Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
200
G. Halasi et al. / Journal of Catalysis 294 (2012) 199–206
gas-mixing unit serving for the adjustment of the composition of
the gas or vapor mixtures to be photolyzed in situ. We used a
15 W germicide lamp (type GCL 307T5L/CELL, Lighttech Ltd.,
Hungary), which emits predominantly in the wavelength range of
250–440 nm, its maximum intensity is at 254 nm. For the visible
photocatalytic experiments another type of lamp was used (Light-
tech GCL 307T5L/GOLD) with 400–640 nm wavelength range and
two maximum intensities at 453 and 545 nm. The approximate
light intensities at the catalyst films are 3.9 mW/cm2 for the germi-
cide lamp and 2.1 mW/cm2 for the other lamp. Methanol (ꢂ9.0%,
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Two types of TiO2 were used: Hombikat, UV 100 (300 m2/g), and
Degussa, P 25 (50 m2/g). For the preparation of N-doped TiO2 we
applied the description of Beranek and Kisch [47], who reacted
TiO2 with urea and calcined the catalyst at different temperatures.
This sample is noted with ‘‘SK’’. N-modified TiO2 sample (named
‘‘SX’’) was also produced following the description of Xu et al.
[48]. Titanium tetrachloride was used as a precursor. After several
steps the NH3-treated TiO2 slurry was vacuum dried at 353 K for
12 h, followed by calcination at 723 K in flowing air for 3 h. Me-
tal-promoted TiO2 samples were prepared by impregnating pure
or doped TiO2 with the solution of metal compounds to yield a
nominal 2 wt% metal. The following salts of Pt metals were used:
H2PtCl6ꢀ6H2O, Pd(NO3)2, RhCl3ꢀ3H2O, H2IrCl6, and RuCl3ꢀ3H2O.
The suspension was dried at 373 K and annealed at 573 K for 1 h.
For IR studies the dried samples were pressed in self-supporting
wafers (30 ꢁ 10 mm ꢂ10 mg/cm2). For photocatalytic measure-
ments the sample (70–80 mg) was sprayed onto the outer side of
the inner tube from aqueous suspension. The surface of the catalyst
film was 168 cm2. The catalysts were oxidized at 573 K and re-
duced at 573 K in the IR cell or in the catalytic reactor for 1 h.
Methanol was the product of Scharlau with a purity of 99.98%.
2160 lmol) was introduced in the reactor through an externally
heated tube avoiding condensation. The carrier gas was Ar, which
was bubbled through methanol at room temperature. The gas-
mixture was circulated by a pump. The reaction products were
analyzed with a HP 5890 gas chromatograph equipped with
PORAPAK Q and PORAPAK S packed columns. The sampling loop
of the GC was 500
to this loop.
ll. The amounts of all products were related
3. Results
3.1. Characterization of the catalysts
In our previous paper we determined the bandgap energy of
several TiO2 + N catalysts [15] following the method described by
Beranek and Kisch [47]. In the present work this characteristic
was measured only for the new samples. The Kubelka–Munk func-
tion F(R1) vs. wavelength curves were obtained from diffuse reflec-
2.2. Methods
ꢃ Eg)n/h was used in the
For FTIR studies a mobile IR cell housed in a metal chamber was
used. The sample can be heated and cooled at 150 K. The IR cell can
be evacuated to 10ꢃ5 Torr using a turbo molecular pumping sys-
tem. The samples were illuminated by the full arc of a Hg lamp
(LPS-220, PTI) outside the IR sample compartment. The IR range
of the light was filtered by a quartz tube (10 cm length) filled with
triple distilled water applied at the exit of the lamp. The filtered
light passed through a high-purity CaF2 window into the cell. The
light of the lamp was focused onto the sample. The output pro-
duced by this setting was 300 mW cmꢃ2 at a focus of 35 cm. The
maximum photon energy at the sample is ca. 5.4 eV. After illumi-
nation, the IR cell was moved to its regular position in the IR beam.
Infrared spectra were recorded with a Biorad (Digilab. Div. FTS
155) instrument with wavenumber accuracy of 4 cmꢃ1. All the
spectra presented in this study are difference spectra.
tance data, and the equation
a
= A(h
m
m
calculation, where
a
is the absorption coefficient, A is a constant,
h is the energy of light and n is a constant depending on the nature
m
of the electron transition. Assuming an indirect bandgap (n = 2) for
TiO2, with
a
proportional to F(R ), the bandgap energy can be ob-
1
1/2
tained from the plots of [F(R1)h
m
]
vs. hm, as the intercept at
[F(R )h ]1/2 = 0 of the extrapolated linear part of the plot. The val-
1
m
ues obtained for pure and doped TiO2 are collected in Table 1. This
shows that depending on the preparation the incorporation of N
into TiO2 considerably lowers its bandgap. In contrast, no or only
slight decrease occurred by doping TiO2 with fluorine.
3.2. FTIR study of photolysis of methanol
The primary aim of the IR study is to ascertain the development
of adsorbed complexes on the effect of illumination on TiO2, and to
establish the influence of metal deposition on these features. As
observed before [41] prior to the addition of methanol the IR spec-
trum of TiO2 showed the usual mOH absorption at 3720, 3671, and
3648 cmꢃ1. The adsorption of methanol resulted in a very broad
absorption region between 3500 and 2700 cmꢃ1 due to the high
concentration of OH groups. In the C–H stretching region absorp-
tion bands of different intensities were traced at 2948, 2935–
2938, 2923, 2914, 2891, 2873, 2844, 2842, and ꢂ2810 cmꢃ1 (not
shown). In the low frequency range weak bands appeared at
1561, 1445, 1442, 1380, 1361, 1157, and ꢂ1080 cmꢃ1 (Fig. 1A).
Illumination of the CH3OH vapor–TiO2 system caused no observa-
ble change in the high frequency range, but led to the significant
intensification of the bands in the low frequency region (Fig. 1A).
We experienced similar changes on the IR spectra of metal/TiO2
samples (Fig. 1B and C). A new feature was the sudden appearance
of a strong band between 2000 and 2045 cmꢃ1 due to adsorbed CO,
which grew only slightly with the progress of illumination. This is
illustrated in Fig. 1D.
For the determination of bandgap of solids, diffuse reflectance
spectra of TiO2 samples were obtained using an UV/Vis spectro-
photometer (OCEAN OPTICS, Typ.USB 2000) equipped with a dif-
fuse reflectance accessory. The surface area of the catalysts was
determined by BET method with N2 adsorption at ꢂ100 K. The dis-
persion of metals was determined by the adsorption of H2 at room
temperature. Data are listed in Table 1.
Photocatalytic reaction was followed in the same way as de-
scribed in our previous paper [15]. The photoreactor (volume:
970 ml) consists of two concentric Pyrex glass tubes fitted one into
the other and a centrally positioned lamp. It is connected to a
Table 1
Some characteristic data for pure and doped TiO2.
Sample
Pretreatment
temperature (K)
Surface area
(m2/g)
Bandgap
(eV)
TiO2
(Hombikat)
As received
ꢂ300
3.17, 3.21
TiO2 + N (SK)
TiO2 + N (SK)
TiO2 + N (SK)
TiO2 (SX)
450
573
773
723
723
260
115
81
265
79
3.04
3.00
2.17
3.02
ꢂ1.96
When adsorbed methanol was irradiated the first change was
the instant appearance of the CO band at 2000–2045 cmꢃ1, which
became larger as a result of continuous illumination (not shown).
TiO2 + N (SX)