D. VandenBurg, G.J. Price / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 19 (2012) 5–8
7
when run under oxygen or air. Carbon dioxide is known to react
with lithium and its salts so much of the lithium present in our
system could have reacted with carbon dioxide deactivating it to
coupling [16,17].
Further experiments were carried out while varying the stoichi-
ometric equivalents of lithium. As shown in Fig. 3, using two
equivalents of lithium instead of one had little effect on the rate of
bromopentane consumption. When 0.75 equiv. was used, the
reaction was 63% complete and no further consumption of bromo-
pentane took place after 35 min; the corresponding values were
28% and 30 min, respectively when 0.5 equiv. was used. This indi-
cates that the availabilityof lithium is not rate limiting as long as suf-
ficient is available.
In order to determine whether the formation of a single product
was a feature of alkyl systems (in contrast to aromatics), coupling
reactions were conducted using 1- and 2-bromopentane, 1-bromo-
3-methylbutane, 2-bromo-2-methylbutane, 1-bromo-2,2-dimeth-
ylpropane. In each case, only a single product was formed resulting
from the coupling of both fragments at the position of the bromine
atom (Scheme 2).
The formation of a single product is in complete contrast to the
bromoaryls studied by Osborne et al. [7] and by Price and Clifton
[8] (Scheme 3) where mixtures of isomers were produced. How-
ever, in each case, the reactions proceeded via a radical intermedi-
ate. Aryl radicals are generally more stable and hence less reactive
than alkyl radicals and we postulate that the intermediates pro-
duced during coupling of aryl bromides are sufficiently long-lived
for rearrangement to take place. In contrast, in the more reactive
alkyl radicals, no rearrangement can take place prior to coupling
and so only a single product is seen.
Another significant difference between these systems was that
coupling of bromobenzene was found to follow second order kinet-
ics (rate constant, k = 0.01 dm3 mmolꢀ1 minꢀ1) while that of the
bromoalkanes was found to follow first order kinetics (k = 0.07
minꢀ1 and k = 0.04 minꢀ1 for the 1- and 2-isomers, respectively).
This adds further evidence to our suggestion of more reactive alkyl
radical intermediates, the argument being as follows. The generally
accepted mechanism [18] of the reaction initially involves an elec-
tron transferfrom the metalto producelithium bromide and an alkyl
radical followed by a second electron transfer to form an alkyl anion.
Scheme 2. Coupling of alkyl bromides. Only a single isomer is observed.
RꢀLiþ þ R-Br ! R-R þ LiþBrꢀ
k3
The overall kinetics of the process will therefore depend on the
relative rate constants for the steps. Where k2 is relatively faster
(i.e. the radical is short lived), k3 will be the rate limiting step
and the overall reaction will be second order; conversely, if k2 is
the slow step then the observed reaction order will be one (pseu-
do-first).
In a related experiment, a ‘‘cross coupling’’ between bromoben-
zene and bromopentane was attempted. Analysis of the NMR spec-
tra suggested cross reaction had occurred (aromatic proton to alkyl
proton coupling was seen in a COSY experiment to differentiate
from a mixture of pentane and benzene) but the recovered yield
of pentyl benzene was only approximately 10%, the majority prod-
ucts being those from the homocoupling.
Since mono-brominated aryl and alkyl compounds undergo effi-
cient Wurtz coupling, the possibility of forming polymeric materi-
als from dibrominated compounds (Scheme 4) was investigated
using 1,4-dibromobenzene, 1,4-dibromobutane and 1,6-
dibromohexane.
The coupling of 1,4-dibromobenzene led to a sticky brown ‘‘tof-
fee-like’’ material which was found by GPC to have an average rel-
ative molar mass of 716 corresponding to an oligomer with around
nine repeat units. NMR suggested that a short chain polyphenyl-
ene-like material had been formed although the coupling was
not exclusively at the 1,4-positions, as might be expected from
the results on monosubstituted aryls. Similarly 1,6-dibromohexane
and 1,4-dibromobutane coupled under the same conditions
yielded white solids which had molar masses of 516 and 464 mass
units, respectively. The 1H and 13C NMR of both samples were iden-
tical and consistent with the spectra of long chain alkanes or poly-
ethylene with no significant branching or alkyl groups due to
rearrangement.
Coupling of a series of 1,3- and 1,2-dibrominated alkanes shown
in Scheme 5 was attempted. Significantly, the 1,2-isomers did not
react even after prolonged sonication times whereas the 1,3-iso-
mers reacted but formed a complex mixture of products containing
linear and substituted oligomers. Only the isomers with terminal
substituents gave clean products.
R-Br þ Li ! RÅ þ LiþBrꢀ k1
RÅ þ Li ! RꢀLiþ
k2
The coupled product then arises from displacement of a bro-
mide ion from a second molecule of alkyl bromide, usually in a
SN2 reaction.
The short chain lengths of the oligomers produced by these
reactions was disappointing but may well be a consequence of
the rapidly decreasing solubility as the alkane chain length in-
creases. In order to counter the potential insolubility of long chain
polyalkanes in THF at 25 °C coupling of 1,6-dibromohexane in dec-
alin at 70 °C (polyethylene being soluble under these conditions)
was attempted. However no reaction occurred and only the start-
ing materials were recovered. It may be the solvent vapour pres-
sure was too high under these conditions to allow sufficient
cavitation to influence reaction at the metal surface. From the par-
allel with silicon-based materials [19,20], it may also be that a
stronger reducing agent such as sodium is needed, although
poly(organosilanes) are often more soluble than polyethylene
and so may form more easily.
The results can be rationalised by considering the mechanism
outlined above. The initial electron transfer step takes place at or
near to the metal surface. The metal surface would rapidly become
covered with a layer of lithium bromide, preventing access of
Fig. 3. Effect of lithium quantity on sonochemical Wurtz coupling of 1-
bromopentane.