Organic Letters
Letter
a
They are usually limited in substrate scope and require the use of
stoichiometric organometallic reagents.
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
In recent years, the Ni-catalyzed cross-couplings of two
carbon electrophiles under reducing conditions have attracted
considerable attention from synthetic chemists.7 Compared
with the classic redox-neutral cross-couplings, the main
advantage of this strategy is that it does not require the use of
organometallic reagents and exhibits excellent functional group
compatibility. Despite the tremendous progress made, difunc-
tionalization of alkynes by trans-addition of two carbon
electrophiles across the triple bond remains unexploited.8
Martin’s group described reductive anti-dicarbofunctionaliza-
tion of alkynes via Ni-catalyzed cyclization/carboxylation of
alkyne-tethered alkyl halides with CO2.8a Montgomery et al.
reported reductive syn-dicarbofunctionalization of alkynes
through Ni-catalyzed oxidative cyclization of alkynals and
coupling with alkyl halides.8b In continuation of our studies
on Ni-catalyzed reductive arylfunctionalization of unsaturated
carbon−carbon bonds,9 we envisioned that with the proper
combination of nickel catalyst, ligand, and reducing agent, the
reductive arylative cyclization of alkynone and aryl halide may
produce a more nucleophilic alkenyl−nickel(I) intermediate,
which would provide a new and effective platform for the
synthesis of endocyclic tetrasubstituted allylic alcohols (Scheme
1c).
b
entry
ligand
reducing agent
yield of 3aa (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
L1
L1
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
Zn
28
43
trace
17
trace
32
Mn
B2Pin2
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
Mn
56
trace
trace
trace
trace
79 (69)
0
9
L7
10
11
dppe
PPh3
L5
L5
L5
c
12
d
13
e
14
0
a
Unless noted otherwise, reactions were carried out in 2 mL of DMF
Based on our previous studies on the Ni-catalyzed reductive
difunctionalization of alkenes,10 we chose alkynone 1a and
phenyl bromide 2a as model substrates to test our reaction
design. We were very delighted to find that, by employing a
combination of NiBr2·dme (10 mol %) as catalyst, bpy (L1, 20
mol %) as ligand, Zn0 (3 equiv) as reducing agent, and NaI (50
mol %) as additive in DMF, the reaction did indeed take place,
leading to the desired 5,5-bicyclic 3aa in 28% yield (Table 1,
entry 1). Among the different reducing agents investigated, Mn0
powder gave the highest yield, whereas B2Pin2 gave only a trace
amount of 3aa (entries 2 and 3). Subsequently, a survey of
bidentate nitrogen ligands was performed (entries 4−9), and
1,10-phenanthroline L5 proved to be the most effective (56%,
entry 7). The formation of target product 3aa was not detected
when the nitrogen ligands were replaced with phosphine ligands
such as PPh3 or dppe (entries 10 and 11). Finally, we found that
an excess of PhBr was needed to isolate the desired 3aa in 69%
yield (entry 12). Nevertheless, most of the PhBr can be
recovered after the reaction, and only a trace of homocoupling
byproduct biphenyl was observed. Unsurprisingly, the reaction
did not proceed in the absence of NiBr2·dme or Mn0 (entries 13
and 14).
at 80 °C for 24 h on a 0.1 mmol scale using 1 equiv of 1a, 2 equiv of
2a, 10 mol % of NiBr2·dme, 20 mol % of ligand, and 3 equiv of
b
reductant. GC yield using adamantane as the internal standard. The
value in brackets is the yield of isolated 3aa after column
c
chromatography purification on silica gel. 4 equiv of 2a was used.
d
e
No NiBr2·dme. No Mn0.
a
Scheme 2. Substrate Scope of Organic Halides
Using the optimal reaction conditions described in Table 1,
entry 12, we first evaluated the effects of various aryl halides 2
(Scheme 2). Bicyclic product 3aa was obtained in 83% yield
from phenyl iodide, whereas phenyl chloride was not reactive at
all. Although a higher yield can be obtained using phenyl iodide,
considering that aryl bromides are typically cheaper and more
widely available, we decided to explore the substrate scope using
aryl bromides. Aryl bromides adorned with electron-donating
groups such as methoxy and amino group at the para-position
proceeded smoothly to produce the corresponding products
3ab and 3ac in 84 and 73% yield, respectively. Whereas an
electron-withdrawing group on the aromatic ring, such as a
fluorine group, reduced the reaction efficiency, product 3ad was
obtained in 33% yield. It is worth noting that the reductive
cyclization reaction could be carried out without affecting the
aryl borate entity, thereby providing opportunities for further
a
Reactions were conducted using 0.2 mmol of 1a; 4 equiv of 2 was
b
used. Yields are of isolated products. The reaction was conducted on
a 1 mmol scale using 5 mol % of NiBr2·dme and 10 mol % of L5.
derivatization through the Suzuki coupling technique (3ae). 2-
Naphthyl bromide was also tolerated to deliver 3ag in 87% yield.
In addition, various (hetero)aryl bromides were also tested.
Dibenzofuran, dibenzothiophene, benzothiophene, pyridine,
and indole were all successfully incorporated into the
corresponding products 3ah−3al in 23−94% yields. Excitingly,
vinyl bromide 2m was also a viable substrate to afford the
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX