Han Gao et al.
COMMUNICATIONS
b) F. S. Han, M. Higuchi, D. G. Kurth, Tetrahedron
2008, 64, 9108; c) F. S. Han, M. Higuchi, D. G. Kurth,
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 559.
[13] M. Tobisu, T. Shimasaki, N. Chatani, Angew. Chem.
2008, 120, 4944; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4866.
[14] a) K. W. Quasdorf, X. Tian, N. K. Garg, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 14422; b) B.-T. Guan, Y. Wang, B.-J. Li,
D.-G. Yu, Z.-J. Shi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14468;
c) L. J. Gooben, K. Gooben, C. Stanciu, Angew. Chem.
2009, 121, 3621; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3569.
[15] a) K. W. Quasdorf, M. Riener, K. V. Petrova, N. K.
Garg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 17748; b) A.
Antoft-Finch, T. Blackburn, V. Snieckus, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 17750.
[16] We noted that only for very few special substrates, the
reaction could be proceeded with 1 mol% catalyst load-
ing, but still required the presence of excess ligand, see
ref.[6d]
[17] J. L. Bolliger, C. M. Frech, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 4075,
and references cited therein.
[5] For reviews on using triflates as substrates, see: a) Z.
Gilson, R. Larock, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4644, and ref-
erences cited therein; b) I. Baraznenok, V. Nenajdenko,
E. Balenkova, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3077.
[6] For some representative examples, see: a) D. Zim,
V. R. Lando, J. Dupont, A. L. Monteiro, Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 3049; b) H. N. Nguyen, X. Huang, S. L. Buch-
wald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11818; c) Z.-Y.
Tang, Q.-S. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3058;
d) V. Percec, G. M. Golding, J. Smidrkal, O. Weichold,
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3447; e) D. A. Wilson, C. J.
Wilson, B. M. Rosen, V. Percec, Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
4879; f) C. M. So, C. P. Lau, F. Y. Kwong, Angew.
Chem. 2008, 120, 8179; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
8059; g) J. Kuroda, K. Inamoto, K. Hiroya, T. Doi, Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 2251; h) T. Tao, H. Mao, C. Her-
bert, M. Xu, K. H. Dçtz, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46,
7796.
[7] For examples: a) J. P. Wolfe, R. A. Singer, B. H. Yang,
S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9550;
b) A. F. Littke, C. Dai, G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 4020; c) N. Kataoka, Q. Shelby, J. P. Stambu-
li, J. F. Hartwig, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5553.
[8] a) J. Yin, M. P. Rainka, X.-X. Zhang, S. L. Buchwald, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1162; b) B. Bhayana, B. P.
Fors, S. L. Buchwald, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3954.
[18] Y.-L. Zhao, Y. Li, Y. Li, L.-X. Gao, F.-S. Han, Chem.
Eur. J. 2010, 16, 4991.
[19] NiCl2ACTHNUTRGNEUG(N dppp) used in our experiments was prepared fol-
lowing the known method; see: G. R. Van Hecke,
W. D. Horrocks Jr, Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1968. NiCl2
(98%) was purchased from Stream Chemicals. Dppp li-
gands (>98%) was purchased from Shanghai Adamas
Reagent Co. Ltd.
[20] S. Caron, S. S. Massett, D. E. Bogle, M. J. Castaldi, T. F.
Braish, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2001, 5, 1704.
[21] For examples: a) G. Mann, J. F. Hartwig, M. S. Driver,
C. Fernꢃndez-Rivas, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 827;
b) J. P. Wolfe, H. Tomori, J. P. Sadighi, J. Yin, S. L.
Buchwald, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1158; c) X. Huang,
K. W. Anderson, D. Zim, L. Jiang, A. Klapars, S. L.
Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6653; d) B. P.
Fors, D. A. Watson, M. R. Biscoe, S. L. Buchwald, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13552; e) C. M. So, Z.
Zhou, C. P. Lau, F. Y. Kwong, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120,
6502; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6402.
[22] It should be mentioned that, as an exceptional exam-
ple, the cross-coupling of tosylate derivative of 3-N,N-
dimethylphenol is somewhat sluggish, affording the
biaryls in 57% average yield (Table 2, entry 7). The
reasons are not clear at this stage although the effect of
several possible factors such as temperature, reaction
time, and the purity of substrate were carefully exam-
ined.
[9] The approximate cost for PdCl2 (99%) is $91.20 per
gram; however, NiCl2 (98%) used in this work is $61.80
per 50 g (Aldrich catalogue, 2009–2010).
[10] The cost for the several frequently used phosphine li-
gands in conventional cross-coupling of aryl chlorides,
tosylates, and mesylates is 2-(di-tert-butylphosphino)bi-
phenyl (JohnPhos, 97%) is $99.10 per gram; 2-di-tert-
butylphosphino-2’-methylbiphenyl (t-BuMePhos, 97%)
is $213.50 per gram; 2-di-tert-butylphosphino-2’,4’,6’-
triisopropylbiphenyl (Xphos, 97%) is $99.10 per gram;
however, bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp, 97%)
used in this work is ca. $20.10 per gram, which makes it
one of the cheapest phosphine ligands in the chemical
price list (Aldrich catalogue, 2009–2010).
[11] F.-X. Felpin, E. Fouquet, C. Zakri, Adv. Synth. Catal.
2009, 351, 649.
[12] V. Percec, J.-Y. Bae, D. H. Hill, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
1060.
314
ꢁ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 309 – 314