REACTION OF O-BENZOYLAMIDOXIMES WITH SODIUM METHOXIDE IN METHANOL
633
several vibrations, and the mechanism changed from
addition–elimination to concerted. The splitting off of the
benzamidoxime anion from the tetrahedral intermediate
in the rate-limiting step is surprising as both the
nucleophile (MeO ) and the leaving group are oxygen
anions, and the pKa of methanol (18.31) is about 1.5–2
times higher than those of substituted benzamidoximes
(Table 1). On the other hand, the nucleophilicity of
benzamidoxime anions as nucleophiles with an a effect is
substantially higher than that of normal oxygen nucleo-
philes with similar pKa values.39 Also, the delocalization
of the electron pair on oxygen to the carbonyl group,
which would favour the reversible splitting off of the
methoxy group in the intermediate, is supported by
repulsion from the electron pair of the adjacent nitrogen
atom,3,40 which is further strengthened by the partial
charge at the nitrogen atom due to delocalization of
electrons from the NH2 group.
structure is close to that of the intermediate, and that the
bond splitting between the carbonyl carbon atom and the
benzamidoxime oxygen has hardly advanced. This is
apparently in contradiction with the high value of
blg = 1.05 found. In substituted phenyl acetates,43,44 the
oxygen atom of the phenoxy group bears an ‘effective
charge’ of 0.7. In substituted O-benzoylamidoximes, the
effective charge at the oxygen atom of substituted
benzamidoximes is probably still higher because the
negative charge transfer to the carbonyl oxygen atom is
supported by repulsion from the electron pair of the
adjacent nitrogen atom bearing a partial negative charge.
By forming the tetrahedral intermediate, this effective
charge at oxygen is cancelled, and blg has a large negative
value even if the CO bond splitting has hardly advanced.
Acknowledgements
The evaluation of substituent effects in O-benzoyl-
bezamidoximes 1a–g is more complex. The reaction
involves both bond formation and bond splitting at
carbonyl carbon atoms, and the reaction product,
substituted methylbenzoate, has a zero charge like the
starting substrate, hence the change of charge at the
carbonyl carbon is greater in the activated complex than
in the product. The structure of the activated complex
approaches that of a tetrahedral intermediate, the
hybridization at the carbonyl carbon atom with the
This work was supported by research grant No. 203/97/
0545 from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic.
REFERENCES
1. F. Eloy and R. Lenaers, Chem. Rev. 62, 155 (1962).
2. H. Berger and A. E. Siegrist, Helv. Chim. Acta 62, 1411 (1979).
ˇ
3. L. Dusˇek, J. Kava´lek and V. Steˇrba, Collect. Czech. Chem.
Commun. 64, 265 (1999).
strongly polar C
=O bond being partially changed (from
4. H. Mu¨ller, Chem. Ber. 22, 2401 (1889).
5. F. Tiemann and P. Kru¨ger, Chem. Ber. 18, 727 (1885).
6. F. Tiemann, Chem. Ber. 18, 2456 (1885).
7. R. Buyle, R. Lenaers and F. Eloy, Helv. Chim. Acta 46, 1073
(1963).
sp2 to sp3). This change is considerably affected by
substituents in the benzene ring. The addition of water to
substituted benzaldehydes, which produces the corre-
sponding neutral diol, exhibits41 a constant of the
equilibrium reaction req equal to 1.71, although two
neutral molecules form a neutral product! The addition of
OH to substituted benzaldehydes giving the anion of the
corresponding diol exhibits42 ꢃeq = 2.76, which means
that the r value of dissociation of the diol (1.05) is similar
to that of substituted benzoic acids. The r value found for
the reaction with methoxide ion is 2.17 and that for the
reaction with the ion pair is 1.98, i.e. again lower by about
10%. This lowering is, as in the previous examples,
obviously predominantly due to the presence of metal
cation in the activated compex.
8. F. Grambal, J. Lasovsky and V. Beka´rek, Collect. Czech. Chem.
´
Commun. 43, 2008 (1978).
9. J. A. Duren and D. L. Heywood, J. Org. Chem. 30, 4359 (1965).
10. A. V. Evangelia and E. D. Micromastoras, Collect. Czech. Chem.
Commun. 48, 596 (1983).
11. C. R. Hauser and G. Vermilion, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 63, 1224 (1964).
12. K. Kahr and C. Berther, Chem. Ber. 93, 132 (1960).
13. L. I. Belenkii, D. B. Brokhovetskii and M. M. Kraynshkin,
Tetrahedron 46, 1659 (1990).
14. O. Exner and N. Motekov, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 43,
2746 (1978).
15. F. Grambal, Chem. Zvesti 33, 371 (1979).
16. K. J. Dignam, A. F. Hegarty and P. L. Quain, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1457 (1991).
17. H. Gozlan, R. Michelot, C. Riche and R. Rips, Tetrahedron 33,
2535 (1977).
An assessment of the extent to which the activated
complex of a particular reaction approaches the tetra-
hedral intermediate was made by comparing the r
constant of the reaction of 4-nitrophenyl esters of
substituted benzoic acids with OH ions going by
concerted mechanism (the most recent value found45 in
10% aqueous acetonitrile is ꢃ = 2.14) with the r constant
of addition of OH ion to substituted benzaldehydes
(ꢃeq = 2.76). From these values, it was concluded43 that
the activated complex structure is close to the inter-
mediate structure.
18. O. Exner and N. Motekov, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 47,
814 (1982).
19. K. J. Dignam and A. F. Hegarty, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 704
(1980).
20. J. Barthel, J. C. Justice and R. Wacker, Z. Phys. Chem. 84, 100
(1973).
21. J. E. Gordon, The Stereochemistry of Electrolyte Solutions, pp. 40
and 389. Wiley, New York 1975.
22. M. J. Pregel, E. J. Dunn and E. Buncel, Can. J. Chem. 68, 1846
(1990).
23. J. L. Kurz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 987 (1963).
24. E. J. Dunn and E. Buncel, Can. J. Chem. 67, 1440 (1989).
25. A. Williams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 23, 93 (1994).
26. D. Stefanidis, S. Cho, S. D. Pafanon and W. P. Jencks, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 115, 1650 (1993).
Comparison of this value with our ꢃ = 2.17 allows the
conclusion that in our case also the activated complex
27. B. S. Saif, A. K. Luthra and A. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111,
2647 (1989).
Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 12, 626–634 (1999)