Deposition of coke leads to a decrease in the concentrations of
both the Brꢀnsted and Lewis sites though the eect seems to be
not very important (Table 2). The smallest eect has been
observed for the Al-MCM-41(15) sample exhibiting the lowest
amount of coke remaining after the thermal treatment.
A decrease in the concentration of the Brꢀnsted sites has also
been observed in the case of coked dealuminated HY zeo-
lites,33,34 but, as opposed to our Al-MCM-41 results, the for-
mation of a comparable amount of coke did not in¯uence the
properties of the Lewis sites in HY. The results of the thermo-
desorption of pyridine suggest that deposition of coke practi-
cally does not in¯uence the acid strength of the Brꢀnsted sites.
The relatively small dierences between the acid site con-
centrations determined before and after the conversion of
cyclohexene indicate that pyridine can penetrate to the acid
centres in spite of the surface being blocked by the deposits. The
ease of this penetration depends presumably on the deposit
composition. It has to be taken into account that the thermal
treatment of the coked samples at 620 K under nitrogen and the
subsequent activation at 630 K under vacuum may easily con-
tribute to a further partial removal of the coke deposits from the
examined samples.
Brꢀnsted sites. Thus, pyridine seems to be able to penetrate to
the acid centres in spite the surface blocking by the carbo-
naceous deposits. This penetration depends presumably on the
deposit composition and likely on a possible further partial
removal of coke during the pretreatment of the samples before
the adsorption of pyridine.
Acknowledgement
Thanks are due to Mr. Pawel Baran (Jagiellonian University,
Krakow) for the IR measurements.
References
1
C.-Y. Chen, H.-X. Li and M. E. Davis, Microporous Mater., 1993,
2, 17.
2
3
4
S. A. Bagshaw, E. Prouzet and T. J. Pinnavaia, Science, 1995, 269, 1242.
A. Tuel and S. Gontier, Chem. Mater., 1996, 8, 114.
Z. Luan, H. He, W. Zhou, C.-F. Cheng and J. Klinowski, J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday T rans., 1995, 91, 2955.
5
6
7
8
9
A. Sayari, P. Liu, M. Kruk and M. Jaroniec, Chem. Mater., 1997,
9, 2499.
M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, R. Ryoo and J. M. Kim, Microporous
Mater., 1997, 12, 93.
M. Jaroniec, M. Kruk and A. Sayari, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1998,
117, 325.
A. Sayari, C. Danumah and I. L. Moudrakovski, Chem. Mater.,
1995, 7, 813.
Conclusions
The studied Al-MCM-41 materials dier in the concentrations
of the Brꢀnsted and Lewis acid sites, which generally increase
with the Al content up to a limiting value. An Al content
exceeding this limit does not result in any further acid sites as,
probably, aluminium atoms form clusters (which are inert)
and=or are present to a higher degree in the material walls. The
fact that conversion of cyclohexene occurs over Al-MCM-41
indicates that among the Brꢀnsted sites are those of strong
acidity. The conversion rises with both the Al content and
reaction temperature, both of which increase the acidity of the
catalysts. The process follows mainly two concurrent
mechanisms, i.e., cyclohexene skeletal isomerisation and
hydrogen transfer, resulting in the formation of the C6
hydrocarbons that predominate under all conditions studied.
Cracking and alkylation accompany these two reactions, as
indicated by volatile products comprising compounds with 1±5,
7, and 8 carbon atoms. All these processes require the presence
of acid sites in the catalysts.
The kinds of the products and the high selectivity toward the
C6 compounds are not in¯uenced by the concentration of
cyclohexene within the applied limits of 5 and 16%. The only
exception is the formation of small amounts of the C9 species
at the higher concentration of cyclohexene. However, the
distribution of the products varies, i.e., the contents of C1±C5
are lower and the contents of C7±C8 are higher at the lower
concentration of cyclohexene.
A. Sayari, I. L. Moudrakovski, C. Danumah, C. I. Ratclie, J. A.
Ripmeester and K. F. Preston, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 16 373.
10 A. Corma, M. T. Navarro and J. Perez-Pariente, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1994, 147.
11 P. T. Tanev, M. Chibwe and T. J. Pinnavaia, Nature, 1994, 368, 321.
12 A. Sayari, K. M. Reddy and I. L. Moudrakovski, Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal., 1995, 98, 19.
13 K. M. Reddy, I. L. Moudrakovski and A. Sayari, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1994, 1059.
14 C.-F. Cheng, H. He, W. Zhou, J. Klinowski, J. A. S. Goncalves
and L. F. Gladden, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 390.
15 J.-B. Kim and T. Inui, Catal. L ett., 1996, 36, 255.
16 A. Corma, A. Martinez, V. Martinez-Soria and J. B. Monton,
J. Catal., 1995, 153, 25.
17 K. Ross, A. Liepold, W. Reschetilowski, R. Schmidt, A. Karlsson
and M. Stoecker, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1995, 94, 389.
18 K. M. Reddy and C. Song, Catal. Today, 1996, 31, 137.
19 J. Aguado, D. P. Serrano, M. D. Romero and J. M. Escola,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1996, 725.
20 M. Rozwadowski, M. Lezanska, J. Wloch, K. Erdmann,
R. Golembiewski and J. Kornatowski, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
2000, 2, 5510.
21 J. A. Navio, G. Colon, M. Macias, J. M. Campelo, A. A. Romero
and J. M. Marinas, J. Mol. Catal. A., 1998, 135, 155.
22 W.-C. Cheng and K. Rajagopalan, J. Catal., 1989, 119, 354.
23 J. A. Navio, G. Colon, M. Macias, J. M. Campelo, A. A. Romero
and J. M. Marinas, J. Catal., 1996, 161, 605.
24 N. R. E. Radwan and M. M. Selim, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 1996,
105, 747.
As in the case of the other substrate concentration,20,29,30 the
process of the conversion results in the formation of carbo-
naceous deposits containing both aliphatic and aromatic
compounds. Coke forms primarily on the Al atoms located in
the pores and creating strong Brꢀnsted acid sites; thus, its
amount increases with the Al content of the catalyst.
Increasing the temperature of the conversion causes a decrease
in the coke amount as the deposits that are weakly bound to
the surface (probably aliphatics) desorb and move away, while
the other (presumably aromatics) ``distil'' and adsorb on the
external surface of the material, forming mostly multilayered
polyaromatic structures.
25 D. E. Hunka, T. Picciotto, D. M. Jaramillo and D. P. Land, Surf.
Sci., 1999, 421, L166.
26 A. Fasi, I. Palinko, T. Katona and M. Bartok, J. Catal., 1997, 167,
215.
27 A. Bunjes, I. Eilks, M. Pahlke and B. Ralle, J. Chem. Educ., 1997,
74, 1323.
28 M. Rozwadowski, M. Lezanska, J. Wloch, K. Erdmann,
R. Golembiewski and J. Kornatowski, L angmuir, 2001, 17, 2112.
29 M. Rozwadowski, M. Lezanska, J. Wloch, K. Erdmann,
R. Golembiewski and J. Kornatowski, Chem. Mater., 2001, 13,
1609.
30 M. Rozwadowski, M. Lezanska, J. Wloch, K. Erdmann,
G. Zadrozna and J. Kornatowski, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 2001, 135,
4207.
31 D. M. Bibby, R. F. Howe and G. D. McLellan, Appl. Catal., 1992, 93, 1.
32 J. Weglarski, J. Datka, H. He and J. Klinowski, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday T rans., 1996, 92, 5161.
33 H. S. Cerqueira, P. Ayrault, J. Datka and M. Guisnet, Micro-
porous Mesoporous Mater., 2000, 38, 197.
Coke causes a decrease in the conversion, which conse-
quently indicates an apparent decrease in the concentrations of
both the Brꢀnsted and Lewis sites, i.e., decrease in the eective
concentrations. Thermodesorption of pyridine shows relatively
small dierences between the concentrations before and after
the conversion and no dierence in the acid strength of the
34 H. S. Cerqueira, P. Ayrault, J. Datka, P. Magnoux and
M. Guisnet, J. Catal., 2000, 196, 149.
5086
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001, 3, 5082±5086