452
Y. Zhang et al. / Journal of Catalysis 251 (2007) 443–452
formation on the latter two catalysts increased with increasing
CO partial pressure, in a manner similar to that observed for
Cu-Y. Likewise, the rate of DMC formation was not very sensi-
tive to the partial pressure of O2. Increasing the partial pressure
of O2 led to an increase in the rate of DMM formation on Cu-
ZSM-5 and Cu-MOR.
with in situ IR observations, suggest that the rate-limiting step
for the formation of DMC is likely to be the insertion of CO
into a Cu–OCH3 bond. The observed loss in DMC yield with
increasing methanol conversion is attributed to the hydrolysis
of DMC to methanol and carbon dioxide, a thermodynamically
favorable reaction.
As noted earlier, both IR spectroscopy and XANES spectra
obtained in situ demonstrate that the concentration of surface
methoxide species was much lower on Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-
MOR than on Cu-Y and that most of the Cu+ cations were
occupied by adsorbed methanol and CO. The strongly adsorbed
CO appeared to inhibit the formation of methoxide species and
thus the formation of DMC. Therefore, reactions (4) and (6) ap-
peared to be strongly suppressed on Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-MOR.
DMM was formed on all three catalysts. The rates of forma-
tion of this product were comparable on Cu-Y and Cu-MOR
and notably higher on Cu-ZSM-5. The participation of O2 in
the formation of this product was essential, because the overall
stoichiometry of DMM formation was 3CH3OH + (1/2)O2 →
(CH3O)2CH2 + 2H2O. Consistent with this, as shown in
Figs. 10–12, the rate of DMM formation increased with in-
creasing partial pressures of both CH3OH and O2. Because the
rate of DMM formation did not appear to correlate with the
formation of methoxide species, DMM may have formed via a
concerted reaction involving CH3OH and O2; however, the re-
sults of the present study are insufficient to provide a basis for
suggesting what this mechanism might be.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the synchrotron laboratories of SSRL and
ALS for the allocated beam time and assistance. This work
was supported by the Methane Conversion Cooperative (MC2)
funded by BP.
References
[1] M.A. Pacheco, C.L. Marshall, Energy Fuels 11 (1997) 2–29.
[2] Y. Ono, Pure Appl. Chem. 68 (1996) 367–375.
[3] Y. Ono, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 155 (1997) 133–166.
[4] S.T. King, J. Catal. 161 (1996) 530–538.
[5] S.T. King, Catal. Today 33 (1997) 173–182.
[6] S.A. Anderson, T.W. Root, J. Catal. 217 (2003) 396–405.
[7] S.A. Anderson, T.W. Root, J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 220 (2004) 247–255.
[8] I.J. Drake, Y.H. Zhang, D. Briggs, B. Lim, T. Chau, A.T. Bell, J. Phys.
Chem. B 110 (2006) 11654–11664.
[9] Y.H. Zhang, I.J. Drake, D.N. Briggs, A.T. Bell, J. Catal. 244 (2006) 219–
229.
[10] Y.H. Zhang, I.J. Drake, A.T. Bell, Chem. Mater. 18 (2006) 2347–2356.
[11] I.J. Drake, Y.H. Zhang, M.K. Gilles, C.N.T. Liu, P. Nachimuthu, R.C.C.
Perera, H. Wakita, A.T. Bell, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 11665–11676.
[12] M. Newville, J. Synch. Rad. 8 (2001) 322–324.
[13] B. Ravel, M. Newville, J. Synch. Rad. 12 (2005) 537–541.
[14] M. Vaarkamp, J.C. Linders, D.C. Koningsberger, Physica B 209 (1995)
159–160.
5. Conclusion
Our findings indicate that Cu in Cu-Y, Cu-ZSM-5, and Cu-
MOR prepared by solid-state exchange of H-Y, H-ZSM-5, and
H-MOR with CuCl is present exclusively as Cu+. The average
coordination number of the Cu+ is close to 2 for Cu-Y and be-
tween 2 and 3 for Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-MOR. Under identical
reaction conditions, the activity and selectivity of these cata-
lysts for the oxidative carbonylation of methanol is a function of
the zeolite structure and Si/Al ratio. Cu-Y exhibits the greatest
activity and selectivity. Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-MOR exhibit signif-
icantly lower DMC synthesis activity and higher selectivity for
DMM synthesis than Cu-Y. The superior activity and selectiv-
ity of Cu-Y for DMC synthesis are associated with its weaker
adsorption of CO. Under reaction conditions, CO adsorbed on
Cu-Y is gradually displaced by methoxide species attached to
the Cu+ cations. This process also occurs on Cu-ZSM-5 and
Cu-MOR but to a much lesser extent. The ability of methoxide
groups to displace adsorbed CO from the Cu+ cations of Cu-Y
is closely related to the weaker binding of CO. Theoretical cal-
culations suggest that the lower binding energy of CO to Cu+
cations in Cu-Y compared with that in Cu-ZSM-5 or Cu-MOR
is due to the lower Si/Al ratio of Cu-Y. The rate of DMC synthe-
sis was found to increase strongly with CO partial pressure and
weakly with O2 partial pressure, and to be virtually indepen-
dent of CH3OH partial pressure. These trends, in combination
[15] D.C. Koningsberger, B.L. Mojet, G.E. van Dorssen, D.E. Ramaker, Top.
Catal. 10 (2000) 143–155.
[16] Y.H. Zhang, M.L. Toebes, A. van der Eerden, W.E. O’Grady, K.P. de Jong,
D.C. Koningsberger, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 18509–18519.
[17] U. Eichler, M. Brandle, J. Sauer, J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 10035–
10050.
[18] M.W. Anderson, J. Klinowski, Zeolites 6 (1986) 455–466.
[19] A. Zecchina, S. Bordiga, G. Spoto, D. Scarano, G. Petrini, G. Leofanti, M.
Padovan, C.O. Arean, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 88 (1992) 2959–2969.
[20] C. Lamberti, S. Bordiga, A. Zecchina, M. Salvalaggio, F. Geobaldo, C.O.
Arean, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94 (1998) 1519–1525.
[21] C. Lamberti, S. Bordiga, M. Salvalaggio, G. Spoto, A. Zecchina,
F. Geobaldo, G. Vlaic, M. Bellatreccia, J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 344–
360.
[22] C. Lamberti, S. Bordiga, F. Bonino, C. Prestipino, G. Berlier, L. Capello,
F. D’Acapito, F.X.L.I. Xamena, A. Zecchina, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5
(2003) 4502–4509.
[23] X. Zheng, Y. Zhang, A.T. Bell, unpublished work.
[24] P. Kumashiro, Y. Kuroda, M. Nagao, J. Phys. Chem. B 103 (1999) 89–96.
[25] X. Zheng, Y. Zhang, A.T. Bell, J. Phys. Chem. C, submitted for publica-
tion.
[26] G.D. Borgard, S. Molvik, P. Balaraman, T.W. Root, J.A. Dumesic, Lang-
muir 11 (1995) 2065–2070.
[27] Y. Kuroda, Y. Yoshikawa, S. Emura, R. Kumashiro, M. Nagao, J. Phys.
Chem. B 103 (1999) 2155–2164.
[28] A. Gervasini, C. Picciau, A. Auroux, Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
35 (6) (2000) 457–469.