(Au particles dispersed on NiO; Table S2w). This experimental
observation strongly indicates that NiO@Au ensembles
are formed during the reaction and their synergistic effect
contributes to promoting the low-temperature activity. Such a
special synergistic effect has also been reported with the partial
coverage of Au with TiO2 and CeO2 or Pt with FeO catalyst
systems.7
and stabilizing them, but also in serving as an active O
specimens reservoir, due to the fact that XPS peaks from
Ni2O3 rather than NiO are apparently decreased along with
the disappearance of the Au4f peak of Au+ after TPD
(Fig. 1d). Similarly, it has been reported that CeO2 could
stabilize Aud+ in Au/CeO2 catalyst, and conversely, the Aud+
could increase the amount of surface active oxygen.9 There-
fore, the above results suggest that O species coming from the
Ni2O3–Au+ hybrid sites rather than the lattice O of Ni2O3 are
active for the low-temperature selective oxidation of alcohols
by the direct-oxidation dehydrogenation route.1d This is quite
different from the catalytic dehydrogenation mechanism on
our previously-developed Au/Cu-fiber catalyst.3b
Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) was used to
obtain information about the synergistic effect of NiO@Au-NPs
anchored on Ni-fiber. The pre-activated catalysts with various
Au loadings all showed a single O2 desorption signal at
B510 1C, with maximum over the Au-4/Ni-fiber (Fig. 1c).
The signal ratio (i.e., the peak area of each sample divided by
the peak area of Au-1/Ni-fiber) correlated linearly well with
the benzyl alcohol conversion. Moreover, the conversion
tended to approach zero when extrapolating to a zero TPD
signal (Fig. 1c, inset). This coincided strongly with the
observation that benzyl alcohol conversion on the pre-
activated Au-4/Ni-fiber decreased to o1% within a few
minutes after switching off the O2 gas, and the TPD signal
of the catalyst dramatically decreased, nearly to zero accord-
ingly (Fig. S9, ESIw). Additionally, the extremely weak signal
for Au-4/Ti-fiber significantly increased after post NiO-doping
(NiO@Au/Ti-fiber) to B80% of that for Au-4/Ni-fiber
(Fig. S10w), consistent with the promotion of benzyl alcohol
conversion from 8% to 87% (Table S2w). In contrast,
Au@NiO/Ni-fiber provided a much weaker TPD signal at
B580 1C (Fig. S11w), thereby obtaining a much lower
conversion (39%) of benzyl alcohol.
Galvanic deposition of Au onto a sinter-locked Ni-fiber
delivers an excellent Au/Ni-fiber catalyst for low-temperature
gas-phase alcohol oxidation. Partial coverage of Au particles
with NiO segments (NiO@Au-NPs ensembles) formed on the
Ni-fiber during the reaction contributed to a high surface
concentration of Ni2O3–Au+ hybrid sites thereby leading to
more highly active O species. This significantly promotes the
low-temperature activity of gas-phase selective oxidation of
alcohols.
We thank the NSF of China (20973063, 21076083), the
MOST of China (2011CB201403), the Fundamental Research
Funds for the Central Universities, the Shanghai Rising-Star
Program (10HQ1400800), the Shanghai Leading Academic
Discipline Project (B409), and the Shanghai Synchrotron
Radiation Facility for helpful discussion.
Fig. 1d shows the XPS spectra of O1s, Au4f, and Ni2p for
the pre-activated Au-4/Ni-fiber samples. A large amount of
Ni2O3 specimens were formed, attributable to the strong peaks
for O1s at 531.8 eV and Ni2p at 856.2 eV. Notice that Au+
specimens were clearly detected with the Au4f (7/2) peak at
84.8 eV (surface Au+/Ni3+ ratio: 1/45), and OH species were
generally adsorbed to provide an O1s peak also at approxi-
mately 532 eV.8 Interestingly, the O1s peak at 531.8 eV
decreased significantly while the 529.7 eV O1s peak (lattice
O of NiO (Table S4, ESIw)) almost remained unchanged after
the TPD experiments. Meanwhile, the Au4f (7/2) peak for
Au+ at 84.8 eV disappeared completely, and the Ni2p peak
area for Ni2O3 at 856.2 eV decreased by B56%, which nearly
stoichiometrically agreed with reduction of the O1s peak for
Ni2O3 (Discussion 4 and Table S4w). As expected, on the same
sample after the TPD, as shown in Fig. 1d, an extremely low
conversion of o1% was obtained when reacting with benzyl
alcohol at 280 1C in the absence of O2, indicating that only
Ni2O3 in the absence of Au+ is inactive for the alcohol
oxidation. Moreover, disappearance of Au+ was also observed
by XPS on the reactive samples after switching off the O2 feed
followed by a 15 min reaction with benzyl alcohol alone, in
which the benzyl alcohol conversion decreased from 99%
to o1% (Fig. S9w). Therefore, the interaction between NiO
segments and Au–NPs, by nature, not only induces a high
surface concentration of Au+ specimens (surface Au+/Au0
ratio: 1/2) but also creates unique Ni2O3–Au+ hybrid sites.
Among such hybrid sites, Ni2O3 specimens likely play a key
role not only in promoting the formation of Au+ specimens
Notes and references
1 (a) T. Mallat and A. Baiker, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 3037;
(b) A. S. K. Hashmi and G. J. Hutchings, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 7896; (c) A. Corma and H. Garcia, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008,
37, 2096; (d) J. L. Gong and C. B. Mullins, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009,
42, 1063.
2 (a) D. I. Enache, J. K. Edwards, P. Landon, B. Solsna-Espriu,
A. F. Carely, A. A. Herzing, M. Watanabe, C. J. Kiely,
D. W. Knight and G. J. Hutchings, Science, 2006, 311, 362;
(b) S. Biella and M. Rossi, Chem. Commun., 2003, 378;
(c) C. D. Pina, E. Falletta and M. Rossi, J. Catal., 2008, 260, 384;
(d) J. Fan, Y. H. Dai, Y. L. Li, N. F. Zheng, J. F. Guo, X. Q. Yan
and G. D. Stucky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 15568; (e) G. Ma,
X. Yan, Y. Li, L. Xiao, Z. Huang, Y. Lu and J. Fan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 9596.
3 (a) M. M. Deng, G. F. Zhao, Q. S. Xue, L. Chen and Y. Lu, Appl.
Catal., B, 2010, 99, 222; (b) G. F. Zhao, H. Y. Hu, M. M. Deng and
Y. Lu, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 55.
4 (a) D. K. Harris, D. R. Cahela and B. J. Tatarchuk, Composites,
Part A, 2001, 32, 1117; (b) Y. Lu, H. Wang, Y. Liu, Q. S. Xue,
L. Chen and M. Y. He, Lab Chip, 2007, 7, 133.
5 (a) R. Zanella, S. Giorgio, C. R. Henry and C. Louis, J. Phys. Chem.
B, 2002, 106, 7634; (b) A. Wittstock, V. Zielasek, J. Biener,
C. M. Friend and M. Baumer, Science, 2009, 327, 319.
¨
6 (a) M. S. Chen and D. G. Goodman, Science, 2004, 306, 252;
(b) B. K. Min and C. M. Friend, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 2709.
7 (a) T. Fujitani, I. Nakamura, T. Akita, M. Okumura and
M. Haruta, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9515; (b) C. M. Y.
Yeung, K. M. K. Yu, Q. J. Fu, D. Thompsett, M. I. Petch and
S. C. Tsang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 18010; (c) Q. Fu,
W. X. Li, Y. Yao, H. Liu, H. Y. Su, D. Ma, X. K. Gu, L. Chen,
Z. Wang, B. Wang and X. Bao, Science, 2010, 328, 1141.
8 L. C. Wang, L. He, Q. Liu, Y. M. Liu, M. Chen, Y. Cao, H. Y. He
and K. N. Fan, Appl. Catal., A, 2008, 344, 150.
9 Q. Fu, H. Saltsburg and M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Science,
2003, 301, 935.
c
9644 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9642–9644
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011