Hydrogenation of Diketones on Platinum
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1. Hydrogenation of (Fluorinated) â-Diketones over
action. A major limitation of heterogeneous enantioselective
Pt/Al2O3 Modified by Me3N, Et3N, Quinuclidine, Quinoline,
45,46
catalysis is that truly in situ spectroscopic studies
supporting
(R,R)-PNEA, CD, and O-Methyl-CD
the mechanistic models are barely available due to technical
difficulties.
Hydrogenation of fluorinated â-diketones revealed that ad-
dition of the chiral amine or amino alcohol-type modifier not
only induced enantioselection but also enhanced the low
chemoselectivity to 99-100% in the hydrogenation of the
3
2,33,35
activated keto function.
Similar observations have been
reported for the hydrogenation of R,γ-diketoesters,47 and no
explanation for the excellent chemoselectivity has been found
yet. We assumed that chemo- and enantioselectivities in the
hydrogenation of fluorinated â-diketones are coupled phenom-
ena, and understanding how the modifier enhances the chemose-
lectivity can lead us to the mechanism of enantioselection. The
following mechanistic study based on catalytic experiments,
NMR and FTIR spectroscopic data, and high-level calculations,
indicates that the acid-base-type substrate-modifier interaction
is strongly affected by the adsorption on the metal surface.
9
3% ee in the hydrogenation of 1,1,1-trifluoro-acetylacetone
35
(1, Scheme 1) to the corresponding alcohol.
Experimental Section
Despite the impressive development in this field in the past
Materials. 1,1,1-Trifluoro-2,4-pentanedione 1 (Acros), acetylacetone
years, the mechanistic details at the base of the reaction are
still under debate. Several models have been developed, and
the conflicting opinions reflect the great scientific interest of
2
(Fluka), and 3-penten-2-one 4 (Alfa Aesar) were distilled before use.
Toluene (J. T. Baker) was dried and stored over activated molecular
sieves. Trimethylamine (Me N, Fluka), triethylamine (Et N, Fluka),
3
3
2
3,24,36,37
this topic.
There is some agreement on the formation
quinoline (Fluka), quinuclidine (Aldrich), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA,
Fluka), cinchonidine (CD, Fluka), and 1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoroacetyl-
acetone 3 (Acros) were used as received. O-Methyl-cinchonidine
of chiral sites on the metal surface upon adsorption of the
modifier, and also on 1:1 interactions between adsorbed modifier
48
3
8
(MeOCD) and (R,R)-pantoyl-naphthylethylamine ((R,R)-PNEA, Scheme
and substrate. However, contrasting hypotheses have been
formulated concerning the nature of substrate-modifier interac-
tions that lead to selectivity during hydrogenation of activated
ketones on Pt. Because the basic N atom of the modifier is in
most cases crucial for enantiodifferentiation (with only one
49
1
)
were synthesized by known procedures. The 5 wt % Pt/Al
E4759) catalyst was purchased from Engelhard.
Catalytic Hydrogenations. The hydrogenation reactions were
carried out in a mechanically stirred parallel pressure reactor system
Argonaut Technologies) or in a magnetically stirred stainless steel
autoclave controlled by computerized constant-volume constant-pressure
equipment (B u¨ chi BPC 9901). Optimally, the 5 wt % Pt/Al catalyst
was prereduced before use in a fixed-bed reactor by flushing with N
2 3
O
(
(
39
known exception ), interaction models have clustered around
the two main roles that can be played by this function: (i)
hydrogen-bond donor to the keto-carbonyl oxygen after proto-
2 3
O
2
nation,3
8,40
and (ii) nucleophile to the keto-carbonyl carbon as
at 400 °C for 30 min, followed by reductive treatment in H for 60
min at the same temperature. After being cooled to room temperature
in H (30 min), the catalyst was directly used for hydrogenation. The
2
metal dispersion was 0.32 and 0.20 before and after reductive heat
treatment, respectively, as calculated from the average particle size
determined by TEM.50 According to standard conditions, 42 mg of
catalyst, 1.84 mmol of substrate, 6.8 µmol of modifier, and 5 mL of
solvent were stirred (1000 rpm) at 10 bar and room temperature (23-
2
23,37,41
free amine.
Steric effects are generally considered crucial
for selectivity, after formation of one of the aforementioned
interactions. It has also been proposed that the ketone might
interact via hydrogen bonding with the adsorbed aromatic
4
2
anchoring group. In this proposal, the anchoring group would
then become a second docking site, but the relevance of such
interactions still has to be proven. On the other hand, catalytic
2
5 °C) for 2 h. Deviations from the standard conditions are specified
in the text.
Conversion and enantiomeric excess (ee) were determined by gas
and basic organic chemistry studies questioned recently the role
of quinuclidine as a nucleophile,4
3,44
whereas the 1:1 model
operating via hydrogen bond seems to become an increasingly
durable concept. With this background, any experimental
observation that can shed some light on the nature of the 1:1
interactions between the ketone substrate and the chiral amine
modifier is of great interest for rationalization of the catalyst
chromatography using a Chirasil-DEX CB column (Chrompack). The
products were identified via GC/MS (HP 5973 mass spectrometer) and
NMR. The enantiomers were verified by comparing the sign of their
51,52
optical rotation (Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter) with literature data.
In the hydrogenation of 1, (R,R)-PNEA, CD, and MeOCD always
afforded the (S)-enantiomer in excess, and in the hydrogenation of 2
the (R)-enantiomer formed in slight excess.
(
35) Diezi, S.; Hess, M.; Orglmeister, E.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. Catal. Lett.
2
005, 102, 121.
(
(
(
(
(
36) Baiker, A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1997, 115, 473.
(45) Bonalumi, N.; B u¨ rgi, T.; Baiker, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13342.
(46) Schneider, M. S.; Urakawa, A.; Grunwaldt, J.-D.; B u¨ rgi, T.; Baiker, A.
Chem. Commun. 2004, 744.
(47) Studer, M.; Burkhardt, S.; Indolese, A. F.; Blaser, H. H. Chem. Commun.
2000, 1327.
(48) Borszeky, K.; B u¨ rgi, T.; Zhaoui, Z.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. J. Catal. 1999,
187, 160.
(49) Orglmeister, E.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 78.
(50) Hess, R.; Krumeich, F.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. Catal. Lett. 2004, 92, 141.
(51) Forni, A.; Moretti, I.; Prati, F.; Torre, G. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11995.
(52) Besse, P.; Ciblat, S.; Canet, J. L.; Troin, Y.; Veschambre, H. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 2045.
37) Vayner, G.; Houk, K. N.; Sun, Y. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 199.
38) Schwalm, O.; Minder, B.; Weber, J.; Baiker, A. Catal. Lett. 1994, 23, 271.
39) Orglmeister, E.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. J. Catal. 2005, 233, 333.
40) Blaser, H. U.; Jalett, H. P.; Monti, D. M.; Baiker, A.; Wehrli, J. T. Stud.
Surf. Sci. Catal. 1991, 67, 147.
(
41) Augustine, R. L.; Tanielyan, S. K.; Doyle, L. K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1
993, 4, 1803.
(
42) Lavoie, S.; Lalibert e´ , M. A.; McBreen, P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
1
25, 15756.
(
43) Orglmeister, E.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. J. Catal. 2005, 234, 242.
44) Vargas, A.; Ferri, D.; Baiker, A. J. Catal. 2005, 236, 1.
(
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 128, NO. 12, 2006 4049