ChemComm
Communication
in the pure methanol stream. Based on Ono’s research,9 the silica using ethanol as solvent could avoid the silica erosion effect caused
can react with dimethyl carbonate, which could be thought as the by methanol, and the higher content of well dispersed copper
methoxy group source, to synthesize TMOS via gas-phase reaction particles could be afforded compared with the catalyst spent in the
over the alkali hydroxide supported catalyst. Thus, in the vapor- DMO–MeOH stream even after 300 h of time on stream.
phase hydrogenation of DMO, the methoxy group derived from
Although the solvent feedstock effect on the hydrogenation of
the DMO molecule, which contains double ester groups, could DMO has been carefully studied by Lin and co workers,6 their
also be thought as the methoxyl group donor and help the research mainly focussed on the aggregation of the copper
formation of TMOS. Particularly, in the methanol solvent, the particles caused by the CO splitting and the oxidation of alcohols
transesterification effect between DMO and methanol may on the copper surface. Based on the present study, the variation
enhance the concentration of CH3OÀ and leads to a higher TMOS of the support under the methanol steam, which further leads to
formation rate.10 Also, the reaction between SiO2 and methanol to a decrease in the specific surface area and copper surface area,
generate TMOS under both supercritical and gas-phase conditions undoubtedly has significant influence on the deactivation of the
was evidenced by Chibiryaev et al.11 However, in the case of the Cu/SiO2 in the DMO–MeOH stream. The loss of the silica in the
DMO–EtOH stream, neither TMOS nor tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) form of TMOS evidenced by the GC-MS could be considered as a
was detected in the DMO–EtOH stream product mixture. crucial factor for the copper aggregation.
Although methanol is a product of DMO hydrogenation and the
In summary, the poor catalytic performance of the Cu/SiO2
formation of TMOS seems to be possible, the concentration of catalyst in hydrogenation of DMO with methanol as solvent is
CH3OÀ seems to be limited and both the generation amount and disclosed. The Cu/SiO2 catalyst is more stable in the DMO–EtOH
the rate of TMOS seem to be negligible. Chibiryaev et al. also stream than in the DMO–MeOH one. The loss of the silica from the
confirmed the impossibility of formation of TEOS from silica and Cu/SiO2 in the form of TMOS plays an important role in the decrease
ethanol.11 In addition, it can be roughly estimated that the in copper surface area and the aggregation of copper particle size,
synthesis of TEOS via silica and ethanol requires more energy which will lead to poor stability. As far as we know, this is the first
compared with the synthesis of TMOS via silica and methanol by report to study the solvent effect on the Cu/SiO2 catalyst. Our study
the bond enthalpy calculations.12 Meanwhile, a study on the illustrates the deactivation mechanism of the Cu/SiO2 catalyst and
thermal decomposition of TMOS and TEOS by Lin et al.13 shows the erosion of the silica support, thus has extremely important
that TMOS is 2400 times more stable than TEOS at 800 K. Thus, practical significance in its large-scale industrial application.
TMOS is more favourably generated under the hydrogenation of
DMO, and the Cu/SiO2 catalyst is more stable in the DMO–EtOH (Grant No. 2012CB224804), NNSFC (Project 21173052, 20973042),
stream than in the DMO–MeOH one. and the Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Munici-
We thank the Major State Basic Resource Development Program
The physicochemical properties of the catalysts are shown in pality (08DZ2270500) for financial support.
Table S1 (ESI†). An obvious increase in the Cu loading could be
Notes and references
observed in the catalyst after reaction in the DMO–MeOH stream,
confirming again the loss of silica species during the reaction
process. The decrease in the specific surface area and copper
dispersion could be observed from the spent Cu/SiO2 catalyst. It is
interesting to find that the catalyst spent in the DMO–EtOH
stream shows a lower decreasing value than that in the DMO–
MeOH stream. The variation of the supports usually causes the
changes in the specific surface area, which could further induce
copper aggregation and result in the small copper surface area,
the latter is considered as the crucial factor for the poor activity in
the hydrogenation of DMO.14 The increased copper particle size
(7.2 nm) after 300 h reaction in the DMO–MeOH stream as well as
the catalytic activity loss should be ascribed to the erosion of the
SiO2 support in the form of TMOS. To further study the influence
of the variation of the supports on the reduction behaviour of the
Cu/SiO2 catalyst, the TPR measurement was conducted and the
1 H. Yue, Y. Zhao, X. Ma and J. Gong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 4218.
2 X. Gao, Y. Zhao, S. Wang, Y. Yin, B. Wang and X. Ma, Chem. Eng. Sci.,
2012, 66, 3513.
3 (a) L. F. Chen, P. J. Guo, M. H. Qiao, S. R. Yan, H. X. Li, W. Shen,
H. L. Xu and K. N. Fan, J. Catal., 2008, 257, 172; (b) C. Wen, Y. Cui,
A. Yin, W. Dai and K. Fan, ChemCatChem, 2013, 1, 138; (c) A. Yin,
X. Guo, W. Dai and K. Fan, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 11003;
(d) L. Zhao, Y. Zhao, S. Wang, H. Yue, B. Wang, J. Lv and X. Ma, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51, 13935.
4 Z. He, H. Lin, P. He and Y. Yuan, J. Catal., 2011, 277, 54.
5 H. Yue, Y. Zhao, L. Zhao, J. Lv, S. Wang, J. Gong and X. Ma, AlChE,
2012, 58, 2798.
6 J. Lin, X. Zhao, Y. Cui, H. Zhang and D. Liao, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 1177.
7 S. M. Lee, S. H. Park, S. C Lee and H. J. Kim, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2006,
432, 518–522.
8 Y. Zhang and J. Huang, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 7161.
9 (a) E. Suzuki, M. Akiyama and Y. Ono, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1992, 2, 136; (b) Y. Ono, M. Akiyama and E. Suzuki, Chem. Mater.,
1993, 5, 442.
results are shown in Fig. S6 (ESI†). The fresh Cu/SiO2 catalyst 10 N. W. Cant, S. P. Tonner, D. L. Trimm and M. S. Wainwright,
J. Catal., 1985, 91, 197–207.
11 A. M. Chibiryaev, I. V. Kozhevnikov and O. N. Martyanov, Appl.
shows only one peak at 525 K assigned to the well-dispersed
copper oxide,3a which is consistent with the XRD results. The
Catal., A, 2013, 456, 159–167.
Cu/SiO2 catalyst spent in the DMO–MeOH stream also shows a 12 (a) S. J. Blanksby and G. B. Ellison, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 255;
(b) B. S. Jursic, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1999, 369;
single reduction peak, but the reduction peak shifts to a higher
(c) S. Venimadhavan, K. Amarnath, N. G. Harvey, J. P. Cheng and
temperature of ca. 575 K, indicating that the crystalline copper
E. M. Arnett, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 221.
species with large particle size are dominant.3a For the Cu/SiO2 13 (a) J. C. S. Chu, J. Breslin, N. S. Wang and M. C. Lin, Mater. Lett.,
1991, 12, 179; (b) J. C. S. Chu, R. Soller, M. C. Lin and C. F. Melius,
J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 663.
14 S. Zhao, H. Yue, Y. Zhao, B. Wang, Y. Geng, J. Lv, S. Wang, J. Gong
catalyst spent in the DMO–EtOH stream, there are two distinct
peaks which are assigned to the well-dispersed and crystalline
copper species respectively. These results strongly suggest that
and X. Ma, J. Catal., 2013, 297, 142.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 5195--5197 5197