CHEMSUSCHEM
COMMUNICATIONS
In the first stage of our work, the conversion of LA using
a H2-rich syngas with H2/CO ratio of 2, which is typical for
methanol or Fischer–Tropsch synthesis,[7a,e,f] was chosen as
a model to explore the feasibility of the proposed reaction.
We initially examined the reduction of a diluted aqueous LA
solution (0.45m) at 1208C in the presence of a series of zirco-
nia polymorphs supported gold catalysts having a similar aver-
age gold particle size (ca. 2 nm). When using Au/b-ZrO2, which
has been reported as a very active and selective catalyst for
FA-mediated LA conversion into GVL,[10] high conversion and
selectivity were obtained with an initial turnover frequency
(TOF) of 737 hÀ1 (see the Supporting Information) calculated
from the initial reaction rate, as the number of GVL molecules
formed per hour per gold atom. However, with the catalyst
comprising gold NPs deposited on single-phase monoclinic zir-
conia (Au/m-ZrO2), a much higher TOF (up to 958 hÀ1) can be
attained under identical reaction conditions. Importantly, the
aqueous LA can be quantitatively converted to GVL over Au/
m-ZrO2 within 4 h (Table 1, entry 2). This result is remarkable,
and becomes more relevant as the catalyst can be reused at
least five times, while maintaining a 98% conversion and
a yield up to 98% (Table 1, entry 3). Furthermore, it was con-
firmed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectral
(ICP-AES) analysis that there was no leaching of gold during
the reaction, verifying the inherent stability of the Au/m-ZrO2
catalyst.
syngas-mediated LA reduction was examined (Figure S5). The
reaction proceeded smoothly and was completed within 4 h.
During the whole reaction process, GVL was the only product
without detecting any other intermediates. Furthermore, in
a series of additional studies examining the effect of pressure,
it was revealed that the reaction time was greatly shortened
from 6 to 3 h as Psyngas was increased from 2 to 5 MPa (Table 1,
entries 2, 7–9). Subsequent experiments focused on the effect
of the reaction temperatures revealed that under otherwise
identical reaction conditions the Au/m-ZrO2 catalyst exhibited
rather low activity at 908C (Table 1, entry 5). Notably, at an ele-
vated temperature of 1508C, quantitative formation of GVL
can be attained within 2 h (Table 1, entry 6). It should be
stressed that, in this particular case the specific activity based
on LA conversion is up to 2.54 molgAuÀ1 hÀ1, which is over
three times more active than the previously established FA-
mediated Au/b-ZrO2 catalytic systems.[10]
At this juncture, it is important to note that gold deposited
on single-phase tetragonal ZrO2 (Au/t-ZrO2) can only afford
a very moderate GVL yield (Table 1, entry 4), in line with the
broad literature documenting the profound effect of poly-
morphic structure on the activity of ZrO2-based catalysts.[12]
The superior activity as found for Au/m-ZrO2 with respect to
Au/b-ZrO2 and Au/t-ZrO2 in this reaction could be due to
a higher CO adsorption capacity as well as a higher abundance
of hydroxyl groups of the Au/m-ZrO2 catalyst.[12b] The high effi-
ciency of Au/m-ZrO2 for the direct reduction of LA using a H2-
rich syngas relative to other supported gold catalysts was
shown clearly (Table 1). Au/TiO2 and Au/SiO2 resulted in poor
yields, whereas Au/C did not promote the reduction at all
(Table 1, entries 10–12). These results show that the combina-
tion of gold NPs with suitable polymorphs of ZrO2 is essential
for achieving a high catalytic activity for the selective reduction
of LA into GVL using syngas under mild conditions. Moreover,
we found that gold is uniquely active for LA reduction with
syngas compared with other noble metals. The attempts to
reduce LA to GVL with zirconia- or carbon-supported rutheni-
um, palladium, platinum, or rhodium NPs under the same reac-
tion conditions were unsuccessful (Table 1, entries 13–17).
These observations can be attributed to the intrinsically high
affinity of ruthenium, palladium, platinum, and rhodium for CO
adsorption,[13] which blocks their activity relative to gold.
To gain more detailed insight into the reaction performed
with Au/m-ZrO2, the time-course plot for the above mentioned
Table 1. Reductive transformation of aqueous LA into GVL with syngas in
the presence of various catalysts.[a]
Entry
Catalyst
T
[8C]
t
[h]
Psyngas
[MPa]
Conv.[b]
[%]
Sel.[b]
[%]
1
2
3[c]
4
5
6
7
8
Au/b-ZrO2
Au/m-ZrO2
Au/m-ZrO2
Au/t-ZrO2
Au/m-ZrO2
Au/m-ZrO2
Au/m-ZrO2
Au/m-ZrO2
Au/m-ZrO2
Au/TiO2
120
120
120
120
90
150
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
5
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
73
100
98
22
24
100
100
100
100
15
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
–
Given the fact that the composition of syngas can vary quite
significantly depending on the carbon source from which it is
produced,[7a,b] we have explored the possibility to produce GVL
via aqueous LA reduction using simulated syngas with varying
H2/CO feed ratio. To this end, three different volumetric com-
positions of syngas were examined in the Au/m-ZrO2-mediated
conversion of aqueous LA. As shown in entries 1–3 of Table 2,
in all cases, LA can be quantitatively converted into GVL, albeit
different reaction time is required. One interesting aspect that
deserves special mention is that the reaction involving the H2-
rich syngas proceeds much more rapidly than with the CO-rich
syngas. Of further interest is that inexpensive, renewable, and
easily accessible CO2-rich bio-syngas can also be successfully
applied to the LA reduction (Table 2, entry 6). These results are
extremely welcome in view of the fact that flexible and versa-
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Au/SiO2
Au/C
3
n.r.[d]
n.r.[d]
n.r.[d]
n.r.[d]
n.r.[d]
1
Pd/m-ZrO2
Pt/m-ZrO2
Ru/m-ZrO2
Rh/m-ZrO2
Pd/C
–
–
–
–
–
[a] Reaction conditions: LA (4.53 mmol), metal (0.1 mol%), simulated
syngas (H2/CO=2:1), water (10 mL). [b] The conversion and selectivity
were determined by means of GC using bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether as the
internal standard. [c] Results for the fifth run with a recycled cata-
lyst.[d] n.r.=no reaction.
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 42 – 46 43