G Model
CATTOD-9907; No. of Pages5
2
Z. Song et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
and environmental friendly [14]. If water could be widely used
as a solvent for organic reaction, it would bring about enormous
achievement in environmental, economic and safety aspects [15].
In previous works, we and other groups had developed many
to value-added chemicals in high-temperature water [16–18].
For example, we developed an efficient process for the selective
conversion of glucose to lactic acid under alkaline hydrothermal
conditions with the highest yield of 25% [19]. Recently, we reported
a method for the formation of ethylene glycol from glycolide over
CuO in water, and high yield of 94% was achieved [16]. Also we also
developed catalytic conversion of ethyl lactate to 1,2-propanediol
in the presence of CuO with the yield of 93% [20].
system, 5975 C inert MSD with Triple-Axis Detector) equipped
with an HP Innowax polyethylene glycol capillary column (30
m × 250 m × 0.5 m). The solid samples were analysed with X-
ray diffraction (Shimadzu, Lab-XRD-6100). The total organic carbon
concentration was confirmed by a TOC Analyzer (Shimadzu TOC-V).
The yield of cyclohexanol was calculated on the basis of the
following equation:
The mole of cyclohexanol obtained
The yield(%) =
The mole of cyclohexanone
3. Results and discussion
Based on the studies above, we herein present a highly
efficient hydrothermal conversion of biomass-derived cyclohex-
anone to cyclohexanol with high yield and high selectivity using
in situ-formed hydrogen in water in the presence of Cu catalyst.
A mechanism of cyclohexanone conversion was also proposed
(Eq. 1).
3.1. Catalyst screening
Initially, a series of experiments were carried out to investi-
gate the feasibility of converting cyclohexanone to cyclohexanol
in the presence of 5 mmol metal or metal oxides and 25 mmol
Zn with 25% water filling (7.5 mL H2O) at 250 ◦C for 150 min. The
in the presence of both Cu and Zn (entry 1). It is obvious that
the unique peak of desired cyclohexanol and 100.1 of its mass-to-
charge ratio (m/z) can be observed by GC-MS spectrum as shown
in Fig. 1(a). From Fig. 1(b), the peak of cyclohexanone is getting
smaller and smaller until disappearing completely while the peak of
cyclohexanol becomes bigger gradually as the time increased from
0 to 150 min, indicating that cyclohexanone was converted com-
pletely. Various Cu complexes, such as CuO, Cu2O, Cu2(OH)PO4 and
CuFe2O4, were investigated and gave desired products in moder-
ate to high yields, but the yields were not superior to that obtained
with Cu catalyst (entries 2–5). Co, Sn, Ni and NiO were also effective
for the conversion of cyclohexanone to afford good yields (entries
6–9). However, other metals or metal oxides, such as Fe, Fe2O3,
2. Experimental
2.1. Experimental materials
Cyclohexanone (≥ 99.5%) as the initial reactants was purchased
from J&K Scientific Ltd. Cyclohexanol (≥ 98.5%) was used for quan-
titative analysis. Zn (200 mesh, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.,
Ltd) was used as the reductant. Fe, Fe2O3, Fe3O4, Cu, CuO, Cu2O, Ni,
NiO, Co, SiO2, ZrO2, Al2O3, TiO2, Pd/C, active carbon (AR, 200mesh,
Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd) and Mn (AR, 200 mesh,
Aladdin) and Sn (AR, 200 mesh, Sigma–Aldrich) were also used in
the experiments. And two catalysts, Cu(OH)PO4 and CuFe2O4,were
prepared by ourselves according to the recent publication [21].
Table 1
Catalyst screening on the yield of cyclohexanol.a
2.2. Experimental procedure
All the experiments were performed in a Teflon-lined steel
batch reactor whose internal volume is 30 mL. Cyclohexanone
(0.193 mmol, 20 L) was used for all experiments in this study.
The procedure for the synthesis of cyclohexanol was as follows.
First of all, desired cyclohexanone, deionized water, reactant and
catalyst were loaded into reactor. Then, after filling in with nitro-
gen to remove air, the reactor was putted into a drying oven. After
a certain period of time, we took out the reactor from drying oven
immediately. Due to the oven setting, it would take 20 minutes to be
preheated to the desired temperature, so we prolonged 20 minutes
to reaction times. The reactor was cooled by an air fan. Finally, liquid
sample was collected and filtered by 0.45 m Syringe Filter. Solid
sample was collected and washed by deionized water for several
times and dried in drying oven at 60 ◦C for 24 h. The samples would
be analysed later. The schematic diagram of reactor and drying oven
was shown in Fig. SI-1.
.
Entry
Reductant
Catalyst
Cyclohexanol (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
–
Cu
Cu2O
CuO
Cu2(OH)PO4
CuFe2O4
Co
Sn
Ni
NiO
Fe
Fe2O3
Fe3O4
SiO2
ZrO2
Al2O3
TiO2
Pd/C
Mn
active carbon
–
92.2
71.2
70.5
47.4
57.6
86.7
64.0
70.8
75.4
18.2
15.4
5.3
7
8b
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
8.7
14.4
17.8
11.1
5.0
16.2
9.7
11.5
0
0
2.3. Product analysis
After the reaction, liquid samples were confirmed with GC-
MS (Agilent 7890A GC system, 5975 C inert MSD with Triple-Axis
Detector) equipped with an HP Innowax polyethylene glycol
capillary column (30 m × 250 m × 0.5 m). The qualification of
cyclohexanol was confirmed with GC-FID (Agilent 7890A GC
Cu
–
–
a
Reaction conditions: [cyclohexanone (0.193 mmol, 20 L), 25 mmol Zn, 5 mmol
catalyst, 25% water filling (7.5 mL H2O), 250 ◦C, 150 min].
b
Byproduct phenol of 17.0% was obtained with the conversion of 87.8%.
Please cite this article in press as: Z. Song, et al., Highly selective hydrothermal production of cyclohexanol from biomass-derived