Chemistry - A European Journal
10.1002/chem.201702614
FULL PAPER
Acetonitrile (3 mL, containing 1 equiv. water or 13.5 l/mL), NEt
equiv., 126 l) and phenylacetylene (2 equiv., 165 l) were successively
added. The tube was capped and the reaction was heated at 60C during
3
(1.2
Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical
Sciences (including P41GM103393) . The contents of this
publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not
necessarily represent the official views of NIGMS or NIH. We
acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for
provision of synchrotron radiation facilities in using beamline
BM01B.
20h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction vessel was cooled
down and the crude material was transferred to a Falcon tube. The tube
was subsequently centrifuged for 10 min (4000 rpm). The supernatant
liquid was removed and the catalyst was washed with acetone (2x2 mL)
then water (2 mL) and acetone again (2 mL). The washing procedure
was as follows; addition of acetone or water (2 mL) and centrifugation for
Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis • palladium nanoparticles •
10 min followed by removal of supernatant liquid. The washed and dried
benzofurans
Structure
• indoles • Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine
catalyst was reused for the next reaction and NMR yields were measured
between each cycle from the supernatant liquid.
[
1]
a) M. Lounasmaa, A. Tolvanen, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 175-191; b)
V. Sharma, P. Kumar, D. Pathak, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2010, 47, 491-
Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure parameters
5
02; c) M. Watanabe, W.-T. Su, Y. J. Chang, T.-H. Chao, Y.-S. Wen, T.
II
0
EXAFS measurements on solid Pd -AmP-MCF and Pd -AmP-MCF were
J. Chow, Chem. Asian J. 2013, 8, 60-64; d) H. Khanam,
-
II
performed at the Pd K X-ray absorption edge. Data on Pd -AmP-MCF
were collected at the wiggler beam line 4-1 at the Stanford Synchrotron
Radiation Lightsource (SSRL), Stanford, USA, operating at 3.0 GeV and
97-300 mA (top-up mode), and on Pd -Amp-MCF at beamline BM01B at
Shamsuzzaman, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 483-504; e) P. Han, X.
Gong, B. Lin, Z. Jia, S. Ye, Y. Sun, H. Yang, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 50098-
50104; f) G. W. Gribble, in Indole Ring Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd, 2016, pp. 1-38.
0
2
the ESRF, Grenoble, France. The EXAFS stations were equipped with
Si[220] double crystal monochromators. Higher order harmonics were
reduced by detuning the second monochromator crystal to reflect 60 % of
maximum intensity at the end of the scans. Internal energy calibration
was made with a palladium metal foil assigned to 24350 eV (Pd K
[2]
a) M. G. Kadieva, É. T. Oganesyan, Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. (N. Y.,
NY, U. S.) 1997, 33, 1245-1258; b) G. R. Humphrey, J. T. Kuethe,
Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2875-2911; c) A. A. Abu-Hashem, H. A. R.
Hussein, A. S. Aly, M. A. Gouda, Synth. Commun. 2014, 44, 2285-2312.
(d) For a recent metal free one-pot synthesis of benzofuranes see: R.
Ghosh, E. Stridfeldt, B. Olofsson, Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 8888-8892.
a) S. Cacchi, G. Fabrizi, Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, PR215-PR283; b) M.
Platon, R. Amardeil, L. Djakovitch, J.-C. Hierso, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012,
[
11]
edge).
[
3]
All measurements were performed in transmission mode. Four scans
were averaged for each sample after energy calibration by means of the
41, 3929-3968; c) X.-F. Wu, Y. Li, in Transition Metal-Catalyzed
[
12]
Benzofuran Synthesis, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 3-27.
EXAFSPAK program package. The data treatment, including pre-edge
subtraction, spline removal, normalization and Fourier transformation,
[
[
4]
5]
C. E. Castro, E. J. Gaughan, D. C. Owsley, J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31,
3
4
071-4078.
a) M. Pal, V. Subramanian, K. R. Yeleswarapu, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
4, 8221-8225; b) I. P. Beletskaya, A. N. Kashin, A. E. Litvinov, V. S.
was performed with the EXAFSPAK package. The experimental k -
weighted EXAFS oscillations were analyzed by non-linear least-squares
fits of the data to the EXAFS equation, refining the model parameters,
4
Tyurin, P. M. Valetsky, G. van Koten, Organometallics 2006, 25, 154-
158; c) L. Djakovitch, V. Dufaud, R. Zaidi, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348,
number of backscattering atoms (N), mean interatomic distances (R),
2
Debye-Waller factor coefficients (σ ), and threshold energy (E
o
). The
715-724; d) E. K. Yum, O.-K. Yang, J.-E. Kim, H. J. Park, Bull. Korean
theoretical phases and amplitudes used in the refinements were
[
13]
Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 2645-2649; e) C. Rossy, E. Fouquet, F.-X. Felpin,
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 1426-1431; f) P. K. Mandali, D. K.
Chand, Synthesis 2015, 47, 1661-1668; g) J. Kwon, J. Chung, S. Byun,
B. M. Kim, Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 470-476.
calculated using the FEFF7 program.
The standard deviations
3
reported for the refined parameters were obtained from k weighted least-
squares refinements of the EXAFS function (k), and without including
systematic errors. These statistical error values allow reasonable
comparisons, e.g. of the significance of comparing relative shifts in the
distances. However, the variations in the refined parameters, including
[
[
[
6]
7]
8]
a) Yin, J. Liebscher, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 133-173; b) M. Pagliaro, V.
Pandarus, R. Ciriminna, F. Béland, P. Demma Carà, ChemCatChem
2012, 4, 432-445; c) R. Schlögl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3465-
o
the shift in the E value (with k = 0), using different models and data
3520.
ranges, indicate that the accuracy of the distances given for an individual
complex is between ±0.005 and ±0.02 Å for well-defined interactions.
The “standard deviations” have been increased accordingly to include
estimated additional systematic errors.
a) J. M. Campelo, D. Luna, R. Luque, J. M. Marinas, A. A. Romero,
ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 18-45; b) K. Philippot, P. Serp, in
Nanomaterials in Catalysis, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,
2013, pp. 1-54.
a) M. Shakeri, C.-W. Tai, E. Göthelid, S. Oscarsson, J.-E. Bäckvall,
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 13269-13273; b) E. V. Johnston, O. Verho, M.
D. Kärkäs, M. Shakeri, C.-W. Tai, P. Palmgren, K. Eriksson, S.
Oscarsson, J.-E. Bäckvall, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 12202-12206. c)
For a previuos preparation of the silicious mesocellular foam (MCF)
material see: Y. Han, S. S. Lee, J. Y. Ying, Chem. Mater. 2006, 18,
643-649;
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Swedish Research Council (2016-
03897 and 349-2013-580 through the Röntgen Ångström
Cluster), the Berzelii Centre EXSELENT, the European
Research Council (ERC AdG 247014), and the Knut and Alice
Wallenberg Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. Use of the
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National
Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515. The SSRL Structural
Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE Office of
Biological and Environmental Research, and by the National
[9]
a) J. Malmgren, A. Nagendiran, C.-W. Tai, J.-E. Bäckvall, B. Olofsson,
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 13531-13535; b) K. P. J. Gustafson, R.
Lihammar, O. Verho, K. Engström J.-E. Bäckvall, J. Org. Chem.
2014,79, 3747- 3751; c) O. Verho, T. Åkermark, E. V. Johnston, K. P. J.
Gustafson, C.-W. Tai, H. Svengren, M. D. Kärkäs, J.-E. Bäckvall, B.
Åkermark, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 5909-5915; d) A. Nagendiran, H.
Sorensen, M. J. Johansson, C.-W. Tai, J.-E. Backvall, Green Chem.
2016, 18, 2632-2637.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.