Table 1 Thermal stability of lactam-based Brønsted-acidic ILs
IL
[CP][BF4]
168 ◦
[CP][CH3SO3]
186 ◦
[CP][NO3]
100 ◦
[CP][TFA]
87 ◦
[NMP][BF4]
130 ◦
[NMP][CH3SO3]
160 ◦
[NMP][NO3]
78 ◦
[NMP][TFA]
75 ◦
C
a
Td
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
a Td was recorded with 10% of mass loss of IL.
Methyl yellow (MY) (15 mg L-1, pKa=3.3), 4-
phenylazodiphenylamine (PADA) (10 mg L-1, pKa=1.5)
and 2-nitrophenylamine (NPA) (5 mg L-1, pKa=-0.2) in
dichloromethane were chosen as the basic indicators. The
concentration of each lactam-based Brønsted-acidic IL was set
at 80 mmol L-1 in dichloromethane.
Experimental
General remarks
All commercial chemicals were used as received. NMR measure-
ments were performed on a Bru¨ker AV-400 Fourier transform
NMR spectrometer using an inner capillary filled with CDCl3
1
for H and 13C NMR. Chemical shifts were reported in parts
Esterification procedure
per million (ppm, d). Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was
performed with a Simultaneous Thermal Analysis-STA 409EP.
The thermal decomposition temperature (Td) was recorded with
10% mass loss of lactam-based Brønsted-acidic ILs, with a
scan rate of 10 C min-1 under a N2 atmosphere. UV-visible
spectroscopy was conducted on a Shimadzu 2100 UV-visible
spectrophotometer.
The reaction was carried out in a glass reactor with a reflux
condenser and oil-bath. The acid and alcohol were added
to the lactam-based Brønsted-acidic IL. The esterification
was performed under different profiles of reaction time and
temperature with vigorous stirring. Qualitative and quantitative
analyses were conducted with an Agilent 7890A/5975C GC/MS
and a capillary GC (Rtx-1: 30 m ¥ 0.25 mm ¥ 0.25 mm) equipped
with a flame ionization detector, respectively. The concentration
of reactant and product were calculated using butyl butyrate as
an internal standard. After the reaction, the ester and IL were
separated by decantation. The IL was reused after removal of
water under 1–5 mmHg vacuum at 110 ◦C for 1 h.
◦
Preparation and characterization
Two series of lactam-based Brønsted-acidic ILs [NMP][X] and
[CP][X] (X = BF4, NO3, CH3SO3 and TFA (trifluoroacetate))
were synthesized according to the procedure previously reported
in the literature.25,26 As an example, the Brønsted-acidic IL
caprolactam trifluoroacetate ([CP][TFA]) was synthesized as
following.
Results and discussion
Benzene (30 mL) was added to a 100 mL flask containing
11.32 g of CP (0.10 mol) with stirring. Then, 11.40 g triflu-
oroacetic acid (0.10 mol) was added dropwise into the above
flask, which was immersed in an ice bath, within ca. 20 min.
After 4 h at room temperature, benzene was removed under
reduced pressure. The resultant was further dried at 90 ◦C under
1–5 mmHg for 1 h, affording the IL [CP][TFA].
The lactam-based Brønsted-acidic ILs were synthesized with
high yields of 92–98%. Most of them were miscible with polar
organic solvents such as 1-butanol, acetonitrile, and acetic acid
but insoluble or partly soluble in non-polar organic solvents such
as benzene, ethyl ether, and n-butyl acetate. The solubility of ILs
in reaction mixture can be measured according to the procedure
described in the literature using UV-visible spectroscopy.28 For
instance, the solubility of IL [CP][CH3SO3] in n-butyl acetate
was as low as 0.54 g per 100 mL, while the solubility was 194 g
per 100 mL in acetic acid and 170 g per 100 mL in 1-butanol. The
thermal stability of these Brønsted-acidic ILs was characterized
by the thermal decomposition temperature (Td) in Table 1 and
was found to be in the range 75–186 ◦C.
1
The NMR data for the IL [CP][TFA] were as follows: H
NMR (CDCl3): 1.67–1.79 (m, 6H), 2.50 (q, J = 5.2, 2H), 3.28
(q, J = 5.6, 2H), 8.43 (s, 1H), 14.81 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3):
22.38, 28.07, 29.94, 34.83, 43.13, 110.83–119.39 (q, CF3, J =
288.0), 160.80, 181.57. Td ([CP][TFA]) = 87 ◦C.
Acidity measurement
The acidities of these Brønsted-acidic ILs, characterized as
the value H0, are reported in Table 2. The results indicated that
among the lactam-based Brønsted-acidic ILs studied, the IL
[NMP][BF4] had the strongest relative acidity of H0 = -0.25,
while the IL [CP][TFA] showed the weakest relative acidity of
H0 = 4.56. The relative acidities of the Brønsted-acidic ILs
had the following order of H0 value: [NMP][BF4] (-0.25) >
[CP][BF4] (-0.22) > [NMP][CH3SO3] (0.95) > [CP][CH3SO3]
(0.98) > [NMP][NO3] (2.83) > [CP][NO3] (2.94) > [NMP][TFA]
(4.46) > [CP][TFA] (4.56). Clearly, the anions played a crucial
role in defining the acidity of the Brønsted-acidic ILs. Changing
the anions in the Brønsted-acidic ILs could bring about large
differences in the H0 value. For example, the H0 values of ILs
[CP][BF4], [CP][NO3] and [CP][TFA] were -0.22, 2.94 and 4.56,
respectively. However, the effect of cations on the H0 value was
The acidic scales of the lactam-based Brønsted-acidic ILs were
measured by UV-vis spectra with basic indicators according to
the procedure reported in the literature.25,27 Based on eqn (1),
where H0 is the Hammett acidity function which represents the
relative acidity of IL; [I] and [IH+] are the molar concentrations
of, respectively, the unprotonated and protonated forms of the
indicator. Based on the Beer–Lambert law the absorption is
proportional to the concentration of absorbing species in the
material, and on condition of the same light path length, the
ratio of [I]/[IH+] can be calculated by the absorbance difference
of basic indicator measured after addition of lactam-based
Brønsted-acidic ILs.
H0 = pK(I) + log([I]/[IH+])
(1)
662 | Green Chem., 2010, 12, 661–665
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
©