Chemistry Letters 2000
1137
The intercalation capacity of Cl– in NaCl solution with
Mg–Al oxide is investigated.9,10 The degree of Cl– removal
was 50% by adding Mg–Al oxide of 2.5 times the stoichiomet-
ric quantity at 80 °C for 1 h, and it was known that the degree
of Cl– removal was low because OH– was easily intercalated
with increasing pH as expressed by eq (3).9 However, in this
study, it was clear that Cl– was removed above 90% by using
Mg–Al oxide of 1.75 times the stoichiometric quantity in the
strong hydrochloric acid below initial pH 1.
The advantage of this treatment method is that Mg–Al
oxide can be used efficiently as increasing initial HCl concen-
trations. The treatment method for waste water containing
chloride ion (CaCl2) which is discharged from landfill is
thought that HCl and CaSO4·2H2O are produced by adding
H2SO4 to this waste water, and Mg–Al oxide is applied for the
removal of the produced HCl. It is also thought that Mg–Al
oxide is applied for the removal of HCl which is discharged
from garbage incinerator or flon decomposition plants. It is
expected that the produced Cl–HT can be used as ion exchanger
for removing phosphorus to prevent eutrophication of surface
water by algae bloom.11 Kawamoto et al. have reported that
residual concentrations of the phosphate ion from rural sewages
treated with Cl–HT were less than 1 mg/L.12
of dissolved Mg2+ decreased with increasing the Mg0.70Al0.20
O
quantity. It is thought that the once dissolved Mg2+ was repre-
cipitated as hydroxide with increasing pH, since the solubility
product of Mg(OH)2 is small. This was confirmed by XRD
analysis of the precipitates. Dissolved Al3+ was not recognized.
Since Al is amphoteric, it initially dissolves, but it precipitates
as a hydroxide as the reaction progresses.
References and Notes
The following study was carried out in order to know the
degree of Cl– removal for various concentrations of HCl. The
reaction was finished within 1 h in consideration for the indus-
trialization of this waste water treatment.
1
2
3
F. Takano, T. Shoji, and T. Komatsu, Haikibutsugakkaishi, 8, 523
(1997).
Y. Horii, S. Higuchi, T. Shimaoka, and M. Hanashima,
Haikibutsugakkaishi, 8, 529 (1997).
K. Narita, T. Tomita, K. Nakagawa, and H. Shibata, Proceedings of
the 9th Annual Conference of the Japan Society of Waste
Management Experts, Nagoya, October, 815 (1998).
M. T. Olguin, P. Bosch, D. Acosta, and S. Bulbulian, Clays Clay
Miner., 46, 567 (1998).
M. C. Hermosin, I. Pavlovic, M. A. Ulibarri, and J. Cornejo, Water
Res., 30, 171 (1996).
Figure 4 shows the effect of HCl concentration on the
removal of Cl– using Mg0.70Al0.20O of 1.75 times the stoichiomet-
ric quantity at 60 °C for 1 h. The degree of Cl– removal decreased
with decreasing HCl concentration. The degree of Cl– removal
was almost constant at 0.1–0.5 M HCl, but the removal decreased
significantly below 0.1 M HCl. It is suspected that the rate of
intercalation by Cl– was faster than the rate of acid neutralization
with the reconstruction reaction of Mg0.70Al0.20O as increasing
HCl concentration, and Cl– was intercalated into the reconstructed
HT promptly without the competition reactions as expressed by eq
(4). The residual concentrations of Cl– was 0.009 M at 0.5 M
HCl. It has satisfied the desirable concentration range, since the
concentrations of Cl– should be below 0.014M to prevent the agri-
cultural wreck of crops by damage from salt.2
4
5
6
I. Pavlovic, M. A. Ulibarri, M. C. Hermosin, and J. Cornejo,
Fresenius Envir. Bull., 6, 266 (1997).
7
8
9
S. K. Yun and T. J. Pinnavaia, Chem. Mater., 7, 348 (1995).
S. Miyata, Clays Clay Miner., 31, 305 (1983).
T. Sato, T. Wakabayashi, and M. Shimada, Ind. Eng. Chem., Process
Des. Dev., 25, 89 (1986).
10 T. Sato, S. Onai, T. Yoshioka, and A. Okuwaki, J. Chem. Technol.
Biotechnol., 57, 137 (1993).
11 H. Shin, M. Kim, S. Nam, and H. Moon, Water Sci. Technol., 34,
161 (1996).
12 A. Kawamoto, A. Ookubo, T. Sato, and T. Suzuki,
Mizukankyougakkaishi, 22, 875 (1999).