C–C BOND CLEAVAGE
153
3
Concentration, 10 M
ecule to coordinate vanadium(V) can influence both the
rate and selectivity of oxidation. This argument should
be taken into account to rationalize the surprising easi-
ness of C–C bond cleavage in the course of FAME oxi-
dation.
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
Our findings indicate that the oxidation of FAMEs
V
in the V /H O /AcOH system does not involve free
2
2
radical chain reactions. However, it is conceivable that
the C–C bond cleavage involves electron transfer from
hydrocarbon C atoms to the vanadium(V) complex.
Similar transformations were observed in the course of
II
III
Co /Co -catalyzed alkane oxidation by dioxygen in a
CF COOH solution [13, 14].
3
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time, min
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research, project nos. 99-03–33248 and 99–
3–32291, and by the Federal Program for Supporting
Leading Scientific Schools, project no. 00–15–97429.
Accumulation of (1) pentanone and (2) pentanol in the
course of oxidation of n-pentane in the V /H O /AcOH
0
V
2
2
V
–3
system at 30°C, [V ] = 4 × 10 M, [S]0 = 0.1 M, and
H O ] = 1 M.
[
2
2 0
REFERENCES
The oxidative splitting of C–H bonds at a tertiary or
quaternary carbon atom to produce either ketones or
secondary or tertiary alcohols, as well as analogous
reactions in the case of cyclohexane, can be schemati-
cally represented as two- or four-electron removal:
1
. Shilov, A.E. and Shul’pin, G.B., Aktivatsiya i katal-
iticheskie reaktsii uglevodorodov (Activation and Cata-
lytic Reactions of Hydrocarbons), Moscow: Nauka,
1995.
2. Sheldon, R.A. and Kochi, J.K., Metal-Catalyzed Oxida-
tions of Organic Compounds, New York: Academic,
1981, ch. 9.
3. Emanuel’, N.M., Denisov, E.T., and Maizus, Z.K., Tsep-
nye reaktsii okisleniya uglevodorodov v zhidkoi faze
(Chain Reactions of Liquid-Phase Oxidation of Hydro-
carbons), Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
. Makarov, A.P., Gekhman, A.E., Nekipelov, V.M., et al.,
Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 1985, no. 8,
pp. 1914–1917.
H
H
OH
H
–
2e
C
+ H O
C
+ 2H+,
(2)
3)
2
H
–
4e
C O + 4H+.
(
C
+ H O
2
H
4
A similar scheme can be suggested for C–C bond
splitting:
5
6
7
8
9
. Gekhman,A.E., Makarov,A.P., Nekipelov,V.M., et al., Izv.
Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 1985, no. 7, pp. 1686–1687.
. Moiseeva, N.I., Gekhman, A.E., and Moiseev, I.I.,
J. Mol. Catal. A, 1997, vol. 117, p. 39.
. Moiseev, I.I., Chemistry for the 21st Century, Oxford:
Blackwell, 1999, pp. 343–373.
. Moiseev, I.I., Shishkin, D.I., and Gekhman, A.E., New J.
Chem., 1989, vol. 13, no. 10/11, p. 683.
. Gekhman, A.E., Stolarov, I.P., Moiseeva, N.I., et al.,
Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1998, vol. 275-276, p. 453.
CH3
OH
H
–2e
+
+
C
+ H O
C
+ H + [CH ]. (4)
3
2
H
+
[
CH ] in reaction (4) symbolizes a cationic species
3
trapped by a solvent molecule in the transition state,
which further transforms to methyl acetate.
The methyl CH bonds in isooctane can be oxidized
to produce primary alcohols; however, their yield is
small. Five CH groups of the isooctane molecule con-
3
tain 15 CH bonds per two methylene bonds and one CH
bond at the tertiary C atom. Therefore, the low yield of
primary alcohols indicates that the activity of methyl
groups in this reaction is lower than the activities of
1
1
0. Gekhman, A.E., Moiseeva, N.I., and Moiseev, I.I., Dokl.
Akad. Nauk, 1996, vol. 349, no. 1, pp. 53–55 [Dokl.
Chem. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 349, nos. 1–3, pp. 165–167].
1. Emanuel’, N.M. and Knorre, D.G., Kurs khimicheskoi
kinetiki (Treatise of Chemical Kinetics), Moscow:
Vysshaya Shkola, 1974.
CH - and CH groups.
2
The electronegative CH OOC groups in FAME
3
molecules might be expected to suppress the reactivity
of the aliphatic chain in oxidation. However, the FAME
oxidation rates do not significantly differ from the oxi-
dation rates of cyclohexane and alkanes. Similar to
alkanes, the FAME molecule is oxidized to produce the
corresponding hydroxy and keto acids and their esters.
The propensity of the carboxy group of the FAME mol-
1
1
1
2. Barton, D.H.R., Bévière, S.D., Chavasiri, W., et al., Tet-
rahedron Lett., 1992, vol. 33, no. 38, p. 5473.
3. Vargaftik, M.N., Stolarov, I.P., and Moiseev, I.I.,
J. Chem., Soc. Chem. Commun., 1990, p. 1049.
4. Stolarov, I.P. and Vargaftik, M.N., Shishkin D.I., and
Moiseev I.I., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1991,
p. 938.
DOKLADY CHEMISTRY Vol. 378 Nos. 4–6 2001