Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
5886 J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5886-5895
Exp er im en ta l a n d Th eor etica l In vestiga tion s of Rin g-Exp a n sion in
1-Meth ylcyclop r op ylca r ben e
Dasan M. Thamattoor,*,†,§ J ohn R. Snoonian,*,‡,| Horst M. Sulzbach,‡ and
Christopher M. Hadad*,‡
Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New J ersey 08544, and Department of
Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Received February 25, 1999
1-Methylcyclopropylcarbene, generated by photolysis of two isomeric hydrocarbon precursors,
undergoes ring-expansion readily to give 1-methylcyclobutene. Experimentally, intramolecular
carbon-hydrogen insertions are not observed. Trapping studies with TME demonstrates the
formation of the expected cyclopropane adduct, and via a double-reciprocal analysis, the lifetime
of 1-methylcyclopropylcarbene was determined to be 12 ns in 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane.
Computational studies show that the barrier to ring-expansion is significantly smaller in
1-methylcyclopropylcarbene than in cyclopropylcarbene. The origin of the increased rate of ring-
expansion is due to stabilization of the positive charge that occurs at the incipient tertiary carbon
that is attached to the migrating carbon center.
In tr od u ction
However, the choice of the appropriate carbene precur-
sor is very important.1,9 There has been substantial
recent interest in the idea that conventional carbene
precursors, such as diazirines and diazo compounds, can
themselves give products identical to those expected from
carbene intermediates.10 For instance, it has been shown
that the ring-expanded product 3-tert-butylcyclobutene
(2) and the fragmentation product tert-butylethylene (3),
which are among the decomposition products of diazirine
1 in CF2ClCFCl2 (Freon-113), are obtained from the
precursor itself rather than the carbene 5 in solution at
0 °C.11 The adduct 4, on the other hand, was formed by
the trapping of 5 by 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene (TME). It is
also known that cyclobutene is the major product in the
gas-phase pyrolysis of the tosylhydrazone salt (7).5
Carbenes can undergo rapid rearrangement processes,
including hydrogen and carbon migrations. There are
multiple means to generate carbenic intermediates in the
gas phase and in solution, but some of these methods may
be problematic due to possible rearrangements in the
excited state of the chosen precursor.1
Substituents can often alter the rearrangement path-
ways available to carbenes. Methyl substitution alters
the lifetime of H-migration in simple alkylchlorocarbenes
as, for example, methylchlorocarbene has a lifetime of
3302-7403 ns, while the lifetime of ethylchlorocarbene
is less than 10 ns.3,4 Cyclopropylcarbenes have been of
interest to us, and they have been reported to undergo
C-migration rearrangements.5 For this system, in par-
ticular, we are interested in the effect of methyl substitu-
tion on the C-migration pathways. Computational studies
on the cyclopropylcarbene system have also revealed that
C-migration is a facile process, and furthermore, the
different conformations of the carbene can lead to dif-
ferent products.6 Bystander substituents have also been
shown to accelerate carbene reactions, both experimen-
tally7 and theoretically.8
† Princeton University.
‡ The Ohio State University.
§ Current address: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 251
Nieuwland Science Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN
46556. Part of this work is taken from the Ph.D. Dissertation of Dasan
M. Thamattoor, Princeton University, 1997.
| Current address: Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 130 Waverly
Street, Cambridge, MA 02139.
(1) (a) Platz, M. S. Adv. Carbene Chem. 1998, 2, 133. (b) See also:
Bonneau, R.; Liu, M. T. H. Adv. Carbene Chem. 1998, 2, 1.
(2) Liu, M. T. H.; Bonneau, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6873.
(3) LaVilla, J . A.; Goodman, J . L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6877.
(4) Bonneau, R.; Liu, M. T. H.; Rayez, M. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 5973.
(5) (a) Friedman, L.; Shechter, H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 1002.
(b) Kirmse, W.; von Bu¨low, B. G.; Schepp, H. J ustus Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1966, 691, 41.
(8) (a) Keating, A. E.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A.; Houk, K. N. J . Phys.
Chem. A 1998, 102, 8467. (b) Evanseck, J . D.; Houk, K. N. J . Phys.
Chem. 1990, 94, 5518.
(9) Thamattoor, D. M.; J ones, M., J r.; Pan, W.; Shevlin, P. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8333.
(10) Ruck, R. T.; J ones, M., J r. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4433
and references therein.
(6) (a) Shevlin, P. B.; McKee, M. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
519. (b) Chou, J .-H.; McKee, M. L.; De Felippis, J .; Squillacote, M.;
Shevlin, P. B. J . Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3291.
(7) (a) Modarelli, D. A.; Morgan, S.; Platz, M. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 7034. (b) Nickon, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 84.
(11) (a) Huang, H.; Platz, M. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8337.
(b) Huang, H.; Platz, M. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5990.
10.1021/jo9903454 CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/23/1999