Organic Letters
Letter
a
primary alcohols are the major product from aryl epoxides and
secondary alcohols are the major product from alkyl epoxides.
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
2
0
Recently, homogeneous catalysis-enabled hydrogenation,
2
1
22
hydrosilylation, and hydroborylation of epoxides have
been reported for the selective formation of primary alcohols.
In contrast, Markovnikov selective secondary alcohols were
b
yield (%)
23
obtained by Ru-catalyzed hydrogenation and Mg-catalyzed
catalyst
1a:2a
(mmol)
time
(h)
2
4
hydroboration of terminal epoxides.
entry
(mol %)
solvent
3a 3′a
Recently, the superior catalytic activities of [IrCl(cod)-
1
2
3
4
Ir-1 (1)
Ir-1 (1)
Ir-1 (1)
Ir-1 (2)
Ir-1 (2)
Ir-1 (2)
Ir-1 (2)
Ir-1 (2)
Ir-1 (2)
Ir-2 (2)
Ir-3 (2)
Ir-2 (2)
−
PhMe
dioxane
1:0.5
1:0.5
1:0.5
1:0.5
1:0.5
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
16
16
16
29
49
57
88
18
17
60
72
71
98
86
97
−
−
4
−
5
(
NHC)] (cod = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) complexes for the
6d 6d,e
selective α-alkylation of ketones, secondary alcohols,
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
t-AmOH
2
5b
25a
nitriles, and β-alkylation of secondary alcohols by primary
alcohols have been reported by our group. With this in mind,
we decided to explore whether these NHC−Ir catalysts would
enable the one-pot selective ring opening of terminal epoxides,
leading to either ketones or secondary alcohols, and alkylation
by primary alcohols for the synthesis of α-alkylated ketones
through a BH methodology. We report an efficient NHC−Ir-
based catalytic system that enables selective ring opening and
alkylation of terminal epoxides with primary alcohols to the
corresponding ketones (Scheme 1d). This catalytic system uses
primary alcohols as both the hydrogen source and the
alkylating agent and liberates water as the only byproduct
under aerobic conditions.
c
5
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
d
6
e
1:0.5
1:0.5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0.75:0.5
0.6:0.5
0.6:0.5
0.6:0.5
0.6:0.5
0.6:0.5
0.6:0.5
f
14
Ir-2 (2)
Initially, the reaction of styrene oxide (1 mmol) with benzyl
alcohol (0.5 mmol) was selected as the benchmark experiment
to probe the potential of the previously prepared Ir-1 complex
as the catalyst, which is one of the most active NHC-based
catalysts for the transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl com-
2
6
1
pounds. The progress of the reaction was monitored by H
NMR spectroscopy, and the yields are based on 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard (Table 1). The
reaction was performed in the presence of the Ir-1 catalyst (1
mol %) and Cs CO (10 mol %) in different solvents (1 mL)
2
3
at 140 °C (maintained by an oil bath) for 20 h while open to
air (Table 1, entries 1−3). Using tert-amyl alcohol as the
solvent gave a better yield and exclusively resulted in ketone
product 3a in 57% NMR yield (entry 3). Increasing the
catalyst loading to 2 mol % (entry 4) resulted in a higher yield
of 3a (88%) along with a smaller amount of over-reduced
alcohol 3′a (5%). Replacing Cs CO with KOH, NaOH, or
ing ketones (3n−q) were isolated in moderate yields (38−
51%) when heteroaromatic or aliphatic primary alcohols were
tested. The reaction of 2.4 equiv of styrene oxide with 1,4-
phenylene dimethanol in the presence of 4 mol % catalyst and
20 mol % Cs CO gave corresponding diketone product 3r in a
60% yield. Finally, the reaction of styrene oxide with 2-
aminobenzyl alcohol provided 2-phenylquinoline (3s) in 27%
isolated yield.
2
3
t
KO Bu (entries 5−7) did not improve the activity.
Furthermore, decreasing the amount of styrene oxide (1a) to
either 0.75 or 0.6 mmol resulted in slightly lower yields (entry
2
3
8
or 9, respectively). Upon replacement of the NHC ligand in
the [IrCl(cod)(NHC)] complex with IMes (Ir-2) or IPr (Ir-3)
entry 10 or 11, respectively), better outcomes were achieved,
The reactions of benzyl alcohol with -Me-, -OMe-, -Cl-, -Br-,
(
or -CF -substituted styrene oxides and 2-(naphthalen-2-
3
with a 98% NMR yield (92% isolated yield) of product 3a
obtained with [IrCl(cod)(IMes)] (Ir-2) as the catalyst.
Additionally, when the reaction time was decreased to 16 h
yl)oxirane were robust, and the corresponding ketones 3t−y
were isolated with moderate to good yields (30−88%).
However, under similar conditions, when aliphatic 1,2-
epoxydodecane was reacted with benzyl alcohol, the formation
of a corresponding product 3z was detected in the reaction
(
(
entry 12), the activity was maintained. Control experiments
entries 13 and 14) demonstrated that both the catalyst and
1
the base are essential to the reaction. Finally, using inert
conditions did not improve the yield of the reaction (entry 15).
We next examined the scope of the reaction (Scheme 2).
First, styrene oxide (1a) was reacted with various primary
alcohols (2) under the optimized reaction conditions (Table 1,
entry 12). The reaction of 1a with a variety of electron-
mixture with a 32% yield determined by H NMR analysis
together with a number of other undesired side products. This
was probably due to more than one reactive α-carbon existing
in the molecule. Unfortunately, we failed to isolate 3z from the
complex reaction mixture.
The one-pot sequential epoxide opening/alkylation reaction
for the selective synthesis of β-alkylated alcohol product 3′a
upon addition of 2-propanol as an external hydrogen source at
a specified point during the reaction (Scheme 3) resulted in a
94% yield of the desired product. Similarly, dialkylated ketone
product 4a was also obtained in 48% yield upon addition of 1
donating and electron-withdrawing para- or ortho-substituted
i
benzyl alcohols having -Me, -OMe, - Pr, -Cl, -Br, -CF , or
3
-
NMe2 groups, 2-naphthalene methanol, and ferrocene
methanol afforded a range of ketone products (3b−m) with
good to excellent isolated yields (52−96%). The correspond-
5
230
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5229−5234