M. Kirihara et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 6377–6380
6379
Table 3 (continued)
cat. TaCl5
I-
"I+"
H2O2
Entry
Starting material
Time
Yield (%)
Quant.
I
S
S
S
S
S
I S
S
S
9
1 h
R
R'
R
R'
R
R'
HO
1k
H2O
-H+
-H+
O
I-
+
OH
R'
I
S
S
R
R'
R
S
S
-
S S
10
1.5 h
95
Scheme 4.
1l
S
Ph
S
H
1m
compound (Scheme 4). Further details of this reaction
are currently under investigation.
11
12
92 h
68 h
82
85
The general experimental procedure for the deprotection
is as follows: A mixture of 1 (0.5 mmol), tantalum chlo-
ride (17.9 mg, 0.05 mmol), sodium iodide (7.5 mg,
0.05 mmol) and 30% hydrogen peroxide (1.15 mL,
10.0 mmol) in ethyl acetate (3 mL) and water (3 mL)
was stirred at room temperature. The reaction was moni-
tored by thin layer chromatography (TLC). After 1 dis-
appeared on TLC, saturated aqueous sodium thiosulfate
(2 mL) and saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate
(2 mL) were added to the reaction mixture. The organic
layer was separated and the aqueous phase was
extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL · 3). The combined
organic phase was washed with brine, dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate, and evaporated. Chromato-
graphy on silica gel gave a pure product.
S
S
H
CH3(CH2)6
1n
S
S
H
13
6 days
81
1o
a Phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2) was used instead of water.
phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) was used as the part of sol-
vent instead of water (entry 8). Interestingly, the dithio-
acetals derived from aldehydes (1m–o) reacted more
slowly than the dithioacetals (1a–l) derived from
ketones. In the case of the equimolar mixture of 1a
and 1m, 1a was chemoselectively deprotected to afford
2a in 91%, and 80% of 1m was recovered (Scheme 3).
These results are in sharp contrast to the results of the
dedithioacetalization with V2O5–BrÀ–H2O2 reported
by Khan et al. They reported that the dithioacetals
derived from aldehydes quickly reacted to afford the
aldehydes.5
References and notes
1. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. In Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New
York, 1999, pp 329–344, and references cited therein.
2. (a) Seebach, D.; Corey, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 231–
237; (b) Page, P. C. B.; van Niel, M. B.; Prodger, J. C.
Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 7643–7677.
3. For recent examples, see: (a) Bandgar, B. P.; Kasture, S. P.
Green Chem. 2000, 2, 154–156; (b) Kamal, A.; Laxman, E.;
Reddy, P. S. M. M. Synlett 2000, 1476–1478; (c) Vakalo-
poulos, A.; Hoffmann, H. M. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2185–
2188; (d) Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Hazarkhani, H.;
Karimi, B. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2572–2576; (e) Liu, J.;
Wong, C.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4037–4039; (f)
Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Raghavendra, S.; Satya-
narayana, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4679–4681;
Barhate, N. B.; Shinde, P. D.; Mahajan, V. A.; Wakharkar,
R. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6031–6033; (g) Wu, Y.;
Shen, X.; Huang, J.-H.; Tang, C.-J.; Liu, H.-H.; Hu, Q.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6443–6445; (h) Khan, A. T.;
Mondal, E.; Sahu, P. R. Synlett 2003, 377–381; (i) Langille,
N. F.; Dakin, L. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 575–
578; (j) Kamal, A.; Reddy, P. S. M. M.; Reddy, D. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2857–2860; (k) Iranpoor, N.;
Firouzabadi, H.; Shaterian, H. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 4769–4773; (l) Krishnaveni, N. S.; Surendra, K.;
Nageswar, Y. V. D.; Rao, K. R. Synthesis 2003, 2295–
2297; (m) Nicolaou, K. C.; Mathison, C. J. N.; Montagnon,
T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4077–4082; (n)
Nicolaou, K. C.; Mathison, C. J. N.; Montagnon, T.
The plausible reaction mechanisms are as follows. TaCl5
catalyzed the hydrogen peroxide oxidation of IÀ to the
I+ equivalent, and the reactive I+ equivalent then reacts
with dithioacetals to form an iodosulfonium complex,
which is finally hydrolyzed by water to the carbonyl
0.1 eq. NaI, 0.1 eq. TaCl5,
20 eq. H2O2
S
S
H
S
S
+
AcOEt, H2O, rt, 2h
1a
1m
O
S
S
H
+
2a (91%)
1m (80%)
Scheme 3.