J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3781
3781
Toluene Formation from Coadsorbed Methanethiol
and Benzenethiol on the Ni(111) Surface
†
,‡
Sean M. Kane, Deborah R. Huntley,* and
John L. Gland*,
†
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37381
ReceiVed NoVember 22, 1995
We report our observation of interspecies carbon-carbon
bond formation during the reaction of coadsorbed methanethiol
and benzenethiol on the Ni(111) surface. Toluene formation
has been detected between 250 and 320 K in addition to methane
and benzene, the hydrogenolysis products. Increased concentra-
tions of benzenethiolate and methanethiolate, the surface
intermediates, increase the amount of toluene formed. As
observed previously during methanethiol decomposition, a small
Figure 1. Thermal desorption spectra taken after methanethiol exposure
sufficient to produce a saturation coverage (0.25 ML) followed by an
equivalent exposure of benzenethiol on the Ni(111) surface.
1
amount of ethane was produced in addition to the cross-
Adsorbed thiols, such as benzenethiol or methanethiol, have
coupling product; however, no biphenyl was observed by
temperature-programmed desorption. On adsorption at 100 K,
dissociation of the sulfur-hydrogen bond in both thiols results
in the formation of a stoichiometric amount of the adsorbed
thiolate and adsorbed hydrogen. Addition of external hydrogen
decreases the amount of toluene produced up to 25% from the
untreated surface yield, despite the presence of hydrogen from
thiol dissociation. Oxygen pretreatment of the Ni surface results
in increased toluene production for a wide range of coadsorbed
thiolate coverages. Water formation below the toluene forma-
tion temperature decreases surface hydrogen, causing the toluene
yield to increase substantially compared to methane and benzene
yield. Toluene increases up to a factor of 20 were observed
for high coadsorbed coverages. Together these results clearly
indicate that competition between hydrogen addition and
alkylation controls toluene formation.
been characterized mainly for understanding carbon-sulfur bond
1
,18-22
23
activation,
lubrication, and the properties of self-
2
4
assembled monolayers. On most metal surfaces, the sulfur-
hydrogen bond dissociates on adsorption, leaving surface
hydrogen and the thiolate bound to the surface. Thermal
reaction of the thiolate typically leads to hydrogenolysis to form
the corresponding hydrocarbon or nonselective surface decom-
position. Carbon-carbon bond formation has not previously
been observed for two coadsorbed organothiols.
The equipment used in this experiment has been described
1
9
in detail previously. Products are studied by temperature-
programmed reaction, following adsorption on a clean or
predosed Ni surface. The crystal was heated at 5 K/s and
temperature-intensity profiles were collected for several masses.
Adsorbed thiol coverages were determined by measuring final
sulfur coverages with Auger electron spectroscopy after an-
nealing. No sulfur-containing species except the physisorbed
thiols desorb from the Ni surface in the temperature range under
observation, so final sulfur coverages accurately reflect initial
total thiolate coverages. The thiols were purified by several
freeze-pump-thaw cycles and applied through separate direc-
tional dosers, with the crystal positioned within 1 mm of each
doser. H and O were dosed by back-filling the chamber to a
Alkylation is typically performed in industry by the reaction
of alkanes and olefins in HF or H2SO4 reactors.2 Benzene
alkylation usually involves a Friedel-Crafts reaction of the
phenyl ring with alkyl halides over an AlCl3 catalyst.3 Studies
have also examined carbon-carbon bond formation with solid
acids,5 zeolites,7 molten salts,8 and transition metal com-
plexes.9 Carbon bond formation reactions have been studied
on several metal surfaces, including organohalide reactions on
,4
,6
,10
2
2
1
1-13
14,15
16
17
Cu,
Au,
and Pd and methyl radical reactions on Pt.
specified pressure for a set period of time.
†
‡
The coadsorption of a selected range of methanethiol and
benzenethiol exposures was examined. In addition to the
amounts of thiols dosed, the effect of dosing order was
investigated. Extensive data for each thiol separately have been
University of Michigan.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
(
1) Rufael, T. S.; Huntley, D. R.; Mullins, D. R.; Gland, J. L. J. Phys.
Chem. 1995, 99,11472-11480.
(
(
2) Albright, L. F. Oil Gas J. 1990, 79-92.
3) Emmet, P. H., Ed. Catalysis; Reinhold Publishing Co.: New York,
1
,19
reported previously for the Ni(111) surface.
The primary
1
955; Vol. 2.
products of the reactions of the individual thiols are hydrocar-
bons formed from hydrogenolysis of the sulfur-carbon bond.
Experiments have shown that adsorbed alone on a clean surface,
(
(
4) Alul, H. R. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. DeV. 1968, 1, 7-11.
5) Drago, R. S.; Petrosius, S. C.; Kaufman, P. B. J. Mol. Catal. 1994,
8
2
9
1
9, 317-328.
1
(
6) Guo, C.; Yao, S.; Cao, J.; Qian, Z. Appl. Catal. A 1994, 107, 229-
methanethiol produces methane at 273 K and benzenethiol
38.
19
forms a series of benzene desorption peaks above 265 K.
(
7) Reddy, K. S. N.; Rao, B. S.; Shiralkar, V. P. Appl. Catal. A 1993,
Figure 1 shows the reaction products observed following an
5, 53-63.
(
8) Chauvin, Y.; Hirschauer, A.; Olivier, H. J. Mol. Catal. 1994, 92,
55-165.
(17) Fairbrother, D. H.; Peng, X. D.; Viswanathan, R.; Stair, P. C.;
Trenary, M.; Fan, J. Surf. Sci. 1993, 285, L455-L460.
(18) Huntley, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 93, 6156-6164.
(19) Rufael, T. S.; Huntley, D. R.; Mullins, D. R.; Gland, J. L. J. Phys.
Chem. 1994, 98, 13022-13027.
(
9) Collman, J. P.; Hegedus, L. S. Principles and Applications of
Organotransition Metal Chemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley,
CA, 1980.
(
10) Carpentier, J. F.; Petit, F.; Mortreux, A.; Dufaud, V.; Basset, J. M.;
Thivolle-Cazat, J. J. Mol. Catal. 1993, 81, 1-15.
(20) Agron, P. A.; Carlson, T. A.; Dress, W. B.; Nyberg, G. L. J. Electron
Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1987, 42, 313-327.
(
(
(
(
(
11) Xi, M.; Bent, B. E. Surf. Sci. 1992, 278, 19-32.
12) Xi, M.; Bent, B. E. Langmuir 1994, 10, 505-509.
(21) Roberts, J. T.; Friend, C. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 7172-7180.
(22) Rufael, T. S.; Koestner, R. J.; Kollin, E. B.; Salmeron, M; Gland,
J. L. Surf. Sci. 1993, 297, 272-285.
13) Lin, J. L.; Bent, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6943-6950.
14) Paul, A.; Bent, B. E. J. Catal. 1994, 147, 264-271.
15) Yang, M. X.; Jo, S. K.; Paul, A.; Avila, L.; Bent, B. E.; Nishikida,
(23) Bolshakov, G. F. Sulfur Rep. 1986, 7, 109.
K. Surf. Sci. 1995, 325, 102-120.
(24) Troughten, E. B.; Bain, C. D.; Whitesides, G. W.; Nuzzo, R. G.,
Allara, D. L.; Porter, M. D. Langmuir 1988, 4, 89.
(16) Solymosi, F.; Kovacs, I. Surf. Sci. 1993, 296, 171-185.
0
002-7863/96/1518-3781$12.00/0 © 1996 American Chemical Society