Angewandte
Chemie
manner. The chiral silver phosphate generated in situ from
(R)-1a and Ag2CO3 was also examined (Table 2, entry 7).
However, preprepared Ag[(R)-1a] displayed slightly higher
enantioselectivity than that of the catalyst generated in situ.
We then explored the use of other additives to improve the
enantioselectivity of the reaction (Table 2, entries 8–10). The
addition of 3 ꢀ and 4 ꢀ molecular sieves (MS) significantly
retarded the reaction, and the starting ketone 2a was not
consumed completely, even after 2 days (Table 2, entries 8
and 9, respectively). In particular, a considerable reduction in
both the chemical yield and the ee value was observed in the
presence of 4 ꢀ MS. In contrast, when 5 ꢀ MS were used as
an additive, even higher enantioselectivity was observed
without any detrimental effect on the chemical yield (Table 2,
entry 10).
exchange, regenerates the catalytic species and releases the
isochromene product 4.[15,16]
Having identified the sequential process involving an
isobenzopyrylium reactive intermediate, the scope of the
reaction was then investigated with a range of alkynylaryl
ketones 2 under the optimized reaction conditions. A broad
range of alkynylaryl ketones are applicable to the present
sequential transformation, although reactivity and enantiose-
lectivity are highly dependent on the nature of the substitu-
ents (Table 3). When alkyl and aryl groups were introduced at
Table 3: Scope of the chiral silver phosphate catalyzed transformation of
2 into 4.[a]
Next, we explored the mechanism of the silver phosphate
catalyzed sequential transformation of 2 into 4 to confirm the
participation of the isobenzopyrylium ion as the reactive
intermediate. From a mechanistic viewpoint, it can be
considered that there are two possible reaction pathways.
One pathway involves intramolecular cyclization followed by
enantioselective reduction of the isobenzopyrylium inter-
mediate (Scheme 1). However, the same product would be
obtained if the reactions occurred in the reverse order, that is,
reduction to the alcohol, followed by cyclization.[14] To verify
the order of the reaction sequence, we conducted a control
Entry 2 (R1, R2, R3)
t [h]
4
Yield [%][b] ee [%][c]
1
2
3
2b (Me, 4-MeC6H4-, H)
11
10
5
9
6
6
2
24
26
26
30
4b
4c
4d
4e
4 f
4g
4h
4i
98
87
92
95
89
89
89
85
81
81
84
81
67
80
81
82
87
22
92
90
91[d]
91
91
88
90
49
2c (Me, 4-CF3C6H4-, H)
2d (Me, 4-MeOC6H4-, H)
2e (nPr, Ph, H)
4
experiment with alcohol
6 as a possible intermediate
5
2 f (iBu, Ph, H)
(Scheme 2). When compound 6 was subjected to the catalytic
6
2g (Me, Ph, F)
7
2h (Me, nBu, H)
8
2i (Ph, Ph, H)
9
2j (4-MeOC6H4-, Ph, H)
2k (4-BrC6H4-, Ph, H)
2l (4-CF3C6H4-, Ph, H)
2m (3-MeOC6H4-, Ph, H) 29
2n (2-TBSOC6H4-, Ph, H) 24
4j
4k
4l
10
11
12
13
14
15
4m 81
4n
4o
4p
90
68
86
2o (Ph, Ph, F)
2p (Ph, nBu, H)
28
8
Scheme 2. Mechanistic study: control experiment.
[a] Reactions were carried out with Ag[(R)-1a] (0.015 mmol, 10 mol%), 2
(0.15 mmol), and 3 (0.165 mmol, 1.1 equiv). For 2b–h, reactions were
carried out with 3a (R=Et) in THF (0.75 mL) in the presence of 5 ꢀ MS
(75 mg). For 2i–p, reactions were carried out with 3b (R=Me) in EtOAc
(0.75 mL) in the absence of MS. [b] Yield of isolated 4. [c] The ee value of
4 was determined by chiral-stationary-phase HPLC analysis. [d] The
absolute configuration of 4k was determined to be S by X-ray crystallo-
graphic analysis.[17] See the Supporting Information for details.
reaction under the influence of Ag[(R)-1a] (10 mol%) with-
out the Hantzsch ester, the reaction proceeded with very low
conversion, even after 6 h, and product 5a of 5-exo cyclization
was obtained in 10% yield, whereas almost none of the
desired 6-endo cyclization product 4a was observed. This
behavior is in contrast to that of the present reaction of the
primary substrate 2a, which afforded the 6-endo cyclization
product 4a exclusively in excellent yield within 4 h in the
presence of the Hantzsch ester (Table 2, entry 1). Therefore,
these results strongly suggest that alcohol 6 is not involved as
an intermediate in the present sequential transformation, and
that the isobenzopyrylium species participates as the key
intermediate, as shown in Scheme 1. Thus, it was concluded
that the reaction is initiated by the coordination of Ag[(R)-1]
the R1 and R2 positions, respectively (Table 3, entries 1–6),
these substrates exhibited relatively high reactivity and
afforded isochromene derivatives 4 in high yields. However,
in terms of the enantioselectivity, the introduction of a para
substituent on the aromatic group at the R2 position
(substrates 2b–d) led to a slight decrease in enantioselectivity
as compared to that observed with the primary substrate 2a
(R2 = Ph). Substrates bearing linear or branched alkyl chains
at the R1 position (2e and 2 f, respectively) also underwent the
reaction with a slight reduction in enantioselectivity, whereas
fluoro substitution on the tethering benzene ring (2g) did not
compromise the stereochemical outcome. However, the
introduction of an alkyl substituent at the R2 position led to
À
to the C C triple bond of 2. This interaction induces
intramolecular nucleophilic attack by the carbonyl oxygen
atom to generate an ion pair consisting of the isobenzopyry-
lium ion and the chiral phosphate. Subsequent enantioselec-
tive reduction by Hantzsch ester 3, followed by metal–proton
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 235 –239
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
237