4
02
Transition Met Chem (2013) 38:401–405
0
0
0
0
[
24], 4-Acetyl-3 ,4 ,5 -trifluoro-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4, entry
0 0 0
1
1) [15], 4-Acetyl-3 ,5 -difluoro-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4,
0
0
0
entry 12) [25], 4-Acetyl-3 ,5 -ditrifluoromethyl-1,1 -biphenyl
Table 4, entry 13) [26].
(
Results and discussion
To evaluate the efficiencies of the new catalysts for the
Suzuki reaction, initially we screened the reaction of a
relatively deactivated substrate, namely 4-bromotoluene,
with phenylboronic acid. We have investigated the proce-
dure with respect to five key variables in our catalyst
system: (1) solvent composition, (2) reaction temperature,
(3) effect of the base, (4) ligand composition and (5) cat-
alyst loading and ratio. During the course of these studies,
we discovered that the reaction can be run smoothly under
air when KOH or NaOH is used as base in ethanol (95 %),
thus improving its operational simplicity.
Scheme 1 The selected Schiff base ligands
tetrahydrofuran were dried by standard methods, and other
solvents were used directly. The Schiff bases L1 [20], L2
[
20], L3 [21] and L4 [22] were prepared as reported. NMR
spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz
spectrometer, and coupling constants (J values) are given
in Hertz.
GC–MS analyses for all of the experiments were car-
ried out on an Agilent 6890 GC with 5973 mass detector,
using an AT.SE-30 column of 50 m length, 0.32 mm
diameter and 0.5-lm-film thicknesses. GC parameters for
Suzuki reactions were as follows: injector temperature
Our first step was to identify the best solvent system,
since solvents have a key influence on the reaction envi-
ronment and affect the catalyst activity, especially in
transition metal catalyzed chemistry [27]. Casalnuovo and
Calabrese transferred this reaction to aqueous conditions as
early as 1990 [28]. Further, phase transfer catalysts and the
addition of water-soluble organic co-solvents have been
employed with great success in recent years [12, 15, 29].
The reactions were conducted in various solvents, with the
results given in Table 1. The ligands L1–4 were combined
2
80 °C; detector temperature 280 °C; initial temperature
00 °C; initial time 5 min; temperature ramp 1, 30 °C
1
-
1
-1
;
min ; final temperature 200 °C; ramp 2, 20 °C min
final temperature 250 °C; run time 30 min; inject 1.0 lL;
helium as the GC carrier gas; pressure of the system was
3
.5 bar.
General procedure for the Suzuki reaction
with Pd(OAc) in situ and used as catalysts for the Suzuki
2
reaction (Table 1). When the reaction was conducted in
ethanol with K CO as base and 0.5 mol % of catalyst, we
The appropriate amounts of ligand, base and metal pre-
cursor were added to the required solvent (3.0 mL). The
mixture was stirred for 30 min, and then, the aryl halide
2
3
were delighted to observe that the desired products were
isolated in nearly quantitative yields within 2 h with
(
0.5 mmol) and aryl boronic acid (0.75 mmol) were added,
Pd(OAc) /L1 as catalyst (Table 1, Entry 5). It is obvious
2
and the mixture was stirred under reflux in air. The course
of the reaction was monitored by GC–MS analysis, and
yields were calculated against the aryl halides. On com-
pletion of the reaction, the solvent was removed under
that temperature also constitutes a critical parameter for the
Suzuki reaction; L1 and L2 gave only poor yields at room
temperature (Table 1, Entries 1–4).
Among the various solvents explored, the best results
were obtained with EtOH (95 %), plus a small amount of
water to facilitate the reaction. Longer reaction times were
required with higher water contents, and trace biphenyl was
observed (Table 1, Entries 5–8). When neat water was used
as solvent, tri(p-tolyl)boroxine [30], phenol [31] and
biphenyl were observed as side products (Table 1, Entry
14). It was also observed that the phenolic and pyridine
groups of the ligand were crucial for achieving high cata-
lytic activities, and the use of supporting ligands with
relatively bulky substituents also increases the catalytic
activity.
reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with H O
2
(
3.0 mL) and Et O (3.0 mL), followed by extraction with
2
Et O (2 9 3.0 mL). The organic fraction was dried over
2
anhydrous MgSO4 then filtered, and the solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was
purified by column chromatography using 200–300 mesh
silica gel, and the purified products were characterized by
0
NMR spectra as 4-Methyl-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4, entries
0
1
, 2 and 8) [16], 4-Cyano-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4, entry 3)
0
[
23], 4-Methoxy-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4, entry 4) [24],
0
4
-Acetyl-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4, entry 5) [16], 2-Methyl-
0
1
,1 -biphenyl (Table 4, entry 6) [24], Biphenyl (Table 4,
0
However, under similar experimental conditions, L3 and
L4 were found to be less effective, producing only poor to
moderate yields (Table 1, Entries 5–14). Therefore, in the
entry 7) [15], 4-Trifluoromethyl-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4,
0
entry 9) [17], 2-Methoxy-1,1 -biphenyl (Table 4, entry 10)
1
23