ꢁ
Oxidative Degradation of Sodiumdodecyl Sulphate by MnO4
1222 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 78, No. 7 (2005)
2
New York (1982).
3 J. H. Fendler and E. J. Fendler, ‘‘Catalysis in Micellar and
Macromolecular System,’’ Academic, New York (1975).
J. H. Fendler, ‘‘Membrane Mimetic Chemistry,’’ Wiley,
-
MnO4
+SDS
+Mn(II)
+Mn(II)
Mn(IV)
Mn(III) / Mn(IV)
+SDS
4
C. A. Bunton, F. Nome, F. H. Quina, and L. S. Romsted,
Acc. Chem. Res., 24, 357 (1991).
‘‘Physics of Amphiphiles: Micelles, Vesicles, and Micro-
+SDS
5
Mn(II)
emulsions,’’ ed by J. Degiorgio and M. Corti, North-Holland,
Amsterdam (1985).
( Product )
6
L. S. Romsted, ‘‘Surfactants in Solution,’’ ed by K. L.
Mittal and B. Lindman, Plenum, New York (1984), Vol. 2.
C. A. Bunton and G. Savelli, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 22,
213 (1986).
Scheme 3.
7
the autocatalytic reaction path. In order to confirm the observa-
tions of previous investigatꢁors,30–32 the kinetics of Mn(II) oxi-
dation to Mn(III) by MnO4 as studied spectrophotometrically
at 525 nm (Table 3). Based on their results, we conclude that in
presence of exꢁternally added Mn(II), the path of oxidation of
SDS by MnO4 may become more complicateꢁd (Scheme 3).
Table 1 clearly demonstrates that the MnO4 oxidizes both
the monomeric molecules of SDS as well as the aggregated
units (micelles). Surfactant monomers rapidly join and leave
micelles, and the aggregation number represents only an aver-
age over time. Micelles are not fixed entities, but have a tran-
sient character.33 Therefore, according to the multiple equilib-
rium models, the distribution of the surfactant (D1) between
various states of aggregation is controlled by a series of dy-
namic association–dissociation equilibria:
8
C. A. Bunton, ‘‘Kinetics and Catalysis in Microheterogene-
ous System,’’ ed by M. Gratzel and K. Kalyanasundaram, Marcel
Dekker, New York (1991).
9 L. Mukherjee, N. Mitra, P. K. Bhattacharya, and S. P.
Moulik, Langmuir, 11, 2866 (1995).
10 J. K. Thomas, Chem. Rev., 80, 285 (1980).
11 E. H. Cordes and R. B. Dunlap, Acc. Chem. Res., 2, 329
(1969).
12 E. H. Cordes, Pure Appl. Chem., 50, 617 (1978).
13 M. N. Khan, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 170, 598 (1995).
14 Kabir-ud-Din, J. K. J. Salem, S. Kumar, M. Z. A. Rafiquee,
and Z. Khan, J. Colloid Interface. Sci., 213, 20 (1999).
15 E. Perez-Benito and E. Rodenas, Langmuir, 7, 232 (1991).
16 K. Sen, P. S. Tribedi, and K. K. Sen Gupta, J. Surf. Sci.
Technol., 16, 220 (2000).
D1 þ D1 ꢀ D2;
D2 þ D1 ꢀ D3;
Dnꢁ1 þ D1 ꢀ Dn:
ð16Þ
ð17Þ
ð18Þ
17 Kabir-ud-Din, J. K. J. Salem, S. Kumar, M. Z. A. Rafiquee,
and Z. Khan, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 215, 9 (1999).
18 Kabir-ud-Din, J. K. J. Salem, S. Kumar, and Z. Khan,
Colloids Surf., 168, 241 (2000).
The small aggregates of the surfactant (dimers, trimers,
tetramers, etc.) exist below the cmc.33 These small submicellar
aggregates are responsible for the oxidation of SDS by
MnO4ꢁ. The equilibrium between the micelles and sub-micel-
lar aggregates is fast. In the presence MnO4ꢁ, the equilibrium
shifts towards the right-hand side because monomeric SDS is
consumed, and is oxidized to the product. On the other hand,
in the micellar pseudo phase, the aggregated SDS molecules
(Dn) are oxidized by the MnO4ꢁ. It has been proved that the
exact reaction site cannot be proposed because the micellar
pseudo phase is regarded as a microenvironment having vary-
ing degrees of water activity.34 The oxidation of SDS was
found to increase with increases in the [Hþ] value (Table 1).
HClO4 is a strong acid, which dissociates completely. There-
fore, due to the electrostatic interactions between the anionic
head group of SDS micelle (–OSO3ꢁ) and Hþ, the local con-
centration of Hþ increases in the Stern layer (water-rich region
as activity of water at the surface of ions micelles is not differ-
ent from water activities in the aqueous pseudo phase). As a
19 Kabir-ud-Din, M. Akram, and Z. Khan, Colloids Surf., A,
178, 167 (2000).
20 Kabir-ud-Din, K. Hartani, S. Kumar, and Z. Khan, Tenside
Surfactants Deterg., 38, 238 (2001).
21 K. B. Wiberg and R. Stewart, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 77, 1786
(1955).
22 J. F. Perez-Benito and C. Arias, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 23,
717 (1991).
23 J. F. Perez-Benito, C. Arias, and E. Amat, J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 177, 288 (1996).
24 V. Pimienta, D. Lavabre, G. Levy, and J. C. Micheau,
J. Phys. Chem., 98, 13294 (1994), and the references cited therein.
25 F. Freeman and J. C. Kappos, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 6628
(1985).
26 D. H. Macartney and N. Sutin, Inorg. Chem., 24, 3403
(1985).
27 Z. Khan, Raju, M. Akram, and Kabir-ud-Din, Int. J. Chem.
Kinet., 36, 359 (2004).
28 J. F. Perez-Benito and C. Arias, J. Colloid Interface Sci.,
149, 92 (1992).
29 F. Mata-Perez and J. F. Perez-Benito, Can. J. Chem., 63,
988 (1985).
30 R. T. Powell, T. Oskin, and N. Ganapathisubramanian,
J. Phys. Chem., 93, 2718 (1989).
31 D. R. Rosseinsky and M. J. Nicol, Trans. Faraday Soc., 61,
2718 (1965).
ꢁ
result,ꢁ–OSO3 converted to –OSO3H. On the other hand,
MnO4 acts as HMnO4 at the interfacial junction at the region
of the Stern and Gouy-Chapman layers; as the reaction pro-
ceeds the –OSO3H form an intermediate with the HMnO4
(Scheme 1). The probable reaction site may be the Stern and
Gouy-Chapman layers’ junctural region.
32 J. I. Morrow and S. Perlman, Inorg. Chem., 12, 2453 (1973).
33 D. O. Shah, ‘‘Micelles, Microemulsions, and Monolayers,’’
ed by D. O. Shah, Marcel Dekker, New York (1998).
34 S. Tascioglu, Tetrahedron, 52, 11113 (1996).
References
1 Z. Khan, Raju, and Kabir-ud-Din, Colloids Surf., A, 225,
75 (2003).