G Model
CCLET 3010 1–3
P.-Z. Zhang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
3
Scheme 2. Synthesis of compounds 9–11. Reagents and conditions: DMF, DIPEA, KI, M.W., 55 8C, 20 min, 30–60%.
Table 1
The cytotoxic activities of compounds 9–11.
Cell lines
Cytotoxicity (IC50
, mmol/L)
9
a
9b
9c
10a
10b
10c
44.1 Æ 0.04
11a
35.43 Æ 0.08
11b
44.2 Æ 0.04
11c
75.7 Æ 0.04
Cisplatin
HeLa
96.0 Æ 0.03
33.3 Æ 0.03
>100
85.1 Æ 0.03
>100
>100 >100
20.4 Æ 0.12
16.9 Æ 1.36
MCF-7
17.3 Æ 0.218
>100 27.3 Æ 0.31
>100
>100
>100
>100
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
and N-ethylamino azasugar 5a was studied to optimize the
reaction conditions with different solvents, temperature, the acid-
binding agent, the amount of additive KI, as well as microwave
irradiation. It was found that although the reaction with normal
heating at 80 8C for 24 h provided compound 6 only in 10% yield,
the microwave irradiation could remarkably improve the reaction
efficiency with a few minutes of irradiation. Thus, the microwave
assisted reaction of compound 6 and N-alkylamino azasugar 5a
(2.0 equiv.) was carried out in DMF, in the presence of DIPEA and
KI, under microwave irradiation at 55 8C for 20 min to afford
compound 9 in a yield of 60%. Similarly, compounds 9b–11c were
obtained in yields of 30–59%.
The cytotoxicity of the novel, azasugar-modified anthraquinone
derivatives 9–11 against HeLa cell lines (human cervical cancer
cells) and MCF-7 (human breast cancer cells) in vitro were
examined with comparison to the control drug (cisplatin). As
shown in Table 1, the compounds showed lower cytotoxic activity
against HeLa and Mcf-7 cells, however, compounds 9a and 10b
exhibit good selective toxicity against MCF-7, and especially
compound 9a with mono-azasugar conjugate at the 2-position
exhibited a similar activity to MCF-7 as the control drug (cisplatin).
For all compounds, the mono- and di-substituted position and the
lengths of the chain between anthraquinone and azasugar all
influenced the cytotoxic activities.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
150
References
153
[1] M.L. Bochman, K. Paeschke, V.A. Zakian, DNA secondary structures: stability and 154
function of G-quadruplex structures, Nat. Rev. Genet. 13 (2012) 770–780.
155
[
2] N.W. Kim, M.A. Piatyszek, K.R. Prowse, et al., Specific association of human 156
telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer, Science 266 (1994) 157
2011–2015.
158
159
160
[3] S. Mu
¨
ller, S. Kumari, R. Rodriguez, S. Blasubramanian, Small-molecule-mediated
G-quadruplex isolation from human cells, Nat. Chem. 2 (2010) 1095–1098.
[
4] D. Koirala, S. Dhakal, B. Ashbridge, et al., A single-molecule platform for investi- 161
gation of interactions between G-quadruplexes and small-molecule ligands, Nat. 162
Chem. 3 (2011) 782–787.
5] S. Lin, M. Xu, G. Yuan, Study of STAT3 G-quadruplex folding patterns by CD 164
spectroscopy and molecular modeling, Chin. Chem. Lett. 23 (2012) 329–331.
6] D. Sun, B. Thompson, B.E. Cathers, et al., Inhibition of human telomerase by a 166
G-quadruplex-interactive compound, J. Med. Chem. 40 (1997) 2113–2116.
7] M.P. Teulade-Fichou, C. Carrasco, L. Guittat, et al., Selective recognition of 168
G-quadruplex telomeric DNA by a bis(quinacridine) macrocycle, J. Am. Chem. 169
Soc. 125 (2003) 4732–4740.
163
165
167
[
[
[
170
[8] T. Lemarteleur, D. Gomez, R. Paterski, et al., Stabilization of the c-myc gene 171
promoter quadruplex by specific ligands’ inhibitors of telomerase, Biochem. 172
Biophys. Res. Commun. 323 (2004) 802–808.
9] J.H. Tan, L.Q. Gu, J.Y. Wu, Design of selective G-quadruplex ligands as potential 174
anticancer agents, Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 8 (2008) 1163–1178.
173
[
175
[
[
[
[
10] S.M. Hampel, A. Sidibe, M. Gunaratnam, J.F. Riou, S. Neidle, Tetrasubstituted 176
naphthalene diimide ligands with selectivity for telomeric G-quadruplexes and 177
1
35
4. Conclusion
cancer cells, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6459–6463.
178
11] M. Micco, G.W. Collie, A.G. Dale, et al., Structure-based design and evaluation of 179
naphthalene diimide G-quadruplex ligands as telomere targeting agents in 180
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
A series of novel, azasugar-modified anthraquinone deriva-
tives at 2-, 2,6- and 2,7- positions have been synthesized. Their
cytotoxic activities against HeLa and MCF-7 cells were prelim-
inarily evaluated. Compound 9a with the mono-azasugar
conjugate at the 2- position showed good activity against
MCF-7. The further synthesis, biological activities and DNA
binding properties of carbohydrate modified anthraquinone
derivatives are underway.
pancreatic cancer cells, J. Med. Chem. 56 (2013) 2959–2974.
181
12] G. Zagotto, C. Sissi, L. Lucatello, et al., Aminoacyl-anthraquinone conjugates as 182
telomerase inhibitors: synthesis, biophysical and biological evaluation, J. Med. 183
Chem. 51 (2008) 5566–5574.
184
13] P. Sears, C.H. Wong, Carbohydrate mimetics: a new strategy for tackling the 185
problem of carbohydrate-mediated biological recognition, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 186
38 (1999) 2300–2324.
187
[14] I. Manet, F. Manoli, B. Zambelli, et al., Affinity of the anthracycline antitumor 188
drugs doxorubicin and sabarubicin for human telomeric G-quadruplex structures, 189
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011) 540–551.
15] N. Ranjan, K.F. Andreasen, S. Kumar, D. Hyde-Volpe, D.P. Arya, Aminoglycoside 191
binding to oxytricha nova telomeric DNA, Biochemistry 49 (2010) 9891–9903.
16] P. Compain, O.R. Martin, Iminosugars: From Synthesis to Therapeutic 193
Applications, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2007, pp. 87–130.
17] K. Tony, M. Shing, A short and practical synthesis of (2S,5S)-bishydroxymethyl- 195
(3R,4R)-bishydroxypyrrolidine, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1987) 262–263.
18] S. Venitt, C. Crofton-Sleigh, M. Agbandje, T.C. Jenkins, S. Neidle, Anthracene-9, 197
0-diones as potential anticancer agents: bacterial mutation studies of amido- 198
substituted derivatives reveal an unexpected lack of mutagenicity, J. Med. Chem. 199
41 (1998) 3748–3752.
190
192
194
196
[
[
[
[
1
44
Acknowledgments
1
1
1
1
1
45 Q2
46
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Nos. 21372059 and 21172051), the Hebei Key
Basic Research (No. 12966417D), the Hebei Natural Science
Foundation (No. B2012201041) and the Foundation of Hebei
Education Department (No. YQ2013006).
47
1
48
49
200