1992 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, Vol. 51, No. 7
Letters
Scheme 1a
tococci, and Enterococci strains are presented in Table 1. In
addition to these strains, their antibacterial activity against
Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Entero-
coccus faecalis, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and
Haemophilus influenzae was also evaluated (Table 1).
The pleuromutilin analogues 4 and 6 exhibited remarkable
antibacterial activity against all Gram-positive pathogens includ-
ing MRSA, PRSP, and VRE, except for E. faecalis. In fact, 4
and 6 were not effective against the E. faecalis strain. Although
4 and 6 revealed almost the same profile of in vitro activity
against susceptible and resistant Gram-positive microorganisms
(MSSAa vs MRSA, PSSP vs PRSP, and VSE vs VRE), 6 showed
a particularly potent antibacterial activity against S. pyogenes
(MIC ) 0.032 µg/mL). Compound 6 was also found to be more
active against MRSA than all the marketed antibacterial agents
tested here except for VCM. More importantly, 6 exhibited
excellent antibacterial activity against susceptible and resistant
S. pneumoniae with an MIC of 0.063 µg/mL and appeared as
a possible alternative to the weak EM, MINO, and LVFX.
Furthermore, 6 was found to have excellent antibacterial activity
against S. epidermidis and relatively good potency against Gram-
negative organisms such as M. catarrhalis and H. influenzae,
both of which are common serious respiratory tract pathogens.
In particular, its antibacterial activity against S. epidermidis was
comparable to that of EM and MINO but significantly superior
to that of VCM or CTRX. VCM, the traditionally last resort
for serious infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens, is
not active against VCM-resistant Gram-positive organisms
including E. faecium. On the other hand, 6 exhibited superior
antibacterial activity against VCM-resistant E. faecium strain
(MIC ) 0.063 µg/mL) compared to CTRX, EM, or LVFX. In
general, 6 displayed potent antibacterial activity against MRSA,
PRSP, and VRE pathogens, while marketed antibacterial agents
were less active than 6 or inactive against these pathogens.
As shown in Table 2, 6 and five reference agents, i.e.,
ampicillin (ABPC), clarithromycin (CAM), MINO, VCM, and
LVFX, were further evaluated for their in vitro activity against
nine anaerobe and two mycoplasma strains. While 6 showed
excellent activity against all anaerobe and mycoplasma strains,
the reference agents appeared to have moderate to weak activity
against some anaerobe and/or mycoplasma strains.
a Reagent and conditions: (i) ethyl acrylate or ethyl 3-bromopropionate,
K2CO3, DMF, 80 °C, 64%; (ii) tert-butyl 1-piperazinecarboxylate, N,N-
diisopropylethylamine, 2-propanol, reflux, 20 h, 92%; (iii) 2 M NaOH/
MeOH, reflux, 2 h, then citric acid/H2O, 94%.
Scheme 2a
a Reagent and conditions: (i) di-tert-butyl dicarbonate, CHCl3, room temp,
2 h; (ii) diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, Ph3P, THF, -20 °C, 0.5 h then
thioacetic acid, -10 °C to room temp, 0.5 h, 98%.
Scheme 3a
a Reagent and conditions: (i) 13, t-BuOK, MeOH, reflux, 2 h, then 14,
0 °C to room temp, overnight, 98%; (ii) 30% HCl/EtOH, room temp, 2 h,
98%; (iii) 10, benzotriazole-1-yloxytris(pyrrolidino)phosphonium hexafluo-
rophosphate, Et3N, DMF, room temp, 2 h, 72%; (iv) 4 M HCl/AcOEt, room
temp, 2 h, 97%.
chloropurine (7) with ethyl acrylate or ethyl 3-bromopropionate
gave the 9-purine propionic ester 8 in moderate yield. Treatment
of 8 with 1-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)piperazine in refluxing 2-pro-
panol followed by alkaline hydrolysis of the resulting ester 9
produced 10 in good yield.
Next, 6, 4, CTRX, EM, MINO, VCM, and LVFX were
examined for their in vivo efficacy (ED50) against lethal S.
aureus (MSSA and MRSA) and S. pneumoniae (PSSP and
PRSP) systemic infection model in mice (Table 3). Compounds
4 and 6 and VCM showed moderate to potent protective effects
against MRSA and PRSP strains compared with other marketed
antibacterial agents. However, as in vitro evaluation, the in vivo
antibacterial activity of 6 was more potent than that of 4.
Interestingly, 6 and VCM exhibited superior ED50 values (about
1-2 mg/kg) when given intravenously regardless of the
frequency of dosing (once or twice), indicating the potential of
6 as an antibacterial agent with efficacy equal to that of VCM.
The other reference agents showed relatively poor in vivo
antibacterial efficacy against drug-resistant strains.
The efficacy of compounds 4 and 6, given orally twice a day,
against S. aureus Smith (MSSA) was next evaluated. While 4
had an ED50 of 13.3 mg/kg, po, the ED50 of 6 was more than
50 mg/kg, po (data not shown).
Finally, the efficacy of 6 and the reference agents EM and
VCM was examined in a pulmonary infection model in which
The intermediate piperidine thioester 13 was prepared by
Mitsunobu reaction of 1-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-4-hydroxypip-
eridine (12), which was obtained in excellent yield from reaction
of 4-hydroxypiperidine (11) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate, with
thioacetic acid (Scheme 2).
Compound 6 was prepared as shown in Scheme 3. Reaction
of mutilin 14-tosyloxyacetate8,9 14 with the 4-piperidinethiol,
which was generated by treatment of the thioester 13 with
t-BuOK/MeOH, followed by deprotection of Boc group in the
resultant 15 afforded 16 in excellent yield. Condensation of 16
with 10 in the presence of benzotriazole-1-yloxytris(pyrrolidi-
no)phosphonium hexafluorophosphate as a coupling agent and
successive acid hydrolysis of the resultant 17 gave the desired
6 as a hydrochloride with good solubility in water (∼50 mg/
mL).
The in vitro antibacterial activity of 6, the earlier pleuromutilin
analogue 4, and other marketed antibacterial agents, i.e., a
cephalosporin ceftriaxone (CTRX), a macrolide erythromycin
(EM), a tetracycline minocycline (MINO), a glycopeptide
vancomycin (VCM), and a quinolone levofloxacin (LVFX), was
determined by broth microdilution according to standard pro-
cedures.16 Their minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs)
against drug-susceptible and/or -resistant Staphylococci, Strep-
a Abbreviations: MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; PSSP, penicil-
lin-susceptible S. pneumoniae; VSE, vancomycin-susceptible enterococci.