Z. Jia et al. / Catalysis Communications 73 (2016) 80–83
81
Fig. 1. Mechanism of ADN hydrogenation.
2
.2. Catalyst characterization
The XRD patterns of the catalysts are shown in Fig. 2. Ni
NiCR/SiO
tallites. Louis et al. [14] investigated the Ni/SiO
C
/SiO
2
and
2
gave very sharp peaks, which indicated large NiO and Ni crys-
catalyst and found out
The specific surface area and pore structure of the support and two
2
catalysts were determined by N
instrument. The crystalline phase of the catalysts was characterized by
a Bruker Advance D8 X-ray diffractometer with a Cu Kα radiation
2 2
source. The H uptake of the catalysts was determined by H chemisorp-
2
adsorption with a Quadrasorb SI
the existence of nickel phyllosilicates, which were located at the surface
of silica and acted as the anchoring sites for the NiO and Ni particles. Cal-
cination led to the decomposition of the nickel phyllosilicates and the
migration of NiO, which resulted in large Ni particles after reduction.
tion on a Quantachrome ChemBET Pulsar TPR/TPD instrument. The
active Ni area was calculated assuming H/Nisurface = 1 and a surface
2
In the case of NiDR/SiO , NiO was reduced to Ni before the decomposi-
tion of the anchoring sites. The broader diffraction peaks of the Ni
phase indicated smaller Ni crystallite sizes [15]. In this moderate reduc-
tion process, the Ni species were not completely reduced to the metallic
−
20
2
area of 6.5 × 10
m per Ni atom [13]. A JEM-2010 transmission
electron microscope (TEM, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were employed to
examine the Ni particle size of the catalysts.
state and some NiO reflexes were present in the XRD pattern of NiDR
SiO . However, the H uptake by NiDR/SiO (76.2 μmol/g) was five
times that of NiCR/SiO (15.4 μmol/g), corresponding to the active nickel
/
2
2
2
2
.3. Catalytic reaction
2
2
areas of 6.0 and 1.2 m /g (Table 1). The NiDR/SiO
excellent H chemisorption ability due to its superior Ni dispersion.
The TEM images of the two catalysts are presented in Fig. 3. The sizes
of most of the Ni particles on NiDR/SiO were around 10 nm, while those
on NiCR/SiO were much larger, which was in accordance with the XRD
and H uptake results.
2
catalyst exhibited
The hydrogenation of ADN was carried out in a stainless steel auto-
2
clave equipped with a temperature control system and magnetic stirrer.
Typically, 5 g ADN (98%, Alfa Aesar), 80 mL of methanol (N99.5%, Beijing
Chemical Works), 5 g pre-reduced catalyst and 0.1 g NaOH (N96.0%, Bei-
jing Chemical Works) were added into the reactor. The hydrogenation
conditions were: 80 °C, 3 MPa, 500 rpm. The products were sampled on-
line and were analyzed by a gas chromatograph (GC 7890F, Techcomp
Instrument Company) equipped with a flame ionization detector and
a KB-624 capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 1.8 μm, Kromat). The
condensation byproducts were secondary and tertiary amines with a
high molecular weight which were not eluted in the GC. Dimethyl
phthalate was used as the internal standard to determine the content
of ADN, ACN and HMD. The conversion of ADN and the selectivity to
ACN and HMD were calculated as:
2
2
2
3.2. Catalytic hydrogenation of ADN
Fig. 1 showed that ADN was selectively hydrogenated to ACN and
then to HMD. The change in the concentration of ACN with time showed
the presence of a consecutive reaction mechanism and the maximum
ACN yield occurred at a particular reaction time [11]. Since both ACN
and HMD are useful products, their selectivity should be a target used
to evaluate the catalytic performance.
Table 2 shows the results from the hydrogenation of ADN over NiDR
SiO and NiCR/SiO . As seen in Group 3 and 4, NiDR/SiO exhibited
superior hydrogenation activity with 86% ADN conversion in 80 min
compared to NiCR/SiO with 82% ADN conversion after a reaction time
/
moles of converted ADN
moles of ADN feedstock
2
2
2
ADN conversion ¼
ACN selectivity ¼
HMD selectivity ¼
ꢀ 100%:
ꢀ 100%:
ꢀ 100%:
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
ð3Þ
2
of 360 min. The selectivity to the primary amine products (ACN and
HMD) over NiDR/SiO was also higher than that over Ni /SiO because
moles of ACN
moles of converted ADN
2
CR
2
of less condensation byproduct formation. HMI was formed on both
catalysts, but its selectivity over NiDR/SiO was higher than that over
NiCR/SiO , which was different from the selectivity to the condensation
2
moles of HMD
moles of converted ADN
2
byproducts.
Table 1
3
. Results and discussion
.1. Catalyst characterization
Table 1 summarized the physical properties of SiO
Surface area, pore structure and metallic Ni surface area of SiO
2 2 2
, NiCR/SiO and NiDR/SiO .
Sample
S
/
BET
Pore volume
Pore size
/nm
Surface area of Ni
3
m2 g−1
/cm
3
g
−1
/m g
2
−1
2
and two
SiO
NiCR/SiO2
NiDR/SiO
2
245
188
203
0.9
0.7
0.7
17.8
17.7
17.4
2
1.2
6.0
2
catalysts. The SiO had a specific surface area of 245 m /g and a pore
volume of 0.9 cm /g, which decreased after the introduction of Ni.
3
2