sites are at 134 ꢀC
and 382 ꢀC, respectively. In other words, weak base strength is not
changed, but strong base strength is enhanced after gold deposition.
Considering the pK values of H3PO4 (2.1,7.2,12.3), the prevalent ions in
the solution changes with the decrease of pH values. For Li3PO4-11 and
Li3PO4-9, as the monohydrogen and dihydrogen phosphate ions increase,
both weak and strong base strength are weakened. In order to quanti-
tatively compare the amount of base site, the peak area of Au/Li3PO4-13
and Li3PO4-x were integrated, respectively, as shown in Table S4. For Au/
Li3PO4-13, the amount of weak base sites decreases, but the amount of
strong base sites increases. Because strong base sites are favorable to
improve the activity of basic catalysts [22], it can be concluded that the
enhancement of catalytic activity comes from the improvement of the
strength and amount of basic sites after gold deposition. As for the reason
of this enhancement, we consider that gold species act as stronger base
site and make it improve. XPS was employed to get further information.
Fig. S7 shows the CO2-TPD curves of two Au/Li3PO4 catalysts with
different calcination temperatures. It can be seen that the strong basic site
of Au/Li3PO4 with higher calcination temperature is stronger, and the
strong basic site is advantageous for catalyzing the rearrangement of
propylene oxide, so the performance of Au/Li3PO4-300 is better.
Fig. S8 shows the NH3-TPD curves for Li3PO4 catalysts of different pH
values. It can be seen that there is no great difference in the amount of
4