Brandt et al.
SCHEME 1
compounds 5-7 in aqueous glycerol (this work, Table 1),
are shown in Figure 1.
The rate constant for 8 refers to the carbocation
formation measured in aqueous trifluoroethanol extrapo-
lated to water.16 A very similar value is expected for 25%
glycerol in water. Carbocation formation is not rate
limiting so the rate of product formation is smaller (Table
1). The equilibrium constant has been measured in
aqueous solution at 25 °C as [14]eq/[8]eq ) 22.17
Ca lcu la tion s. The thermodynamics of the reactions
depicted in Scheme 1, including the intermediate car-
bocations, was calculated using the Gaussian 98 pro-
gram18 and the B3LYP hybrid functional19 along with the
continuum solvation method AM1/SM220 in Spartan21
(see the Experimental Section for more details). The
results are given in Tables 2 and 3.
Discu ssion
The acid-catalyzed aromatization of naphthalene oxide
(5) has been the subject of several mechanistic stud-
ies.8,12,22 There seems to be a consensus that the ring-
opening is subject to specific acid catalysis and proceeds
through carbocation intermediates (Scheme 2). The reac-
tion, which is analogous to that of benzene oxide, involves
a rate-limiting cleavage of one of the carbon-oxygen
bonds to give a carbocation that rapidly loses a hydron
to give naphthol. This final aromatization step may be
preceded by a hydride shift (NIH shift). There is direct
evidence of the cation character of the transition state
of acid-catalyzed epoxide ring-opening reactions.8,22-24
There is also a noncatalyzed reaction path (eq 1), but that
is not the subject of the present study.
heat-flow microcalorimeter equipment. Therefore, 50 vol
% acetonitrile in water was used as solvent (Table 1).
The reaction yields 95% of 1-naphthol and 5% of 2-naph-
thol (Scheme 1). The kinetics of the reactions involves
an uncatalyzed path and a specific acid-catalyzed path
according to:
kobs ) k0 + kH[H+]
(1)
The carbon-oxygen bond cleavage of unsymmetrical
arene oxides, such as naphthalene oxide, yields generally
two isomeric cations. The product composition is expected
to reflect the relative stabilities of the R- and â-carboca-
tions. The ratio decreases by benzoannelation adjacent
(R) to the cation center from a kR/kâ ratio of 1.0 for the
symmetrical benzene oxide to kR/kâ ) 0.05 for naphtha-
lene oxide (Table 1), and 1,2-anthracene oxide shows an
even lower ratio.6a This effect has been rationalized by
less resonance stabilization owing to the benzoannelation
The measured second-order rate constant, based upon
the observed rate constants in 25 vol % glycerol in water
given in Table 1, is kH ) 70.4 M-1s-1 at 25 °C. The
uncatalyzed path has a rate constant of k0 ) 1.3 × 10-3
s-1
.
The cleavage reaction of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene oxide
(7) in 25 vol % glycerol in water gives a mixture of diols
with the trans 1,2-diol (11) as the main product (Scheme
1). The rate constants in aqueous solution at 25 °C and
30 °C and product composition of diols (94% trans and
6% cis) have been reported previously.13,14 The kinetics
is in accord with eq 1. To obtain the reaction heat for
the production of the mono-hydroxy substituted com-
pounds (Scheme 1), the calculated dehydration enthalpies
(-21.7 - (-18.5) ) -3.2 and -24.5 - (-18.5) ) -6.0
kcal mol-1, respectively, Table 1) were used to correct the
measured value.
The dehydration of 1-hydroxy-1,2-dihydronaphthalene
(6a ) has been studied in aqueous acetonitrile and in
aqueous glycerol (Table 1). The kinetics of the dehydra-
tion has been studied previously in aqueous solution.4
Table 1 also shows previously reported reaction heats for
the two other naphthalene hydrate isomers 6b and 6c.15
The second-order rate constants for the acid-catalyzed
reactions of compounds 1-4 and 8 in water,6 and of
(16) Boyd, D. R.; McMordie, R. A. S.; Sharma, N. D.; More O’Ferrall,
R. A.; Kelly, S. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7822.
(17) Dey, J .; O’Donoghue, A. C.; More O’Ferrall, R. A. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 8561.
(18) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J . A.,
J r.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J . C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J . M.;
Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J .;
Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo,
C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J .; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J . B.; Cioslowski, J .; Ortiz, J . V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J .; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; J ohnson, B. G.; Chen,
W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J . L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.;
Pople, J . A. Gaussian 98, Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(19) (a) Becke, A. D. J . Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Lee, C.; Yang,
W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
(20) Cramer, C. J .; Truhlar, D. G. Science 1992, 256, 213. Cramer,
C. J .; Truhlar, D. G. In Rev. Comput. Chem. Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd,
D. B., Eds.; VCH: New York, 1995; Vol. 6, pp 1-72.
(21) Spartan version 5.0.3, Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA 1997.
(22) (a) Kasperek, G. J .; Bruice, T. C. Yagi, H.; J erina, D. M. J .
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1972, 784. (b) Bruice P. Y.; Bruice, T. C.
J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2023. (c) Boyd, D. R.; Daly, J . W.; J erina,
D. M. Biochemistry 1972, 11, 1961.
(13) Becher, A. R.; J anusz, J . M.; Bruice, T. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1979, 101, 5679.
(14) Gillilan, R. E.; Pohl, T. M.; Whalen, D. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1982, 104, 4481.
(15) Pirinccioglu, N.; Thibblin, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6512.
7678 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 22, 2002