G Model
CCLET 3730 1–5
2
Z.-B. Wu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
Fig. 1. Structure of modified and optimised chlorantraniliprole.
50
51
compounds exerted good activities against P. xylostella, C. pipiens
pallens, and M. separate.
N-(4-chloro-2-(isopropylcarbamoyl)-6-methylphenyl)-1-(3-c-
hloropyridin-2-yl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxam-
ide (6e):
94
95
96
97
White solid, yield 47%, m.p. 234ꢀ235 8C; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
52
2. Experimental
DMSO-d6):
d
10.17 (s, 1H, NH), 8.66 (d, 1H, J = 4.6 Hz, pyridine H),
98
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Melting points of the compounds were determined on a XT-4
binocular microscope (Beijing Tech Instrument Co., China) and
were not corrected. 1 H NMR and 13 C NMR spectra were recorded
on JEOL-ECX-500 spectrometer. Chemical shifts were reported in
parts per million (ppm) down field from TMS with the solvent
resonance as internal standard. Coupling constants (J) were
reported in Hz and referred to apparent peak multiplications.
Mass spectral studies were conducted on an Agilent 5973 organic
mass spectrometer. Elemental analysis was performed using
Vario-III CHN analyser. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
VECTOR 22 spectrometer.
The synthesis route for title compounds 6a–6n, 7a, 7b and 8a–8f
is shown in Scheme 1. Intermediates 1 to 3 were prepared through
previously reported procedure using ethyl 4,4,4-trifluoro-3-oxobu-
tanoate [13–15]. Key intermediates 4 were prepared by cyclisation
reaction from 3 and 2-amino-5-chloro-3-methylbenzoic acid in the
presence of pyridine and methylsufonyl chloride [3]. Intermediates
5 were prepared by treating intermediates 4 with 80% hydrazine
hydrate according to the reported method [16].
8.46 (s, 1H, pyrazole H), 8.39 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, benzene H), 8.23 (d,
1H, J = 7.5 Hz, pyridine H), 7.82-7.79 (m, 1H, pyridine H), 7.53 (s,
1H, benzene H), 7.35 (s, 1H, NH), 3.99-3.93 (m, 1H, CH), 2.27 (s, 3H,
PhCH3), 1.08 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.07 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
DMSO-d6):
132.6, 132.0, 131.7, 131.3, 128.6, 128.4, 126.0, 122.8, 120.8,
120.6,118.5, 41.4, 22.6, 18.2; IR (KBr, cm-1):
3244.2, 3066.8,
d 165.5, 158.8, 148.3, 147.9, 141.4, 140.9, 139.3, 137.4,
n
2974.2, 2931.8, 1662.6, 1635.6, 1558.4, 1506.4, 1436.9, 1157.2,
867.9; MS (ESI): m/z 500 [M+H]+, 522 [M+Na]+; Anal. Calcd
(C21H18Cl2F3N5O2): C, 50.41; H, 3.63; N, 14.00. Found: C, 50.25; H,
3.52; N, 13.87.
2.4. Insecticidal test
110
All bioassays were performed on test organisms reared in the
laboratory and repeated at 25W1 8C according to statistical
requirements. Mortalities were corrected using Abbott’s formula.
Evaluations were based on a percentage scale (0 = no activity and
100 = complete eradication) at intervals of 5% [17–22].
111
112
113
114
115
72
2.1. General procedure for preparation of 6a–6n
3. Results and discussion
116
117
73
74
75
76
77
Substituted amine was added into a solution of intermediate 4
(0.68 mmol) in 5 mL of acetonitrile. The mixture was stirred at
room temperature, and TLC was used to monitor the reaction.
Finally, pure compounds (6a–6n) were obtained by recrystallising
the crude products in ethanol.
3.1. Synthesis
As shown in Scheme 1, compound 4 is the key intermediate for
the synthesis of title compounds and was prepared by 3 and
2-amino-5-chloro-3-methylbenzoic acid in the presence of pyri-
dine and methylsufonyl chloride. An 89% yield could be obtained
with the temperature at -5 8C. Then the reaction of 4 with
substituted amines gave target compounds 6a–6n with yields of
47% to 93%. Compounds 7a and 7b were synthesised by refluxing 4
and 40% methyl hydrazine. Compounds 8a–8f containing the
acylhydrazone sub-structure were prepared via the reaction of
intermediate 5 and ketones, aldehydes or hemiacetal in ethanol,
with the yield ranging from 70% to 90%.
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
78
2.2. General procedure for preparation of 7a and 7b
79
80
81
82
83
84
A mixture of 40% methyl hydrazine (9.9 mmol) in THF (10 mL)
was added gradually into the solution of intermediate
(4.9 mmol), dissolved in THF (10 mL) and then stirred at room
temperature for 2 h. TLC was used to monitor the reaction. The
mixture was filtered and recrystallised in ethanol to obtain title
compounds 7a and 7b.
4
3.2. Insecticidal activity
129
85
2.3. General procedure for preparation of title compounds 8a–8f
Preliminary insecticidal activity of the title compounds against
five kinds of pests is shown in Table 1. Commercial insecticides
such as chlorantraniliprole, avermectin or hexaflumuron were
selected as positive controls. As indicated in Table 1, most of the
target compounds exhibited good insecticidal activities against
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Different ketone and aldehyde (or hemiacetal) (1.5 mmol) was
added to a stirred solution of intermediate 5 (1.0 mmol) in 5 mL of
ethanol. The mixture was refluxed for 30 min, filtered and
recrystallised in a mixture of ethanol and DMF (1:1 in volume)
to obtain pure compounds 8a–8f.
Physical and spectroscopic characterisation data for title
compounds 6a–6n, 7a, 7b and 8a–8f can be found in Supporting
information, and the representative data for 6e are shown below.
P. xylostella at 500
avermectin under the same conditions, compounds 6a, 6b and 8a
showed 100% activity against P. xylostella at 200 g/mL. Similar to
hexaflumuron, all the tested compounds exhibited 100% activity at
mg/mL. Similar to chlorantraniliprole and
m
Please cite this article in press as: Z.-B. Wu, et al., Design, synthesis and insecticidal activities of novel 1-substituted-5-